Quantcast 32 vs 64 bit Vista

Closed Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Notebook Geek
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Seattle,WA/Bozeman,MT
    Posts
    96
    Rep Power
    15

    Default 32 vs 64 bit Vista

    Apart from the already obvious compatibility issues and the benefit of the 3.2 gb+ advantage of the 64 bit, etc, is there any other draw back of using the 64 bit OS compared to the 32? Like does it draw more system power to run the 64 instead? Or what are the other +'s and -'s? Just a bit fuzzy on the issue - thanks

  2. #2
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Plymouth, UK
    Posts
    285
    Rep Power
    16

    Default Re: 32 vs 64 bit Vista

    i'm running it on my desktop at the moment and have no problems with it at all; the only issue i have had with it is when trying to install need for speed most wanted where it wouldn't detect the version of direct x correctly.

    also firewall software can be a problem as i couldn't find any for ages.
    Aspire 9300 Series
    Turion X2 TL-60 @ 2.0 GHz "Tyler" core
    250 Gb Hdd
    4 Gb Hynix DDR2
    Nvidia Gefore Go 7600 128MB dedicated @ 430/430 MHz
    Bluetooth 2.0 +EDR
    Atheros AR5005G

  3. #3
    Notebook Deity
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,684
    Rep Power
    23

    Default Re: 32 vs 64 bit Vista

    There are some security benefits but I don't remember them off the top of my head. 64 bit should be technically more stable since it requires signed drivers.

  4. #4
    Notebook Geek
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Seattle,WA/Bozeman,MT
    Posts
    96
    Rep Power
    15

    Default Re: 32 vs 64 bit Vista

    then again more restrictive in terms of using older hardware/apps...

    but how does it preform in terms of system resources compared to the 32 bit?

  5. #5
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Plymouth, UK
    Posts
    285
    Rep Power
    16

    Default Re: 32 vs 64 bit Vista

    i've not noticed any difference to be honest, although i do prefer it over 32-bit, i'm considering it for my notebook but i dont know whether i can be bothered to find all of the drivers for it.

    i would say it should be more stable as it is based on server 2003
    Aspire 9300 Series
    Turion X2 TL-60 @ 2.0 GHz "Tyler" core
    250 Gb Hdd
    4 Gb Hynix DDR2
    Nvidia Gefore Go 7600 128MB dedicated @ 430/430 MHz
    Bluetooth 2.0 +EDR
    Atheros AR5005G

  6. #6
    Windows 7 x64
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    1,318
    Rep Power
    21

    Default Re: 32 vs 64 bit Vista

    It is faster, more secure and more stable. And no, it does not consume more power then a regular 32bit Vista.

    Oh and by the way, some applications might end up being slower when running in the 64bit OS.
    Asus A8JP - C2D T7200, 2GB Ram, 120GB HDD, 14.1" screen, Vista Business x64
    Gadgets: Nokia N73, IPod Nano 2GB, Creative Zen Microphoto 8GB.

    Mini guide - Squeeze XP

  7. #7
    Blah Blah Blah!!!
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,363
    Rep Power
    29

    Default Re: 32 vs 64 bit Vista

    64bit Vista is (like System64 said) faster & more stable. Not sure why it would be more secure though.

    Most apps work under 64 bit, Damn near ALL the Major apps work. Some apps might have a minor flaw, most with right click menus. EX: Tugzip.

    Vista updates has also detected all the right 64bit drivers for my hardware.

  8. #8
    Windows 7 x64
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    1,318
    Rep Power
    21

    Default Re: 32 vs 64 bit Vista

    Quote Originally Posted by LIVEFRMNYC View Post
    64bit Vista is (like System64 said) faster & more stable. Not sure why it would be more secure though.
    It has a slew of security end features not found in 32bit Vista, such as PatchGuard, Address Space Layout Radomnizer and so on.http://www.winsupersite.com/showcase...sta_ff_x64.asp
    Asus A8JP - C2D T7200, 2GB Ram, 120GB HDD, 14.1" screen, Vista Business x64
    Gadgets: Nokia N73, IPod Nano 2GB, Creative Zen Microphoto 8GB.

    Mini guide - Squeeze XP

  9. #9
    Master Viking
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Huge Tracts of Land
    Posts
    16,681
    Rep Power
    91

    Default Re: 32 vs 64 bit Vista

    64bit has kernal mode protection. Any program that trys to acces the kernal must be digitally signed.

    You can overide it via command prompt if you need to for 3rd party software/drivers that you know are safe.

  10. #10
    Notebook Geek
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Seattle,WA/Bozeman,MT
    Posts
    96
    Rep Power
    15

    Default Re: 32 vs 64 bit Vista

    Quote Originally Posted by System64 View Post
    It is faster, more secure and more stable. And no, it does not consume more power then a regular 32bit Vista.

    Oh and by the way, some applications might end up being slower when running in the 64bit OS.
    lol, thats a bit contradicting... its faster but programs run slower?

    i get what you mean though

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Install 32-Bit Vista upgrade over 64-Bit XP?
    By Sponsi in forum Windows OS and Software
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 17th July 2007, 11:28 AM
  2. Dual Boot between Vista Ultimate 32 bit and 64 bit
    By w_tanoto in forum Windows OS and Software
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 5th July 2007, 01:34 AM
  3. Vista Home Premium (32-bit) on a 64-bit CPU?
    By mssx in forum Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 1st May 2007, 12:31 AM
  4. Dual boot Vista 64 bit and XP Professional 32 bit
    By patel7 in forum Windows OS and Software
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 24th February 2007, 09:44 AM
  5. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 21st December 2006, 04:34 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:50 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0