Pascal: What do we know? Discussion, Latest News & Updates: 1000M Series GPU's

Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by J.Dre, Oct 11, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. HTWingNut

    HTWingNut Potato

    Reputations:
    21,578
    Messages:
    35,409
    Likes Received:
    9,862
    Trophy Points:
    931
    TRUMP for President 2016!
     
    TomJGX and hmscott like this.
  2. hmscott

    hmscott Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    6,402
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    24,511
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Perhaps a little more likely than PASCAL in 2016? :confused::cool::p:D:eek::oops::rolleyes:o_O
     
    TomJGX, jaybee83, Ethrem and 2 others like this.
  3. Ionising_Radiation

    Ionising_Radiation ?v = ve*ln(m0/m1)

    Reputations:
    633
    Messages:
    2,625
    Likes Received:
    2,238
    Trophy Points:
    181
    God bless you all if that happens...
     
    hmscott and moviemarketing like this.
  4. HTWingNut

    HTWingNut Potato

    Reputations:
    21,578
    Messages:
    35,409
    Likes Received:
    9,862
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Bingo! :)
     
  5. n=1

    n=1 YEAH SCIENCE!

    Reputations:
    2,544
    Messages:
    4,346
    Likes Received:
    2,600
    Trophy Points:
    231
    I'll just say if you sat down and spent some time looking at TSMC's past failures, and how they just seem to find some way to screw up every node since 40nm, and how their roadmaps keep getting changed year after year, you'll have much less faith in TSMC than you do currently.

    For the record I don't have any exclusive sources, and I still believe Ethrem when he says TSMC screwed up again, because sadly that's they do and what they're best at.
     
    hmscott likes this.
  6. J.Dre

    J.Dre Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    3,700
    Messages:
    8,316
    Likes Received:
    3,819
    Trophy Points:
    431
    I don't have any faith in TSMC. I was asking Ethrem to share his source because he's mentioned it a dozen times now and always says he can't share a source.

    You are all taking things out of context. It wasn't meant to be offensive or anything...

    My apologies to anyone who was offended, but it was meant to be frank humor.
     
    jaybee83 and hmscott like this.
  7. HTWingNut

    HTWingNut Potato

    Reputations:
    21,578
    Messages:
    35,409
    Likes Received:
    9,862
    Trophy Points:
    931
    I hear ya. Very little anyone knows for sure, but someone constantly stating unsourced rumors just gets old quick. I don't doubt that he has some evidence or third hand information but without some sort of backup it's hard to take seriously. Honestly stating what he knows wouldn't do anything against him because it sounds like third hand and he's not bound by any NDA or an employee of the company.
     
  8. AlwaysSearching

    AlwaysSearching Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    164
    Messages:
    334
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Wish you would reconsider. There are members here that like to hear your comments especially
    in speculation threads.
     
    hmscott likes this.
  9. tgipier

    tgipier Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    197
    Messages:
    1,596
    Likes Received:
    1,572
    Trophy Points:
    181
    Considering its TSMC we are talking about, I would assume they screwed up... somehow and instead ask for proves they DIDNT screw up.
    The second possibility is far less imo.
     
    n=1 and hmscott like this.
  10. n=1

    n=1 YEAH SCIENCE!

    Reputations:
    2,544
    Messages:
    4,346
    Likes Received:
    2,600
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Pretty much. When it comes to TSMC, I just assume they already screwed up (pre-screwed up? :p) until I see reliable evidence to the contrary.
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page