Take Full Control of your Razer Blade w/no PL Throttling

Discussion in 'Razer' started by David Kirchik, Mar 8, 2019.

  1. Thysanoptera

    Thysanoptera Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    26
    Messages:
    159
    Likes Received:
    45
    Trophy Points:
    41
    9750h with power limits removed is actually pretty close to stock 8700k, it scales almost linearly with frequency, I'm getting 8700k/9750h ~ 1390/1290 CB15 ~ 4.3/4.0 GHz full turbo frequency. Around 7% slower than desktop, pretty good in my book. I'd get rid of the desktop if it wasn't for Nvdia drivers crashing my system twice a day with 2080Ti in Core X. Vega FE is perfectly stable in the same setup, but too slow
     
  2. Papusan

    Papusan JOKEBOOK's Sucks! Dont waste your $$$ on FILTHY

    Reputations:
    23,409
    Messages:
    23,905
    Likes Received:
    41,573
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Sure.

    38 and 39x http://forum.notebookreview.com/thr...gtx-1080-upgrade.814711/page-66#post-10763864
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    40x http://forum.notebookreview.com/thr...5-owners-lounge.815492/page-147#post-10763407
    [​IMG]

    41x http://forum.notebookreview.com/thr...-w-i9-8950hk-to-the-max.820711/#post-10773495
    [​IMG]

    Stock clocks (43x on all cores)
    [​IMG]

    Edit... i7-8750@3.9GHz +1300
    https://hwbot.org/submission/3964437_kill4l_cinebench___r15_core_i7_8750h_1308_cb
     
    Last edited: Aug 24, 2019
    jc_denton likes this.
  3. Thysanoptera

    Thysanoptera Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    26
    Messages:
    159
    Likes Received:
    45
    Trophy Points:
    41
    But I'm not sure what you're trying to prove? So your 8700k in fine tuned laptop with custom BIOS has CB15 score 70 points higher than my own, bog standard 3 year old desktop, is that such a big deal?
     
  4. Papusan

    Papusan JOKEBOOK's Sucks! Dont waste your $$$ on FILTHY

    Reputations:
    23,409
    Messages:
    23,905
    Likes Received:
    41,573
    Trophy Points:
    931
    You don't need custom bios to perform correct in benchmarks with stock or below clocks. 70cb is +2 bin. And for the records.. The 8700K was used in an laptop from 2015. Aka +4 years old.
     
    jc_denton likes this.
  5. Thysanoptera

    Thysanoptera Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    26
    Messages:
    159
    Likes Received:
    45
    Trophy Points:
    41
    My desktop is actually two years old, from 2017, right after official 8700k release. And I wasn't comparing stock to below clocks but my Razer Blade 15 to my desktop. Both not setup specifically to run benchmarks and sure as hell I'm not going to strip every piece of background software now. Besides you have some golden sample running with -200mV. Even taking your score into consideration, the 9750h is within 11% of 8700k which is still pretty damn close, considering how much less power it consumes.

    And whats with that 2015, Skylake was released at that time.

    EDIT - the max power in throttlestop, was it really 52W@4GHZ? Damn, you have some magic CPU that can handle voltage that low.
     
    Last edited: Aug 24, 2019
  6. Thysanoptera

    Thysanoptera Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    26
    Messages:
    159
    Likes Received:
    45
    Trophy Points:
    41
    upload_2019-8-24_17-37-7.png

    @Papusan - That's my 8700k at 4GHz during CB15 at stock voltage. Whatever you have, I wouldn't call it a stock 8700k.
     
  7. Papusan

    Papusan JOKEBOOK's Sucks! Dont waste your $$$ on FILTHY

    Reputations:
    23,409
    Messages:
    23,905
    Likes Received:
    41,573
    Trophy Points:
    931
    My chips is binned 5.3GHz. But this doesn’t matter with stock clocks or below in benchmarks. Low vid due binned Cpu + great undervolt as well low temps will reduce package power.
    See above. Voltage doesn’t matter in bench with low clock speed and well below throttling temp.
     
  8. jc_denton

    jc_denton Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    1,156
    Messages:
    820
    Likes Received:
    860
    Trophy Points:
    106
    You should also take temperature into consideration, as the chip will run more efficient.
     
  9. Joikansai

    Joikansai Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    157
    Messages:
    1,154
    Likes Received:
    446
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Come on buddy I was jumping happy knowing my jokebook cpu having almost similar Desktop performance:tears:
    Happy enough though can move super tight Razer Power Limit and surpass 1200 marks:notworthy:
     

    Attached Files:

    Papusan likes this.
  10. Papusan

    Papusan JOKEBOOK's Sucks! Dont waste your $$$ on FILTHY

    Reputations:
    23,409
    Messages:
    23,905
    Likes Received:
    41,573
    Trophy Points:
    931
    That’s correct brother. People forget efficiency. See... The power consumption rises with temperature (because of I2R loss). So if his chips run the same test but at much higher Cpu temp, the power consumption will be higher due higher temps.

    Same will happen if you run sub zero temp with phase cooling etc. Chips running -30C vs 0 and you’ll see lower power consumption. This isn’t magic science.
     
    Last edited: Aug 24, 2019
    jc_denton likes this.
Loading...

Share This Page