Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Mr. Fox, Apr 18, 2020.
Look better than ultra in most games from a decade ago, maybe...
you mean 5 years ago.....crysis 1 looked better on ultra than other games on ultra for a decade roughly 2017.....farcry 3-4 being an example.....this remastered cannot be touched
yes the mountains look nice but crysis is untouchable
Witcher 2, Crysis 2, and Battlefield 3 came out nearly a decade ago...
bf3 crysis 2 the witcher 2 are not as good looking.....crysis 2 was a downgrade
I think Crysis Remastered is too bright. Lowered the gamma setting a bit (around 40%) improved the visual. Default slider position is around 52-53%.
So far I’m happy with DLSS 2.0 boosted performance. However, this game is still CPU limited. I hope the developers can improve this in future updates.
at first I was only using 4 cores....then they updated the game and it was using 6 cores now its back to 4 cores not sure why...but yeah its cpu limited now
Crysis 2 DX11 was certainly not a downgrade in fidelity. It had techniques like tessellation, SMAA temporal supersampling, screen space reflections, bokeh, contact hardening shadows, and particle motion blur and shadows that didn’t even exist in Crysis 1’s engine. Those 2011 era games on ultra certainly look better than Crysis Remastered on low.
gimmicks....overall crysis 1 looked better than 2...also crysis remastered on low looks the same on ultra obviously you have not played it.....not trying to argue as the main point is it looks great....end of story so ill comprimise and say its up to personal preferance..
I’ve seen your screenshots. Meh, nothing special.
Separate names with a comma.