Quantcast Intel 4500MHD vs NVIDIA 8600M GT - which is better for video via HDMI?

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    4
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Intel 4500MHD vs NVIDIA 8600M GT - which is better for video via HDMI?

    I'm not worried about games, only about connecting a laptop to an HDTV to play movies and HiDef content. Will either or both of these processors do the job? Which will do it better?

    Also, there were stories a few months ago about the 8600M being defective and overheating. Were those issues ever resolved? Should I avoid an 8600M based laptop?

    Are there any Dell laptops that use the 4500MHD?

    Thanks for your help.

  2. #2
    Notebook Guru
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    69
    Rep Power
    15

    Default Re: Intel 4500MHD vs NVIDIA 8600M GT - which is better for video via HDMI?

    The E series Latitudes use the 4500.

    I'd recommend the 4500, less heat, more power efficient, built-in HD/BR decoding. The performance of the 4500 is much better than previous Intel chipsets.

    Save the money and energy and go with the 4500MHD.

  3. #3
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    333
    Rep Power
    18

    Us Re: Intel 4500MHD vs NVIDIA 8600M GT - which is better for video via HDMI?

    There is a huge difference between the two. The 8600M GT is a dedicated GPU, and thus geometrically more powerful then the Intel 4500MHD, which is a dedicated GPU (built into the chipset). The 8600M will perform much better than the 4500M in games, and application, but will use more power. If battery life and price are VERY important to you, than go for the 4500M. But if you plan on doing anything graphic intensive (games, videos, photos, CAD, etc), go for the 8600M.

  4. #4
    How's It Made Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    4,161
    Rep Power
    34

    Default Re: Intel 4500MHD vs NVIDIA 8600M GT - which is better for video via HDMI?

    The 8600M GT is much more powerful than the HD4500.
    Something like
    8600M GT>>>>>>>>>>>HD4500 in terms of power

    Intel's integrated graphics have never been super, even ATI's integrated solution(the ATI HD3200) is more than twice as powerful.

    Since you didn't mention anything very graphic intensive though except HD, the HD4500 should do the job fine. The "HD" in the name isn't just for show lol It is capable of processing HD content.

    The 8600 is mostly if you plan on gaming or doing any type of graphic heavy stuff.

    Also, I'm not 100% sure, but I believe there are accounts that the G86 series of GPUs are ok to use now.

    "When I am sad I cut myself...another piece of cake."

  5. #5
    Notebook Guru
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    69
    Rep Power
    15

    Default Re: Intel 4500MHD vs NVIDIA 8600M GT - which is better for video via HDMI?

    Define graphic heavy stuff. Unless your using some 3d rendering program like a CAD program or playing games, the discrete video won't help at all.

    I don't want people to get confused that viewing photos or watching video will make any difference in this comparison because it won't.

    Graphic heavy = 3d rendering, gaming, cad, etc,

    Resizing/compressing video or photos will not be affected by the video card. I just didn't want that to get interpreted incorrectly.

  6. #6
    How's It Made Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    4,161
    Rep Power
    34

    Default Re: Intel 4500MHD vs NVIDIA 8600M GT - which is better for video via HDMI?

    Well the biggest advantage the 8600M GT has over the HD4500 is for games. If the OP wanted to render with CAD or something, a FireGL or Quadro card would be better.

    But yes, for videos, photos and all the jazz, the HD4500 will not yield any inferior quality to the 8600M GT. In fact, if you don't plan on gaming(or you game something 3-4+ years old), then I'd recommend integrated because of less heat and less power usage(and more battery life).

    So I'd recommend sticking with the HD4500.

    "When I am sad I cut myself...another piece of cake."

  7. #7
    Derp
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    2,183
    Rep Power
    23

    Default Re: Intel 4500MHD vs NVIDIA 8600M GT - which is better for video via HDMI?

    Just stick with the Intel 4500MHD for movies.

    Malibal Lotus P150HM
    15.6" 1920x1080 LED AUO 95% Glossy | i7-2670QM | 8GB DDR3 1333MHz | AMD 6990M 2GB GDDR5 | 128 GB m4 Crucial SSD | 500GB 7200RPM HDD | Intel 6230 | AS5

  8. #8
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    683
    Rep Power
    17

    Default Re: Intel 4500MHD vs NVIDIA 8600M GT - which is better for video via HDMI?

    If your just worried about HDMI output and movies/non gaming or rendering needs, the 4500 is perfect. It is very good at decoding hi def movies and good power consumption as well.
    Current Laptop: Thinkpad T400 C2D T9600 2.8Ghz Ghz ATI 3470 Hybrid Graphics 14.1 WXGA+ LG LED 8GB Ram 320GB 7200RPM 9-Cell

    Previous Laptop: Thinkpad T42 Pentium M 1.8Ghz Radeon 9600 14.1 SXGA+ 2GB Ram 60GB 7200RPM 9-Cell

  9. #9
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    106
    Rep Power
    15

    Default Re: Intel 4500MHD vs NVIDIA 8600M GT - which is better for video via HDMI?

    however these are all good point but you have to think about future proof also... are you going to want to play any type of game? Is it wortht the extra 100 bucks? I would just get the 8600GT laptop and not be disapointed.

  10. #10
    How's It Made Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    4,161
    Rep Power
    34

    Default Re: Intel 4500MHD vs NVIDIA 8600M GT - which is better for video via HDMI?

    The fact is that he specifically mentioned not being interested in games and that is the major power the 8600M GT has over the HD4500. If he does want to add gaming into his future uses of the laptop, then yes, he should get the 8600M GT, but if he isn't interested for x reason, then no use spending money you won't be fully utilizing either. I know people who don't play games, have an GMA950 in their laptops and are perfectly happy after 2 years.

    "When I am sad I cut myself...another piece of cake."

 

 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:33 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2
Copyright © 2014 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1