Sager NP8454 (Clevo PB51RF-G) early impression

Discussion in 'Sager and Clevo' started by Sabs47, Jul 6, 2019.

  1. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    8,461
    Messages:
    53,196
    Likes Received:
    15,293
    Trophy Points:
    931
    L1 cache at 12gb? That's a big chip ;)
     
  2. Mark J Foster

    Mark J Foster Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    2
    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    26
    Maybe we can beat up the cache folks, and get 'em to start calling theirs L4, L5 and L6! ;)
     
    Last edited: Sep 11, 2019
  3. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    8,461
    Messages:
    53,196
    Likes Received:
    15,293
    Trophy Points:
    931
    I will have to try out some optane at some point, add another level to it all ;)
     
  4. Papusan

    Papusan JOKEBOOK's Sucks! Dont waste your $$$ on FILTHY

    Reputations:
    25,093
    Messages:
    24,598
    Likes Received:
    43,315
    Trophy Points:
    931
    And the useless PassMark bench test won't let you get an new score on the leaderboard if you don't score above 5% higher next time.
     
  5. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    8,461
    Messages:
    53,196
    Likes Received:
    15,293
    Trophy Points:
    931
    That does discourage optimising your run which is a bit odd for a benchmark.
     
  6. Papusan

    Papusan JOKEBOOK's Sucks! Dont waste your $$$ on FILTHY

    Reputations:
    25,093
    Messages:
    24,598
    Likes Received:
    43,315
    Trophy Points:
    931
  7. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    8,461
    Messages:
    53,196
    Likes Received:
    15,293
    Trophy Points:
    931
    5% is a lot, as he says odd they don't let you retire and replace.
     
  8. Papusan

    Papusan JOKEBOOK's Sucks! Dont waste your $$$ on FILTHY

    Reputations:
    25,093
    Messages:
    24,598
    Likes Received:
    43,315
    Trophy Points:
    931
    This is bad if you already posted near pik overclock scores first time.


    Could probably replace old with new scores if you swapped from old spinning HDD to faster NVMe ssd’s:vbbiggrin:
     
  9. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    8,461
    Messages:
    53,196
    Likes Received:
    15,293
    Trophy Points:
    931
    To be fair your actual expereince would improve a lot with that too ;)
     
    Papusan likes this.
  10. Mark J Foster

    Mark J Foster Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    2
    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    26
    Well, every benchmark has its idiosyncrasies. With enough optimization (getting RAM to 15-16-16-36-32 @ 3100 MHz), UserBenchmark's starting to whine. I've gotten to the point where I'm at 98% (only 2 out of 100 machines higher), but it insists that my drives are cached, even when PrimoCache, Intel RST and Windows caches are all turned off! As a result, it won't even report Gaming/Desktop/Workstation numbers at this level.

    Things do get weird when you need to make your machine in reality slower, in order to satisfy the benchmark! o_O

    P.S. The machine passes MemTest86 just fine
     
    Last edited: Sep 13, 2019
Loading...

Share This Page