Honda NSX

Discussion in 'Motorized Vehicles' started by Spartan, Jan 26, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Spartan

    Spartan Super Tweaker

    Reputations:
    26,100
    Messages:
    21,759
    Likes Received:
    32,761
    Trophy Points:
    931
  2. saturnotaku

    saturnotaku Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    4,128
    Messages:
    7,573
    Likes Received:
    3,095
    Trophy Points:
    431
    It's neat but not $156,000 neat.
     
  3. Mitlov

    Mitlov Shiny

    Reputations:
    2,676
    Messages:
    5,687
    Likes Received:
    882
    Trophy Points:
    281
    Yeah, it's exciting to see some life in Honda again (when I got my 2011 Civic Si, it was basically the last remotely-enthusiastic car they sold), and I think they absolutely nailed the styling...but I'd rather that the NSX was a five-figure-price Corvette fighter than a six-figure-price Ferrari-fighter.
     
  4. Jarhead

    Jarhead 恋の♡アカサタナ

    Reputations:
    4,990
    Messages:
    12,178
    Likes Received:
    2,981
    Trophy Points:
    581
    So why would someone buy this NSX when the Nissan GT-R is $30k-$50k less?
     
    Spartan likes this.
  5. saturnotaku

    saturnotaku Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    4,128
    Messages:
    7,573
    Likes Received:
    3,095
    Trophy Points:
    431
    Thing is, those original NSX models have skyrocketed in value. A low mileage survivor can fetch upwards of $125,000.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
    Spartan likes this.
  6. Spartan

    Spartan Super Tweaker

    Reputations:
    26,100
    Messages:
    21,759
    Likes Received:
    32,761
    Trophy Points:
    931
    True, no matter how much power it has, it's still a Honda.
     
    Knight666 likes this.
  7. Knight666

    Knight666 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    26
    Messages:
    251
    Likes Received:
    173
    Trophy Points:
    56
    GTR is much better. At least in my "noone cares" opinion :p
    Still Honda is Honda, looks great, sounds cool but... it's slowest supercar on the market... but to be honest... how many owners would use it on track? Mostly for dialy driving and showing up - you dont need any empty horsepower here.

    Still... I would like to see Dodge Charger (or family Charger) Hellcat version than this. :p
     
  8. Jarhead

    Jarhead 恋の♡アカサタナ

    Reputations:
    4,990
    Messages:
    12,178
    Likes Received:
    2,981
    Trophy Points:
    581
    You have a fair point with the speed, but then the problem is: why spend this much money on a "slow" car?

    Really, the only "slow" car I'd buy would be a luxury car (or I suppose an expensive truck, RV, etc). For the same money or less, you can buy more performance. Likewise, for the same money or less, you can buy a much more comfortable car.
     
  9. Knight666

    Knight666 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    26
    Messages:
    251
    Likes Received:
    173
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Like a Chevy Suburban with badass V8 engine. Or... Cadillac... Lexus... etc.

    I would choose rather something from: GTR, Charger/Challenger Hellcat, Camaro Z28 and... most money in pocket. I would spend rest on a second car for terrain fun (like Hilux, F150 or even Ranger).

    Currently sportcars like lambo, ferrari, nsx (etc) class is just only for showing up, and sooooometimes show good numbers on track. But... noone likes Nurburgring :D
    I will never buy car tested & almost designed for Nurburgring. :p
     
  10. Support.2@XOTIC PC

    Support.2@XOTIC PC Company Representative

    Reputations:
    486
    Messages:
    3,148
    Likes Received:
    3,489
    Trophy Points:
    331
    Agreed. If you're not doing track days, why have something that's built for the track?
     
    Jarhead likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page