Defragmenter in Vista taking to long or not working

Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by PCPAL, Oct 2, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. PCPAL

    PCPAL Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    6
    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    Messages:
    107
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    After four hours the Vista defragmenter was still defragmenting the hard drive. Why is it taking to long?
    OS is vista ultimate.
     
  2. John B

    John B Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    1,767
    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    4,195
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    It could be a normal thing...Reasons: maybe you never did a defrag before or it was a long time ago, maybe a lot of data has changed on your disk, maybe you have an antivirus or any other program that makes the defrag often restart...
     
  3. PCPAL

    PCPAL Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    6
    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    Messages:
    107
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    That long? Just last month I did a clean install of ultimate. Thanks.
     
  4. John B

    John B Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    1,767
    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    4,195
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Yes it's possible...but take a look to see if there is a progress at least in % from time to time

    Don't forget that you have a 5400 RPM so it's even more longer than with a 7200RPM regular desktop PC disk

    The best is to let it run while being away from computer, also try to close as many programs as possible (including antivirus) and don't forget to disable sleep
     
  5. PCPAL

    PCPAL Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    6
    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    Messages:
    107
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    In vista there is no percentage meter. At least I can't find one. I'll try to defrag it again tonight before I hit the sack. Thanks.
     
  6. DMANbluesfreak

    DMANbluesfreak Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    17
    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2007
    Messages:
    153
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Yeah vista defragmenter sucks... try Auslogics Defragmenter. It goes at least 2-3 times as fast and does a better job.
     
  7. R4000

    R4000 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    736
    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2006
    Messages:
    2,762
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I second this. Auslogics has worked well for me. Here is the latest updated version http://www.auslogics.com/disk-defrag/index.php
     
  8. Andromeda

    Andromeda Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    25
    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2007
    Messages:
    144
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Vista's defragmenter has no option to see the progress display or to gauge when the defrag will be complete. As I've said before, it's a great idea i.e. automatic system defrag- but poorly implemented by Microsoft. Sadly, it looks like SP1 won't fix the broken Vista defragger apart from giving an option of selecting the volumes on which it will run. If it worked properly, then it would have been killer - fully automatic and smart defrag without the user needing to do a thing...unlike manual or scheduled defrag.
     
  9. mmk1125

    mmk1125 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    11
    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2007
    Messages:
    81
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Personally I find the progress bar and colour blocks redundant in Vista defrag. I run it once a week and I always leave it running in the background while I do whatever I need on the notebook except gaming. Check back in a few hours and it's done. Never timed it myself but I don't remember it taken longer than 2 hours on my 100GB HDD about 80% full.

    I see many recommendations with Auslogics Defrag. Used it before on XP and I agree it is fast, too fast in fact. Sometimes I wonder if it did its job probably or not. I have my reserve with its proclaimed n% performance gain after defrag to be honest.
     
  10. R4000

    R4000 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    736
    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2006
    Messages:
    2,762
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    In my case, it usually reports nil performance gain or 1% on a busy week, as I defrag quite often.

    What I found interesting is watching the program as it's proccessing the clusters of each file (of certain size). That is one thing I never saw in any native Windows defragger, as it was never intimately shown what was going on. :)
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page