All about 5G Technologies

Discussion in 'Smartphones and Tablets' started by The Strategist, Apr 17, 2017.

  1. The Strategist

    The Strategist Living with Hope

    Reputations:
    2,704
    Messages:
    1,822
    Likes Received:
    3,883
    Trophy Points:
    281
    Yes, but it's not about locations anymore, IoT, All smart devices and technologies, AI, ML, Bigdata, Cloud computing ,,,etc They all need more bandwidth to be effective. They don't care about human health, it's all about Intelligence and more control. Even the whales in the oceans were not excluded from the damage.
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2019
    hmscott likes this.
  2. hmscott

    hmscott Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    6,200
    Messages:
    19,423
    Likes Received:
    24,181
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Race to 5g needs to take public health into account.JPG
    https://twitter.com/berkeleyprc/status/1099868747576168448

    The race to 5G technology needs to take public health into account
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.19a9f5eb536d
    By Linnea Warren, Washington
    Letters to the Editor February 24, 2019
    Regarding the Feb. 20 2019 Economy & Business article “U.S. has strong start in race for 5G, report says”:

    "The telecom industry touts 5G’s future benefits, most of which are still speculative, while ignoring its significant costs. Not everyone in Congress agrees that rapid deployment of 5G is a national imperative. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and Rep. Anna G. Eshoo (D-Calif.) first want proof that it’s safe.

    It’s unlikely they’ll get any, because the Federal Communications Commission has protected its pet industry for years. It prohibits objections to wireless devices on health grounds as long as they comply with radio-frequency radiation guidelines adopted in 1996 and never updated for newer technology.

    It rejected the first national study done since then, which found clear evidence linking 2G and 3G to cancer in rats, as irrelevant to humans. And it only considers effects caused by heating, ignoring the serious nonthermal effects.

    Up until now, most of the public’s exposure to radio-frequency radiation has come from handheld devices. Upon deployment of the dense networks of small cells planned for 5G, which will also have 4G antennas to fill in bandwidth gaps, public exposure will reach a whole new level of magnitude.

    Thousands of independent scientific studies have shown that the electromagnetic radio waves that transmit wireless signals seriously damage living tissues — in humans, animals, even plants.

    Ironically, other countries have responded by adopting far stricter RF exposure standards than the United States — including China."

    Joel Moskowitz Retweeted
    5g questions.JPG
    https://twitter.com/blogBRHP/status/1100394850980163584
    https://twitter.com/berkeleyprc

    Dr. Joel Moskowitz Wins Journalism Freedom of Information Award

    APRIL 29, 2018
    https://mdsafetech.org/2018/04/29/dr-joel-moskowitz-wins-journalists-freedom-of-information-award/

    "On March 27, 2018, Berkeley professor Dr. Joel Moskowitz, was presented with the James Madison Freedom of Information Award by the Society for Professional Journalists for his work uncovering the California Department of Public Health(CDPH) Recommendations on How to Reduce Exposure to Radiofrequency Energy from Cell Phones.

    Dr. Moskowitz, who is the director of the Center for Family and Community Health at UC Berkeley’s School of Public Health, knew of the CDPH guidelines since 2013, however they had never been published. He found out that the CDPH had been working on safe cell phone guidelines since 2009. After many requests to the CDPH for release of these recommendations he filed a lawsuit in 2016 against the CDPH through the Freedom of Information Act. After the successful lawsuit, a Sacramento judge ordered that the CDPH release the documents and a 2 page draft copy, not to be released to the public was sent to Dr. Moskowitz in March 2017.

    In a March 2017 SF Gate article about the CDPH draft release, it was noted that Superior Court Judge Shelleyanne Chang stated the CDPH does have an obligation to inform the public about public health issues gathered by it’s own scientists.

    Dr. Moskowitz has been involved in educating others about the science indicating harm from wireless radiation for almost a decade. He, along with over 230 other international EMF peer reviewed scientists, have signed a petition, calling for the UN to issue new standards for non-ionizing electromagnetic that are protective of human and environmental health.

    Professor Moskowitz was also instrumental in passing Berkeley’s Cell Phone Right to Know ordinance, the first in the Nation to require cell phone sellers to post a brief warning in their stores about the hazards of cell phone radiation. This is similar to the warning cell phone manufacturers include in the fine print of their phone manuals and that few people ever read. Despite appeals and lawsuits by the telecommunications industry the Berkeley ordinance so far has prevailed, however, it may be challenged in the Supreme Court.

    The Berkeley cell phone ordinance required posting reads “To assure safety, the Federal Government requires that cell phones meet radio frequency (RF) exposure guidelines. If you carry or use your phone in a pants or shirt pocket or tucked into a bra when the phone is ON and connected to a wireless network, you may exceed the federal guidelines for exposure to RF radiation. This potential risk is greater for children. Refer to the instructions in your phone or user manual for information about how to use your phone safely.”

    Dr. Moskowitz has his own website https://www.saferemr.com with up to date information for the public, scientists and officials.

    Related Articles

    Berkeley Cell Phone "Right to Know" Ordinance: Media Coverage

    Updates on the Berkeley cell phone "right to know" ordinance:
    Saturday, September 22, 2018
    http://bit.ly/berkeleycellordinance.

    "Since July, 2014, more than 200 news stories have been published regarding the cell phone “right to know” ordinance that the Berkeley City Council unanimously adopted on May 12, 2015.

    An Associated Press (AP) story published on June 11, 2015 appeared on more than 100 web sites throughout the U.S. including the New York Times, the Washington Post, and ABC News. An AP story published on September 22, 2015 appeared on more than 155 new sites in the U.S. and Canada.

    News stories about the ordinance have appeared in thirteen other nations: Australia, Canada, China, India, Indonesia, Iran, Kenya, Lithuania, New Zealand, Switzerland, Taiwan, United Kingdom, and Vietnam.

    For regular updates about the status of the ordinance and the lawsuit filed by the CTIA--The Wireless Association in the industry's effort to kill this landmark consumer disclosure law see http://bit.ly/berkeleycellordinance.

    ABA Journal (Sep 22, 2015)
    ABC 7 News (San Francisco) (Jul 15, 2014)
    ABC 7 News (San Francisco) (Aug 20, 2015)
    ABC 7 News (San Francisco) (Sep 13, 2016)
    Apple Daily (Taiwan) (Mar 23, 2016
    Apple Daily (Taiwan) (Mar 23, 2016)
    Ars Technica (Jun 9, 2015)
    Ars Technica (Aug 20, 2015)
    Ars Technica (Sep 21, 2015)
    Ars Technica (Jan 28, 2016)
    Ars Technica (Sep 13, 2016)
    Ars Technica (Apr 21, 2017)
    Associated Press (Jun 11, 2015) - published on more than 100 news sites
    Associated Press (Sep 22, 2015) - published on more than 155 news sites in US & Canada
    Associated Press (Jan 28, 2016)
    Australian Mobile Telecommunications Association (Nov 13, 2014)
    BannedBook.org (in Mandarin) (July 15, 2014)
    Bay City News (Sep 22, 2015)
    Bayvoice.net (in Mandarin) (July 14, 2014)
    Berkeley Daily Planet (Sep 21, 2015)
    Berkeley Daily Planet (Sep 13, 2016)
    Berkeley Daily Planet (Oct 11, 2017)
    Berkeley High Jacket (Dec 20, 2014)
    Berkeley Patch (Bay City News) (Sep 13, 2016)
    Berkeleyside Op-Ed (Oct 17, 2014)
    Berkeleyside (Nov 18, 2014)
    Berkeleyside (Nov 26, 2014)
    Berkeleyside Op-Ed (May 5, 2015)
    Berkeleyside (May 13, 2015)
    Berkeleyside (Jun 8, 2015)
    Berkeleyside (Aug 21, 2015)
    Berkeleyside (Sep 22, 2015)
    Berkeleyside (Jan 29, 2016)
    Bloomberg News Radio (mp3: 0:06:55 - 0:08:35) (Jul 15, 2014)
    Bloomberg Politics (Nov 26, 2014)
    Bloomberg BNA (Sep 22, 2015)
    Bloomberg BNA (Oct 20, 2016)
    Breitbart News (Jul 15, 2014)
    Breitbart News (Jun 10, 2015)
    Business Insider (Jul 15, 2014)
    Business Insider Australia (Jul 16, 2014)
    Business Insider India (Jul 15, 2014)
    California City News (Dec 1, 2014)
    California Healthline (Jul 16, 2014)
    California Healthline (Sep 23, 2015)
    California Magazine (Aug 19, 2014)
    Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC)--The National (Mar 23, 2017)
    CBC Marketplace (Mar 24, 2017) (22 minute video)
    CBS News (May 12, 2015)
    CBS News (May 13, 2015)
    CBS News (Jun 8, 2015)
    CBS Sacramento (Jan 28, 2016)
    CBS SF Bay Area (Aug 22, 2014)
    CBS SF Bay Area (Jul 16, 2014)
    CBS SF Bay Area (May 13, 2015)
    CBS SF Bay Area (May 20, 2015)
    CBS SF Bay Area (Jun 8, 2015)
    CBS SF Bay Area (Jul 27, 2015)
    CBS SF Bay Area (Sep 13, 2016)
    CBS SF Bay Area (Oct 11, 2017)
    CBS SF Bay Area (Sep 20, 2018)
    CBS This Morning (Jul 27, 2015)
    Channel One News (May 17, 2017)
    Chico Enterprise-Record (Nov 21, 2014)
    c|net (Jun 28, 2018)
    CNN (Jul 28, 2015)
    CIO India (Jun 9, 2015)
    Computerworld (Jun 8, 2015)
    Computerworld Australia (Jun 8, 2015)
    Computerworld New Zealand (Jun 8, 2015)
    Consumer Reports (Sep 24, 2015)
    Contra Costa Times (Nov 21, 2014) (Oakland Tribune, Nov 24, 2014)
    Contra Costa Times (Oct 7, 2015)
    Contra Costa Times (Jan 28, 2016)
    Contra Costa Times (Mar 8, 2016)
    Courthouse News Service (Jun 9, 2015)
    Courthouse News Service (Aug 20, 2015)
    Courthouse News Service (Sep 22, 2015)
    Courthouse News Service (Jan 22, 2016)
    Courthouse News Service (Jan 28, 2016)
    Courthouse News Service (Sep 13, 2016)
    Courthouse News Service (Apr 21, 2017)
    Courthouse News Service (Oct 11, 2017)
    Daily Beast (May 13, 2015)
    Daily Californian (Jul 16, 2014)
    Daily Californian (Nov 19, 2014)
    Daily Californian (Jun 9, 2015)
    Daily Californian (Sep 22, 2015)
    Daily Californian (Feb 1, 2016)
    Daily Californian (Sep 14, 2016)
    Daily Californian (Apr 25, 2017)
    Daily Californian (Sep 22, 2018)
    Daily Online Examiner (May 12, 2017)
    Davis Enterprise (Jul 22, 2014)
    Delfi Sveikata (Lithuania) (May 21, 2015)
    Digital News Daily (Oct 11, 2017)
    Digital Trends (Aug 1, 2015)
    Discovery News (May 20, 2015)
    East Bay Express (Jul 15, 2014)
    East Bay Times (Apr 22, 2017)
    East Bay Times (Oct 12, 2017)
    East Bay Times (Jan 17, 2018)

    (still adding links - hmscott)

    ECN Magazine (Jun 10, 2015)
    Ecosalon (Jul 18, 2014)
    Epoch Times (May 12, 2015)
    FairWarning (Jul 11, 2018)
    FairWarning (Sep 4, 2018)
    Fierce Wireless (Jun 9, 2015)
    Fierce Wireless (Sep 22, 2015)
    FindLaw (Apr 26, 2017)
    First World News Channel (Sep 13, 2016)
    Forbes (Oct 13, 2015)
    Fox Business (Sep 22, 2015)
    Fusion (May 3, 2016)
    GSMA (wireless industry assn.) (Nov 24, 2014)
    GSMA (May 25, 2015)
    GSMA (Jul 13, 2015)
    GSMA (Oct 29, 2015)
    The Guardian (London, UK) May 15, 2015)
    Headlines and Global News (Jul 17, 2014)
    Healthcare Global (Dec 1, 2014)
    The Hill (Jun 5, 2015)
    The Hill (Sep 22, 2015)
    Huffington Post (Paul Brodeur), (Jul 27, 2015)
    Inside Towers (Sep 30, 2016)
    International Business Times UK (Jun 10, 2015)
    Journal of the American Medical Association (Aug 1, 2016)
    Journal of the American Medical Association (Oct 18, 2016)
    Justia US Law (Apr 21, 2017)
    Kachwanya (Kenya) (Aug 6, 2015)
    KALW Crosscurrents (audio - Sep 24, 2014)
    KALW (audio) (Oct 8, 2015)
    KFMB (CBS8, San Diego), Sep 27, 2016
    KGO 810 Radio News (San Francisco) (Jul 15, 2014)
    Kim Komando podcast (Apr 6, 2017)
    KIMT (Iowa, Minnesota) (May 18, 2015)
    The Kirk Show
    KKSF AM Talk 919 (San Francisco) (audio) (Jul 15, 2014)
    KPAX (Missoula, MT, CBS News8) (May 12, 2015)
    KPFA Radio (May 13, 2015)
    KPFA Pacifica Evening News (42:13 - 44:30)(Sep 30, 2016)
    KQED Forum (Lawrence Lessig interview: 48:00 - 50:00) (Jan 8, 2015)
    KQED Forum (Joel Moskowitz & Allan Balmain, 9:30 - 10 AM) (May 18, 2015)
    KRON4 (Sep 22, 2015)
    KRON4 (Sep 13, 2016)
    KTVU (Fox News) (May 13, 2015)
    KTVU (Fox News) Sep 13, 2016)
    Law 360 (Jun 9, 2015)
    Law 360 (Sep 22, 2016)
    Law 360 (Jan 28, 2016)
    Law 360 (Mar 2, 2016)
    Law 360 (Apr 5, 2016)
    Law 360 (Apr 26, 2016)
    Law 360 (May 10, 2016)
    Law 360 (May 13, 2016)
    Law 360 (Aug 12, 2016)
    Law 360 (Aug 29, 2016)
    Law 360 (Sep 13, 2016)
    Law 360 (Apr 21, 2017)
    Legal Reader (Sep 24, 2015)
    Lexology (Apr 28, 2017)
    Litigation Update - State Bar of California (Nov, 2017)
    Los Angeles Times (Jun 9, 2015)
    McClatchy Washington News Bureau (Jul 11, 2018)
    Mobile Commerce News (Aug 7, 2015)
    Mobile Today (Iran) (Sep 13, 2016)
    Mother Jones (May 11, 2015)
    Mother Jones (May 13, 2015)
    NBC Bay Area (Mar 28, 2015)
    NBC Bay Area (May 12, 2015)
    NBC Bay Area (Jun 8, 2015)
    NBC Bay Area (Aug 20, 2015)
    NBC Bay Area (Mar 21, 2016)
    NBC Bay Area (Sep 13, 2016)
    NBC Sacramento/SF Gate (Apr 8, 2017)
    Newser (Jun 10, 2015)
    News Inferno (Jul 16, 2014)
    Newsweek (Nov 3, 2016)
    Newsweek en Espanol (Nov 4, 2016)
    New York Magazine (Jul 24, 2015)
    New York Times (Jun 11, 2015) - AP article
    New York Times (Jul 21, 2015) (my comments on NYT article)
    Northern California Record (Oct 22, 2016)
    PAN Swiss Newsroom
    PC Advisor (UK) (Jun 8, 2015)
    PC World (Jun 8, 2015)
    PC World (Jul 10, 2015)
    Public Health Watchdog (Jul 17, 2014)
    Public Knowledge (May 25, 2016)
    Public News Service (Aug 20, 2015)
    Public News Service (Sep 29, 2016)
    RCR Wireless News (Jun 9, 2015)
    RCR Wireless News (Jun 11, 2015)
    The Recorder (Jun 8, 2015)
    The Recorder (Aug 20, 2015)
    The Recorder (Aug 21, 2015)
    The Recorder (Sep 21, 2015)
    The Recorder (Sep 13, 2016)
    The Recorder (Apr 21, 2017)
    The Recorder (Oct 11, 2017)
    Reuters (Apr 24, 2017)
    RT (May 12, 2015)
    RT (Jul 31, 2015)
    RYOT News (May 14, 2015)
    Sacramento Bee (Apr 6, 2017)
    San Francisco Appeal (Sep 21, 2015)
    San Francisco Chronicle (Jul 15, 2014)
    San Francisco Chronicle (Sep 25, 2015)
    San Francisco Chronicle (Mar 2, 2017)
    San Francisco Chronicle (Jun 28, 2018)
    San Jose Mercury News (May 13, 2015)
    San Jose Mercury News (Jun 9, 2015)
    San Jose Mercury News (Sep 22, 2015)
    San Jose Mercury News (Oct 7, 2015)
    San Jose Mercury News (Jan 17, 2018)
    Science Times (May 13, 2015)
    Seattle Times (Jul 14, 2014)
    SF Gate / SF Chronicle (Jun 8, 2015)
    SF Gate (Aug 20, 2015)
    SF Gate (Sep 21, 2015)
    SF Gate (Jan 28, 2016)
    SF Gate (Mar 23, 2016)
    SF Gate (Sep 13, 2016)
    SF Gate (Apr 21, 2017)
    SoundofHope.org (Beijing; in Mandarin) (Jul 15, 2014)
    Sputnik International (Jul 31, 2015)
    Sputnik News (May 17, 2015)
    Telecommunications Reports (Jul 13, 2018)
    ThinkProgress (Jul 22, 2015)
    TIME Magazine (May 12, 2015)
    TreeAngle (Indonesia) (Sep 23, 2015)
    Tuoi Tre (Vietnam) (Mar 23, 2016)
    UK Progressive Magazine (May 19, 2015)
    Voice of America (Jun 5, 2015)
    Wall Street Journal (Sep 22, 2015)
    WCTV News (CBS2, Tallahassee, FL) (May 12, 2015)
    WCVB News (ABC5, Boston) (Jul 15, 2014)
    WDTV News (CBS5, West Virginia) (May 12, 2015)
    WFMY News (CBS2, Greensboro, NC) (May 12, 2015)
    WIVB News (CBS4, Buffalo, NY) (May 13, 2015)
    WKBN News (Youngstown, OH) (May 12, 2015)
    WREQ News (CBS3 Memphis,TN) (May 12, 2015)
    WTSP News (CBS10, Tampa Bay, FL) (May 12, 2015)
    Yahoo! Finance (Sep 27, 2016)
    Yahoo! News (CBS) (Jul 16, 2014)
    Yahoo! News (CBS) (May 12, 2015)
    YourLawyer.com (Jul 17, 2014)

    Electromagnetic Radiation Safety
    Recent Posts on EMR Safety, Friday, February 22, 2019
    https://www.saferemr.com/

    The 5G mass-experiment: Big promises, unknown risks
    Investigate Europe
    https://www.investigate-europe.eu/publications/the-5g-mass-experiment/
    Published on Jan 13, 2019
    An new investigation by Investigate Europe
    Europe is about to go through a giant technological transformation, one that will bring us “smart homes”, “smart cities” and the much-hyped “internet of things”. The vehicle for this transformation is 5G, the fifth-generation mobile service. 5G will allow countless appliances and everyday objects to be connected to the internet at all times. It will bring driverless cars, hologram images instead of video, smart fridges, nappies, washing machines, electricity circuits, coffee machines, your blood sugar, your medicine intake… But none of this comes without a cost. Such a level of connectivity will require many more base stations, which raises a growing concern that electromagnetic field radiation may be harmful to health. There is disagreement among scientists on whether 5G millimetre waves are less or more dangerous than 3 or 4G. Scientists wary of potential health risks from 5G point out that nobody knows as very little research has been done. Nobody has been asked whether we want to go down this path and we are heading into this future without consultation and with very little public debate.


    Cell Phone RADIATION & 5G DANGERS | An In-Depth Exploration
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2019
    The Strategist and Vasudev like this.
  3. Vasudev

    Vasudev Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    6,561
    Messages:
    10,089
    Likes Received:
    7,391
    Trophy Points:
    931
    I can't tolerate high SAR values. My hands go numb, my head and body hurts sometimes, so I usually keep a longer distance between cell towers.
     
    The Strategist and hmscott like this.
  4. hmscott

    hmscott Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    6,200
    Messages:
    19,423
    Likes Received:
    24,181
    Trophy Points:
    931
    With 5g you won't be but a few dozen feet between some "cells", likely closer very often.
    There are a lot more RF meters around than just a few years ago, it might be a good idea to get a competent one and measure current levels of RF at various bands / frequencies, find the strong emitters - before 5g roll out - and then continue to measure regularly for new sources - track them down and see if they are publicly announced or hidden from the public eye - only an RF meter / measuring device would be able to see their newly added RF pollution.

    Phones themselves are something else, IDK how the 5g will affect output from the cell phone, but according to what I've read it can vary greatly - some of the new 5g backs look pretty powerful, and that could end up output more RF than we are experiencing with 4g and before.

    The FCC page on SAR + pdf don't have anything useful in the way of measurements, but it has some useful comments - which might misdirect concerns away from a device when the concerns are valid in many uses:

    Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) For Cell Phones: What It Means For You
    https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/specific-absorption-rate-sar-cell-phones-what-it-means-you
    http://transition.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/sar.pdf

    "Many people mistakenly assume that using a cell phone with a lower reported SAR value necessarily decreases a user’s exposure to RF emissions, or is somehow “safer” than using a cell phone with a high SAR value. While SAR values are an important tool in judging the maximum possible exposure to RF energy from a particular model of cell phone, a single SAR value does not provide sufficient information about the amount of RF exposure under typical usage conditions to reliably compare individual cell phone models. Rather, the SAR values collected by the FCC are intended only to ensure that the cell phone does not exceed the FCC’s maximum permissible exposure levels even when operating in conditions which result in the device’s highest possible - but not its typical - RF energy absorption for a user."

    A cell phone induced to engage highest power output isn't "unusual", I'm sure my phone and most others hit that maximum during daily use many times. Moving from dense to less dense coverage requires higher power, and most of the time I am not "close" to a cell tower.

    Watch that CBN report on Cell Phone measurements, it's clear that most of us - not me - hold their phones too close to our body during use and for many carried too close to the body for far too many hours of exposure.
    Ask doctors who've treated patients with such cancer's:

    Florida Attorney Dies From 3 Different Cell Phone Induced Cancers
    https://www.rfsafe.com/florida-atto...-induced-cancers-brain-cancer-hand-and-chest/

    Each Cancer exactly where his Cell Phone was held cose to his body.

    Since Jimmy’s warning about cell phones causing GBM (Glioblastoma) brain tumors, there is a rapidly growing list of political brain tumor deaths potentially linked to wireless radiation exposure that now includes the very honored Senator John McCain who has succumbed to his GBM (Glioblastoma) diagnosis.

    Here is his video testimony - short and long versions below:

    Beau Biden Dies From Same Cell Phone Brain Tumor as Jimmy Gonzalez
    (Short version)

    RFSAFE
    Published on Jun 7, 2015
    "The Brain Tumor That Killed the Vice President’s Son Has Been Linked to Cell Phone Radiation" publichealthwatchdog.com

    Cell phone radiation is most likely the source for America’s surge in Brain cancer among politicians who have died at alarming rates since the explosion of wireless communications. Including Ted Kennedy, among 23 other politicians that have died from brain cancer since 1995 http://www.rfsafe.com/was-cell-phone-...

    The son of Vice President Joe Biden had a glioblastoma multiforme, or GBM. This all-too-common tumor has been linked to cell phone use. Jimmy Gonzalez, was also an Attorney like Beau Biden, and they both died of the same cell phone induced brain cancer.
    However, campaign contributions weren't a factor in Jimmy Gonzalez's life - it was the TRUTH that mattered to him!!

    He had the courage to stand up for what was right for the American people -- and everyone else around the world!

    Hear his full testimony that has forever changed the world's perception on the safety of wireless technology!

    http://www.rfsafe.com/florida-attorne...

    Swedish doctors found that people who use cell phones for more than a year had a 70 percent greater risk of brain cancer than those who used the wireless devices for less than a year. The study, published in the International Journal of Oncology, found that people who used mobile phones for more than 25 years had a 300 percent greater risk of developing the dreaded disease than those who used mobile phones for one year or less. The study’s authors concluded that “glioma and also acoustic neuroma are caused by RF-EMF emissions from wireless phones.”

    FACT: The World Health Organization (WHO) has upgraded cell phone radiation to B2 category, meaning “possibly carcinogenic.”


    Longer Version with a more detailed statement...

    Jimmy Gonzalez "Cell Phones Cause Cancer"
    Environmental Health Trust
    Published on Dec 13, 2014
    Jimmy Gonzalez's testimony to the Pembroke Pines Commission resulted in the passing of a Resolution to raise awareness on the health risks of cell phone radiation. Learn more about the state of science on cell phone radiation at http://ehtrust.org/ Several cities and countries are taking action to raise awareness about how people can protect themselves. Please see the full list at http://ehtrust.org/international-poli... Jimmy Gonzalez' words will save lives.

    A tragic end to his battle with cellphone induced cancers...

    Attorney Jimmy Gonzalez Dies From 3 Different Cell Phone Radiation Induced Cancers
    RFSAFE
    Published on Feb 14, 2015
    Sadly, I just heard the news, Florida Attorney Jimmy Gonzalez succumbed to several DIFFERENT cancers ALL caused by cell phone radiation exposure!
    EACH CANCER EXACTLY WHERE HIS CELL PHONE WAS HELD CLOSE TO HIS BODY!

    Jimmy vs Cell Phone Induced Cancer – A battle Jimmy fought to the end, and it is a battle RF Safe will continue in his dedication along with all the other lives which have been destroyed by a tradition of wireless profits before people.

    Our prayers go out to Jimmy Gonzalez’s wife, children and family! I’ve felt their pain and frustration over the issue of RF Radiation exposure. I attribute the death of my daughter Angel Leigh Coates to RF Radiation exposure as well. Just as Jimmy did, RF Safe will continue this battle through to our last breaths too! God Bless You Jimmy!

    “CELL PHONES DO CAUSE CANCER” – Jimmy Gonzalez (Obituary) February 20, 1972 – November 27, 2014

    A Tragedy of EMFs

    Angel Leigh Coates
    1995 - 1995
    http://www.rfsafe.com
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2019
    The Strategist and Vasudev like this.
  5. hmscott

    hmscott Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    6,200
    Messages:
    19,423
    Likes Received:
    24,181
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Intel kills 5G deal with China’s Unigroup over U.S. security concerns
    JEREMY HORWITZ@HORWITZ FEBRUARY 26, 2019 8:14 AM
    https://venturebeat.com/2019/02/26/...h-chinas-unigroup-over-u-s-security-concerns/

    "Intel has halted a long-term plan to share 5G modem technology with a Chinese government-backed chipmaker, due in part to concerns over recent U.S. tensions with China, Nikkei reports. The deal was previously expected to expand Intel’s opportunities in China’s growing market, while aiding the Chinese government’s plans to develop its own chip industry.

    Following a 2014 investment, under which Intel took a 20 percent stake in state-owned Tsinghua Unigroup, the companies last February announced a 5G tie-up as a “powerful combination targeting 5G smartphones.” Their “long-term strategic collaboration” was meant to create a 5G Android smartphone platform for sale in China in the second half of 2019, combining Intel’s 5G modem with a Unigroup chipset.

    Now the Unigroup deal is off, a recent decision that Intel confirmed and characterized as mutual, while saying that it was not based on political pressure from the U.S. government. Even so, Nikkei reports that Intel wanted not to “somehow upset U.S. authorities given the current tensions” with China, and backed off the deal after the unexpected departure of its key advocate, former CEO Brian Krzanich.

    The Trump Administration has spent the past year fighting a trade war with China’s government, while simultaneously accusing Chinese cellular companiesHuawei and ZTE of facilitating espionage and committing sanctions violations. Though Huawei has repeatedly denied any espionage-related activities, it has faced mounting accusations from the government and private companies, while ZTE made a deal with the administration to resolve sanctions-related claims. Concerns still persist, however, and the U.S. government is threatening to ban the Chinese companies’ equipment from being used in cellular networks.

    Intel’s 5G modem plans have also changed considerably over the last year. The company decided to skip its first-generation modem in favor of a more power-efficient sequel, delaying the arrival of consumer 5G products from 2019 to 2020. At this year’s CES and Mobile World Congress shows, the chipmaker focused largely on announcing new 5G server and base station components, letting rivals such as Qualcomm, Samsung, and Huawei premiere early consumer 5G devices.

    Following the breakup of its Intel deal, Unigroup now says that it’s working on its own 5G modem without Intel’s assistance. Similarly, Huawei has already developed its own 5G modem and smartphones for sale to consumers in China, while other Chinese smartphone makers are expected to rely substantially on 5G modems from Qualcomm and MediaTek."
     
    The Strategist and Vasudev like this.
  6. The Strategist

    The Strategist Living with Hope

    Reputations:
    2,704
    Messages:
    1,822
    Likes Received:
    3,883
    Trophy Points:
    281
    hmscott and Vasudev like this.
  7. hmscott

    hmscott Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    6,200
    Messages:
    19,423
    Likes Received:
    24,181
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Vasudev and The Strategist like this.
  8. hmscott

    hmscott Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    6,200
    Messages:
    19,423
    Likes Received:
    24,181
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Huawei CEO Is a Lying Liar | China Uncensored
    China Uncensored
    Premiered 18 hours ago
    This week's China News Headlines! #Huawei's CEO Ren Zhengfei says Huawei would never share information with the Chinese government or create a backdoor for the CCP. He's a lying liar! But Huawei is also suing the US government. So much for US China relations. A new microwave weapon that causes extreme pain—was it used on US consulate workers in Havana, Cuba and China? China plans to send a probe to Mars. Social Credit system denies millions travel. And the UN wants to go to Xinjiang!
     
    Vasudev and The Strategist like this.
  9. The Strategist

    The Strategist Living with Hope

    Reputations:
    2,704
    Messages:
    1,822
    Likes Received:
    3,883
    Trophy Points:
    281
    All technology owners are doing the same with their governments without any exceptions.
     
    Vasudev and hmscott like this.
  10. hmscott

    hmscott Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    6,200
    Messages:
    19,423
    Likes Received:
    24,181
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Why did the Huawei CEO bald-faced lie about it then?

    If we can't trust them to speak the truth about what is clearly true - that Huawei and other Chinese communications companies are required to turn over any and all data to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as you correctly pointed out, then why do business with them?

    What is clear is that there are many good reasons for barring Huawei and other Chinese companies - who are all under the direct control of the CCP - from gaining "intimate" access to the data pipelines tasked with interconnecting communications in any country.
     
    Last edited: Mar 9, 2019
    Vasudev and The Strategist like this.
Loading...

Share This Page