*Official* NBR Desktop Overclocker's Lounge [laptop owners welcome, too]

Discussion in 'Desktop Hardware' started by Mr. Fox, Nov 5, 2017.

  1. Mr. Fox

    Mr. Fox Undefiled BGA-Hating Elitist

    Reputations:
    23,040
    Messages:
    32,188
    Likes Received:
    45,271
    Trophy Points:
    931
    The workload from this test is unrealistically harsh and totally unwarranted. There is no point at all in running it because at 5.0GHz with -2 AVX offset the temps are 8°-10°C hotter and easily 20-25W more than I have ever seen doing anything else at 5.2GHz with 0 AVX offset. I've never seen temps as high and my 8700K exceeds 200W. So, long story short, I see no benefit whatsoever to using it.

    x264-64.PNG
     
  2. Raiderman

    Raiderman Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    462
    Messages:
    746
    Likes Received:
    1,722
    Trophy Points:
    156
  3. Raiderman

    Raiderman Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    462
    Messages:
    746
    Likes Received:
    1,722
    Trophy Points:
    156
  4. KY_BULLET

    KY_BULLET Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    755
    Messages:
    653
    Likes Received:
    775
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Finally broke 26k! FireStrike2.PNG
     
  5. TANWare

    TANWare Just This Side of Senile, I think. Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    2,320
    Messages:
    8,992
    Likes Received:
    4,126
    Trophy Points:
    431
    I have it now, and like Fox I see a good 40w higher total package usage than even OCCT.
     
    hmscott, Mr. Fox, KY_BULLET and 2 others like this.
  6. Raiderman

    Raiderman Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    462
    Messages:
    746
    Likes Received:
    1,722
    Trophy Points:
    156
    New toy installed
    [​IMG]

    Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk
     
    hmscott, Robbo99999, Mr. Fox and 2 others like this.
  7. TANWare

    TANWare Just This Side of Senile, I think. Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    2,320
    Messages:
    8,992
    Likes Received:
    4,126
    Trophy Points:
    431
    Put in the 2 960 EVO drives. Great for benchmarks but other than a slightly faster to desktop I do not feel much of a real world benefit yet to the drives over the 1TB SATA 2.5' SSD.

    http://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/7413412
    UserBenchmarks: Game 144%, Desk 145%, Work 173%
    CPU: AMD Ryzen TR 1950X - 119.1%
    GPU: Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti - 173.5%
    SSD: Mushkin Reactor 1TB - 78.5%
    SSD: Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB - 228.9%
    SSD: Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB - 237.7%
    HDD: Toshiba P300 3TB - 92.8%
    USB: WDC WD10 EURX-63C57Y0 1TB - 49.3%
    USB: TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB - 38.2%
    RAM: Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3466 C16 4x8GB - 170.5%
    MBD: Asrock X399 Taichi


    PassmarkEVO960.jpg

    CDM_EVO960_C.jpg

    CDM_EVO960.jpg

    CDM_L.jpg
     
    Last edited: Feb 19, 2018
  8. Robbo99999

    Robbo99999 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    3,264
    Messages:
    5,616
    Likes Received:
    4,229
    Trophy Points:
    431
    Weird, I see 15W less power consumption using that x264 test vs OCCT! My finding also tallies with what they say in that thread with x264 being a middle ground stability test. However, I do have a Skylake CPU, and that's a Skylake thread, maybe the later Intel CPUs and Ryzen CPUs go nuts with power consumption on x264, maybe something to do with the different architectures.
     
    Last edited: Feb 19, 2018
    hmscott, Mr. Fox and Raiderman like this.
  9. TANWare

    TANWare Just This Side of Senile, I think. Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    2,320
    Messages:
    8,992
    Likes Received:
    4,126
    Trophy Points:
    431
    Yeah, Ryzen seems to use higher wattage and subsequent heat.
     
    Raiderman and KY_BULLET like this.
  10. Mr. Fox

    Mr. Fox Undefiled BGA-Hating Elitist

    Reputations:
    23,040
    Messages:
    32,188
    Likes Received:
    45,271
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Yeah, must be something like that. Definitely not a middle-ground test for me.
     
Loading...

Share This Page