Closed Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 26
-
26th October 2007, 01:35 AM #1
WMA vs. MP3 Which one has better SOUND QUALITY?
I've always been ripping music using 192kbps WMA, but it is as good as the 320kbps MP3? I'm just curious as to which format has better sound quality, since I'm getting a new mp3 player soon. (it's 4GB and supports both)
<a href="http://im.live.com/?source=WLM468x60"><img src="http://global.msads.net/ads/pronws/WLM2.468x60.gif"><img src="http://microsoftwlmessengermkt.112.2o7.net/b/ss/mswlmmktdreamcom/1/H.9--NS/1?ns=microsoftwlmessengermkt&pageName=Module&c3=Module%20WLM468x60" width="0" height="0" border="0"/></a>
-
26th October 2007, 01:45 AM #2
Re: WMA vs. MP3 Which one has better SOUND QUALITY?
i think wma sounds better than mp3 at the same kbps. aac sounds the best though

Dell Inspiron 1520 - Jet Black
Centrino Duo T7300 | 4GB RAM | NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT | Bluetooth EDR 2.0 | Intel 3945G | Windows Vista Ultimate x64
-
26th October 2007, 01:47 AM #3Notebook Prophet
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Posts
- 6,566
- Rep Power
- 43
Re: WMA vs. MP3 Which one has better SOUND QUALITY?
Yes, it makes a huge difference. You can hear things you couldn't before and most of that background noise is out of it. Now what's better is Lossless and since you have a 4gb it's perfect for you. Also remember no talk of piracy here.
-
26th October 2007, 01:51 AM #4
Re: WMA vs. MP3 Which one has better SOUND QUALITY?
-
26th October 2007, 01:52 AM #5Notebook Prophet
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Posts
- 6,566
- Rep Power
- 43
Re: WMA vs. MP3 Which one has better SOUND QUALITY?
Well maybe he...or...hrm. =\ I guess it is to late.
-
26th October 2007, 02:54 AM #6
Re: WMA vs. MP3 Which one has better SOUND QUALITY?
Piracy huh?
I though mp3 players doesn't support WMA Lossless...<a href="http://im.live.com/?source=WLM468x60"><img src="http://global.msads.net/ads/pronws/WLM2.468x60.gif"><img src="http://microsoftwlmessengermkt.112.2o7.net/b/ss/mswlmmktdreamcom/1/H.9--NS/1?ns=microsoftwlmessengermkt&pageName=Module&c3=Module%20WLM468x60" width="0" height="0" border="0"/></a>
-
26th October 2007, 03:20 AM #7
Re: WMA vs. MP3 Which one has better SOUND QUALITY?
Here's cut and paste from wikipedia (note that WMA is made by microsoft):
"Microsoft claims that audio encoded with WMA sounds better than MP3 at the same bit rate; Microsoft also claims that audio encoded with WMA at lower bit rates sound better than MP3 at higher bit rates. Double blind listening tests with other lossy audio codecs have shown varying results, from failure to support Microsoft's claims about its superior quality to supremacy over other codecs. One independent test conducted in May 2004 at 128 kbit/s showed that WMA was roughly equivalent to LAME MP3; inferior to AAC and Vorbis; and superior to ATRAC3 (software version). Another test performed by ExtremeTech showed different results, however, placing WMA at the top of the list in terms of quality."ASUS U36JC-A1 w/ Intel 6300 wifi || G.Skill 256GB SSD
Dell Latitude E6400 (company laptop) w/ Intel P8600 || 160GB HDD || 4GB Ram || Nvidia Quadro 160M
Canon 5DMKII || 24-70mm f/2.8L || 70-200mm f/2.8L IS VII|| 100mm 2.8L Macro || 430EX II
flickr
-
26th October 2007, 03:54 AM #8
Re: WMA vs. MP3 Which one has better SOUND QUALITY?
Wait, I just realized that I can use AAC as well. So does AAC beat both mp3 and WMA?
<a href="http://im.live.com/?source=WLM468x60"><img src="http://global.msads.net/ads/pronws/WLM2.468x60.gif"><img src="http://microsoftwlmessengermkt.112.2o7.net/b/ss/mswlmmktdreamcom/1/H.9--NS/1?ns=microsoftwlmessengermkt&pageName=Module&c3=Module%20WLM468x60" width="0" height="0" border="0"/></a>
-
26th October 2007, 04:35 AM #9Notebook Evangelist
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- West Yorkshire, UK
- Posts
- 456
- Rep Power
- 16
Re: WMA vs. MP3 Which one has better SOUND QUALITY?
I would go with AAC out of those options IMO. Whether or not it beats WMA or mp3 I've no idea lol, but, I think it sounds better!
But out of any music format I would use FLAC if it were an option or Ogg tho very few music players will play those two formats.Last edited by sasanac; 26th October 2007 at 04:37 AM.
<BR>macbook 2ghz core2duo - 64bit vista home premium amd x2 athlon 64 4200+ work/gaming rig
"You shouldn't drink coffee at work. It keeps you awake in the afternoons." Ronald Regan
-
26th October 2007, 06:48 AM #10
Re: WMA vs. MP3 Which one has better SOUND QUALITY?
AAC beats MP3 and WMA. There is also OGG, but people ignore that as it is not supported by hardware players.
Similar Threads
-
How to convert mp3 to wma?
By prol91 in forum Windows OS and SoftwareReplies: 13Last Post: 25th November 2007, 04:16 PM -
How is the Asus G2S-A1's Sound Quality and Speaker Quality?
By hofo_mofo in forum AsusReplies: 13Last Post: 5th September 2007, 04:25 AM -
Good mp3 / wma editor, track splitter?
By Bostonguy in forum Windows OS and SoftwareReplies: 3Last Post: 23rd June 2006, 08:11 PM -
wma to mp3?and folder cust. problem
By jimbomatic in forum Windows OS and SoftwareReplies: 7Last Post: 5th December 2004, 12:53 AM -
MP3 quality
By quesoyyo in forum Off TopicReplies: 4Last Post: 12th May 2004, 09:02 AM



LinkBack URL










I`m upgrading, are you? (GTX 780M...
Today, 09:35 AM in Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)