Firmware TPM 2.0 vs Discrete TPM 1.2?

Discussion in 'Security and Anti-Virus Software' started by Starlight5, Dec 30, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Starlight5

    Starlight5 So what if I'm crazy? The best people are.

    Reputations:
    506
    Messages:
    2,878
    Likes Received:
    1,340
    Trophy Points:
    181
    So I read a few comparisons between 2.0 and 1.2 and honestly they don't tell me much of use. I also read about problems with TPM 2.0 on certain notebooks, though, resulting in worse performance etc, and that Intel SGX which seems to be an essential part of TPM 2.0 is a pile of potentially exploitable crap. Am I missing something, or is TPM 2.0, especially it's firmware-based implementation (fTPM), just bad compared to good old discrete TPM1.2?
     
  2. Ultra Male

    Ultra Male Super Tweaker

    Reputations:
    20,085
    Messages:
    20,269
    Likes Received:
    29,291
    Trophy Points:
    931
    I don't know the answer to your question but I always disable the Intel SGX Extension in the BIOS otherwise my Logitech Mouse would jerk and stutter. Intel SGX is only for developers not for the general or even power users. I don't know why a lot of laptop manufacturers have it enabled by default, it only does harm but no good.
     
    Starlight5 likes this.
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page