All about 5G Technologies

Discussion in 'Smartphones and Tablets' started by Dr. AMK, Apr 17, 2017.

  1. Dr. AMK

    Dr. AMK The Strategist

    Reputations:
    1,724
    Messages:
    1,273
    Likes Received:
    2,703
    Trophy Points:
    181
    I think 5G is more than just fixing all previous generations problems, but it will be better coverage, 10 times faster and more stable,,, and other things.
    5g Wireless Technology has the potential to weaponize almost everything and we all need to deeply understand this technology. I created this thread "All about 5G Technologies" not only to collect some news about it, but to rise a flag that we must know more and we must be aware of the potential that this technology has and be sure of what risks we as humanity are willing to take for the sake of Money and Convenience.
    5G will lead to a revolution in communications industry and it will change our way of life in the future.
    Economically, it needs $300B only to cover the US, so you can imagine how much it will need to cover the rest of the world,
     
    Last edited: Mar 18, 2018
    hmscott likes this.
  2. Dr. AMK

    Dr. AMK The Strategist

    Reputations:
    1,724
    Messages:
    1,273
    Likes Received:
    2,703
    Trophy Points:
    181
    What Is 5G? & How 5G Will Change The World!
     
    hmscott likes this.
  3. Dr. AMK

    Dr. AMK The Strategist

    Reputations:
    1,724
    Messages:
    1,273
    Likes Received:
    2,703
    Trophy Points:
    181
    BREAKING: DARPA Admits 5G Designed To Slowly Kill Population
     
    hmscott likes this.
  4. Danishblunt

    Danishblunt Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    549
    Messages:
    3,664
    Likes Received:
    1,481
    Trophy Points:
    231
    So better throw out all the microwaves because everyone can see it causes cancer!!!!!!!! (I'm being sarcastic btw)

    I'm not the least bit suprised that this is coming from america :'D
     
  5. Dr. AMK

    Dr. AMK The Strategist

    Reputations:
    1,724
    Messages:
    1,273
    Likes Received:
    2,703
    Trophy Points:
    181
    How 5G could prevent Stingray-style surveillance and keep business travelers safer
    DHS official Christopher Krebs confirmed that the US government is aware of hackers using surveillance devices in Washington, DC since 2014.

    Unknown individuals or groups are illegally operating IMSI catchers in Washington, DC, according to Department of Homeland Security official Christopher Krebs.
    Mitigations for the vulnerability which these devices rely on are included in the 5G mobile network specification.
    Unknown individuals or groups are operating IMSI catchers—otherwise popularly known as Stingrays, after the popular model sold by defense contractor Harris Corporation—in the Washington, DC metro area. This revelation came about following the publication last week of a letter by Department of Homeland Security (DHS) official Christopher Krebs, in which he indicated that his organization "has observed anomalous activity in the National Capital Region (NCR) that appears to be consistent with International Mobile Subscriber Identity (IMSI) catchers."
    Krebs' letter was a response to Senator Ron Wyden, who inquired last November about whether or not evidence exists indicating that foreign intelligence services were using the technology within the United States. Wyden's inquiry (correctly) characterized IMSI catchers as devices that "impersonate cell phone towers to locate and identify nearby phones and to intercept calls and text messages covertly."
    Further, a task force was established by the FCC in 2014 following reports by security researchers that IMSI catchers were being used around DC, as reported by the Washington Post at the time, though no further statements about the issue have been made since that time.
    SEE: Cybersecurity strategy research: Common tactics, issues with implementation, and effectiveness (Tech Pro Research)
    Now, House Representatives Eliot Engel, Frank Pallone, and Bennie Thompson, the ranking members of the Foreign Affairs, Energy & Commerce, and Homeland Security committees respectively, are demanding answers of the FCC.
    In a letter to FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, the trio noted that "With no apparent evidence that these recently revealed unauthorized cell-site simulators are operating with an FCC license, it would seem the FCC need only to enforce the law to stop this foreign intelligence gathering."
    The use of IMSI catchers by law enforcement is itself a matter of concern. While the technology has been available to the FBI since the mid-1990s, only in 2015 did the Justice Department issue guidelines requiring federal agents to obtain a warrant before using the devices.
    In principle, the technology works due to an oversight in the design of GSM standards, which require a device to authenticate to the network, but do not require networks to authenticate to devices. This allows IMSI catchers to impersonate base stations, and capture the IMSI IDs of devices within range of the catcher. Such devices are also capable of forcing phones to use no encryption during calls, or using easily breakable encryption, allowing the IMSI catcher operator to listen in.

    It should be noted that 3G and 4G standards have introduced mitigations to this flaw, requiring mutual authentication, though advanced attacks are capable of forcing phones to communicate with the IMSI catcher in 2G mode, overriding these mitigations.
    Further mitigations for this vulnerability are included in new 5G mobile network standards. The 5G standard will include both a Subscription Permanent Identifier (SUPI) and Subscription Concealed Identifier (SUCI). According to reporting by ZDNet's David Meyer, the SUPI is "encrypted using the network operator's public key," which will allow phones to ensure that the network they are connecting to is genuine. This could put business travelers at ease in areas like DC, as they could be more confident that their sensitive conversations weren't being snooped on.
     
    hmscott likes this.
  6. Dr. AMK

    Dr. AMK The Strategist

    Reputations:
    1,724
    Messages:
    1,273
    Likes Received:
    2,703
    Trophy Points:
    181
  7. Dr. AMK

    Dr. AMK The Strategist

    Reputations:
    1,724
    Messages:
    1,273
    Likes Received:
    2,703
    Trophy Points:
    181
    What 5G *Really* Means
     
  8. hmscott

    hmscott Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    4,882
    Messages:
    17,073
    Likes Received:
    20,977
    Trophy Points:
    931
    As anything that comes out of this guys mouth, and related outlets, can seem silly, RF is serious stuff and much of the exposure testing isn't realistically set up - and the methodology hasn't changed in many years.

    The research he flashed up on the screen, recently deleted from the government site, is indeed disturbing in it's results - as it more realistically tests exposure distance.

    Not April Fools Day Joke “Clear Evidence of Cancer” from Cell Phone Radiation
    https://www.rfsafe.com/not-april-fools-day-joke-clear-evidence-of-cancer-from-cell-phone-radiation/

    The government site pulled the PDF, 404 Not Found...:

    "The National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences released a statement on the conclusions of the panel for each endpoint found" here, now gone...:
    https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/about_ntp/trpanel/2018/march/actions_508.pdf

    **** Found and attached to this post for your convenience ****

    Can your cellphone cause cancer? Scientists find definitive link in study of rats.
    BY JOHN MURAWSKI
    jmurawski@newsobserver.com, March 28, 2018 05:10 PM

    "RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK - Cellphone radio-frequency waves can be decisively linked to cancer in rats, according to a national science panel meeting in Research Triangle Park on Wednesday. The scientists' finding establishes the clearest connection of cellphone risk to humans in a major U.S. study to date.
    The scientists made their announcement at the end of a three-day meeting to review a $25 million rodent experiment conducted by the National Toxicology Program in RTP for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The draft of the study, issued in early February, had established a weak link in some cases and no link in others, but the scientific advisory panel on Wednesday said the data is more compelling and indicates greater risk than initially acknowledged.

    Wednesday's decision is expected to change the debate over cellphone safety as the telecommunications industry, with encouragement from the Federal Communications Commission, prepares to roll out the next-generation high-speed 5G wireless technology. Public health activists predict the science panel's conclusions of wireless risks will increase pressure on federal agencies to issue safety warnings and tighten safety standards of the ubiquitous electronic device.

    "It should most likely lead to a reduction in exposure limits," said Ronald Melnick, the National Toxicology Program scientist who designed the study before he retired nine years ago. "This matters a lot because the agencies that will receive this data will make public health decisions based on this information."

    Melnick said the health risks acknowledged Wednesday could compel public officials and telecom leaders "not to promote the use of some of these radio-frequency emitting devices for kids."

    Just last month the draft report had been deemed inconclusive by the FDA and by the American Cancer Society, and the scientific panel was expected by the activists to rubber-stamp those conclusions in Wednesday's meeting.

    Before the scientists voted, Kevin Mottus, the outreach director of the California Brain Tumor Association, demanded from the floor that the entire panel recuse itself for lacking qualifications to assess radio-frequency data. Mottus later said that cellphones are comparable to asbestos and tobacco and should carry health warning labels.

    But as the voting discussion got underway, the scientists began proposing motions to upgrade the level of the findings to state that prolonged radio-frequency exposure can be clearly linked to heart tissue cancer in male rats. The draft study had previously said there was some link but no clear evidence.

    The heart tissue cancers were particularly significant because they are a rare form of cancer that rarely occurs in rats and could not be explained as random illnesses.

    National Toxicology Program senior scientist John Bucher said the heart tissue cancer that developed in male rats is the same type of cancer that has been seen in some people who have used cellphones at the highest power settings for years.

    "The fact that this tumor type was the same really drew our eye to it," Bucher said. "And also they were some of the strongest findings from a numerical standpoint."

    The panelists also voted that the study shows some link between cellphone radiation and brain cancer in rats. The draft had said that link was equivocal, a scientific designation indicating it was inconclusive and arguably inconsequential.
    In addition to showing an increase in cancers in rats, the study also showed that newborn rats weighed less and suffered higher death rates when living in a radio-frequency radiation chamber.

    What's next?

    The FDA's director of the office of science and engineering, Edward Margerrison, attended the meeting and warned afterwards against forming rash conclusions based on Wednesday's votes. "We're taking a responsible approach," he said. "We're not gonna knee-jerk on anything."

    Apparently their responsible approach amounted to deleting the findings from the Research site. :D

    And, 5G is going to provide different exposure that hasn't been studied even as much as previous RF exposure.
    https://www.google.com/search?q=dangerous+5g+rf+levels+dangerous

    The Berkeley Cell Phone “Right To Know” Ordinance (2018)
    http://forum.notebookreview.com/threads/the-berkeley-cell-phone-“right-to-know”-ordinance-2018.820635/

    New Research Finds If Smartphones Were Radiation Tested How They’re Used, They’d Be Illegal!

    https://www.rfsafe.com/new-research-finds-smartphones-radiation-tested-theyre-used-theyd-illegal/
    • 9 out of 10 Cell Phones Tested Exceed Government SAR Radiation Limits.
    • Manufacturers don’t test phones directly against the body, like in pants, shirt pocket or in contact with skin.
    • It took a lawsuit in order for the National Frequency Agency of France to release this research from 2015.
    • Cell phone companies are waging a battle similar to those of tobacco companies by war gaming research.
    • Cell phone companies require a minimum separation distance of between 5 and 15 mm for regulatory approval.
    On June 1st 2017, by court order, The National Frequency Agency of France released research completed in 2015 showing 9 out of 10 cell phones exceed government radiation limits when researchers tested the way people actually use them—directly next to the body.

    The body absorbs higher levels of microwave radiation from a phone when it’s in a pocket, or tucked in a bra. There are a few reasons why..."

    Don't carry your phone on your person, use speaker phone, find headphones that block RF:

    https://www.google.com/search?q=rf+safe+blocking+headphones

    RF Safe Air Tube Headsets
    https://www.rfsafe.com/product-category/phone-radiation-safety/rf-safe-air-tube-headsets/

    Is Bluetooth Radiation as Dangerous as Cell Phone Radiation?
    https://www.rfsafe.com/bluetooth-radiation-dangerous-cell-phone-radiation/
    "People need to realize that Bluetooth devices that fit in or around the ear typically radiate at 0.23 watts per kilogram (W/Kg). Some Bluetooth devices are actually worse than some of the lowest SAR cell phones...."

    First time ever, a Smartphone is recalled because of excessive levels of hazardous RF radiation
    https://www.rfsafe.com/first-time-e...f-excessive-levels-of-hazardous-rf-radiation/

    "Last month, Orange sent a letter to about 90,000 of its customers that purchased the flip phone to warn them of the defect. In certain conditions, the low-end phone, made in Mobiwire’s factory located in Ningbo, China, would emit 2.1 watts of radiation per kilogram of body weight (or W/kg), which is over Europe’s safety limit standard set at 2 W/kg."

    National Toxicology Program: Peer & public review of cell phone radiation study reports
    Thursday, May 3, 2018
    https://www.saferemr.com/2018/01/national-toxicology-program-peer-public.html

    Actions from Peer Review of the Draft NTP Technical Reports on Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation March 26-28, 2018
    https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uplo...adiofrequency-Radiation-March-26-28-2018-.pdf
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Jul 3, 2018
    Dr. AMK likes this.
  9. hmscott

    hmscott Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    4,882
    Messages:
    17,073
    Likes Received:
    20,977
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Plan To Install 50,000 Cell Towers In California Faces Opposition
    By Phil Matier, June 28, 2017 at 7:48 pm
    https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2017/06/28/plan-install-50000-cell-towers-california-opposition/

    "WALNUT CREEK (KPIX 5) – Up to 50,000 cell phone towers coming to cities across California.

    But will you get a say on where they pop up?

    California cities are now fighting back at a proposed law that is moving quickly through the legislature.

    They say it would allow phone companies to put up new antennas in your neighborhood, like it or not.

    State Sen. Ben Hueso (D-San Diego) says, “5G wireless has the potential to be a game changer.”

    But to pave the way for that game change, telecom companies need to put up between 30,000 and 50,000 of cell antennas — including in your town — over the next five years with only limited local say.

    San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo said, “Neighborhoods would be seeing something the size of refrigerators going up on street poles and could say nothing to stop it.”

    Solano County Supervisor Erin Hannigan said, “Could be on a library, could be on a school.”

    “On traffic signals, light polls,” Liccardo said. “This would give the companies the right to install on any public infrastructure and we would have zero ability to say ‘no.'”

    On the other hand, the new network could also mean much faster Internet service to keep California on the innovation forefront.

    The use of smart devices and mobile Internet has increased 2,300 percent statewide since 2010.

    Steve Carlson with CTIA-Wireless Association said, “California was the epicenter of the last Internet revolution and can and should be the epicenter of the next one.”

    Huesso said, “Business investment and job creation will follow.”

    As for local say?

    Huesso said, it “preserves local government right for reasonable concerns.”

    There is also the issue of money.

    The new rules would cap how much local jurisdictions could charge telecom companies at $250 per antenna, a far cry from the $1,250 that cities like San Jose now get.

    Liccardo said, “You are talking about an industry that will net $500 billion after full build out.”

    Telecom contributed $2.4 million to California’s Democratic and Republican parties in the 2016 election."

    Plan To Install Cell Towers In California Cities Without Community Input Face Opposition
    KPIX CBS SF Bay Area
    Published on Jun 28, 2017
    Opposition mounts against a plan to installation hundreds of cell towers in cities across California with no local input on where they go. Phil Matier reports. (6/28/16)


    ConsumerWatch: 5G Cellphone Towers Signal Renewed Concerns Over Impacts on Health
    KPIX CBS SF Bay Area
    Published on Jan 25, 2018
    Wireless carriers are installing millions of towers across the country to enable the new, faster 5G cellphone technology. KPIX asks the question: Are there legitimate health concerns? Julie Watts reports. (1-25-18)
     
    Last edited: Jul 3, 2018
    Dr. AMK likes this.
  10. hmscott

    hmscott Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    4,882
    Messages:
    17,073
    Likes Received:
    20,977
    Trophy Points:
    931
    This is a very interesting field study of a 4G installation in Palo Alto California, right in the heart of Silicon Valley, a short walk to Stanford University. Very high RF readings were found, dangerous placement of emitting hardware close to human habitation. The same would be done for 5g except at much higher frequency, higher power (high loss at higher frequencies), and denser deployment. Following this is a recent declaration to do the same to San Jose city.

    SCIENTISTS FOR WIRED TECHNOLOGY
    Advocacy based on Scientists' research of the hazards of pulsed, data-modulated, Radiofrequency Microwave Radiation
    http://scientists4wiredtech.com/
    [​IMG]

    This My Street, My Choice!
    http://mystreetmychoice.com/

    This My Street, My Choice! web site contains information and links to help residents fight the unconstitutional onslaught of 4G / 5G Close Proximity Microwave Radiation Antennas (CPMRA) being proposed in residential zones, which is already a proven health, safety and liability hazard.

    Here is What You Can Do:
    Despite hundreds of millions of dollars spent by the Wireless industry to lobby our State and Federal legislators and game the system, the 99% far outnumbers the 1% and we can wield game-changing power — if we band together, defend our inalienable rights and demand changes.
    • Visit your city-specific page, listed in the menu above.
    • Read the pages and watch the videos on this web site.
    • Learn more at other expert web sites here, here and here.
    • Write your City Council members and City Manager to demand that they stop these Wireless-only projects and engage in a public process — as required by Federal, State and Municipal code.
    • Pack any public meetings in Apr/May 2018 — to speak or support others who will speak. There is real strength in numbers.
    Palo Alto 4G Small Cells: An Extreme Health Hazard
    19 “Small Cell” 4G Antennas with Faux-Mailbox Power Supplies in Palo Alto, CA
    APRIL 23, 2017 BY PMG
    http://scientists4wiredtech.com/2017/04/palo-alto-4g-small-cells/

    The following is a link to the planning documents for a high-density 4G Distributed Antenna System (DAS) in Palo Alto: 19 so-called “small Cell” antennas installed in high-density fashion in a 3 block x 6 block area. These antennas and their faux-maibox power supply cabinets were deployed on Palo Alto sidewalks by Crown Castle on behalf of Verizon. Construction was completed and the antennas were powered-on in November, 2016.

    On 4/21/17, we completed measurements of Radio-Frequency Microwave Radiation (RF/MW radiation) on the sidewalks beneath and near these DAS antennas using a professionally-certified RF/MW radiation meter. The results show that these antennas are forcibly exposing Palo Alto residents, workers and visitors to hazardous levels of RF/MW radiation 24/7/365. Our RF/MW radiation measurements, unbelievably, are the only actual RF/MW radiation measurements ever completed for this project.[​IMG]
    The red dots on this map represent locations of 19 so-called “small cell” antennas that are forcibly exposing Palo Alto residents, workers and visitors to extremely hazardous levels of Radio-Frequency Microwave Radiation (RF/MW radiation) 24/7/365
    [​IMG]
    The screen of the HF-59B meter (equipped with a DG20_G10 -20 dB attenuator) shows peak RF/MW radiation readings of 72,000 to 123,000 microwatts per square meter (µW/m²) when standing on the sidewalk below the “Small Cells”. Applying the correction factor for the high-speed, pulsed, digital signals of 4G/LTE, the peak levels of 4G/LTE RF/MW radiation are actually over 720,000 to 1,230,000 µW/m², per the GigaHertz Solutions’ product manual and product video.

    Credit: All RF/MW radiation and EMF precision instruments and metering services provided by Eric Windheim, Certified BBEC, EMRS, and owner of Windheim EMF Solutions. The Gigahertz Solutions HF-59B documentation specifies how to properly meter and report the high crest factor signals with needle-like, microsecond bursts of power used in the 4G/LTE signals (with OFDM/OFDMA modulation) that are emitted by these “Small Cell” antennas in downtown Palo Alto.

    DOSE or total exposure over time, is the relevant concept to any physician evaluating exposure to a toxic agent or to any toxicology study, including the $25-million, 16-year 2016 National Toxicology Program Study on Carcinognenesis of RF/MW radiation. Dr. Ronald L. Melnick, the lead designer of the NTP study stated on 6/1/16:

    Risk is determined from both the dosimetry, which is the absorbed power [multiplied by] time [of exposure], versus the tumor response . . . because of the large number of [exposed human] users worldwide, even a small increase in risk at exposure propensities that may be close to what humans experience, could result in a large number of people developing a RF-radiation-induced tumor with long-term exposure.

    When they wrote the 1996 Telecommunications Act, the Wireless industry lobbyists conveniently left out of the FCC RF/MW radiation exposure guidelines any concept of total exposure over time. These lobbyists and FCC regulators wrote into law fraudulent, scientifically-unsound, RF/MW exposure guidelines based on a rate of exposure, not based on the total exposure over time: this obvious trick is considered utter nonsense by competent physicians or PhD biologists, working in the field.

    The Wireless industry lobbyists based their RF/MW radiation exposure guideline on a false and scientifically-unsound assumption that living organisms can dissipate the biological effects of RF/MW radiation exposures. Substantial scientific evidence (over 25,000 studies since the 1920’s) have proven immediate and direct short-term biological damages from RF/MW radiation exposures at levels far below what we measured on Palo Alto sidewalks on 4/21/17. There are also long-term biological damages caused by these levels of RF/MW radiation.
    DOSE is explained by these excellent Dr. Karl Maret videos: and . DOSE is also shown and explained here.

    Here are the relevant biologically-based RF Microwave Exposure guidelines:

    No Hazard Slight Hazard Severe Hazard Extreme Hazard
    less than 0.1 µW/m² 0.1 µW/m² to 10 µW/m² 10 µW/m² to 1000 µW/m² greater than 1000 µW/m²
    Measuring peak, not average, levels of RF/MW radiation is critical to fully understand the hazards created by the RF/MW radiation levels that are now present on the downtown Palo Alto sidewalks. RF/MW radiation of 720,000 µW/m² to 1,230,000 µW/m² is EXTREMELY HAZARDOUS.

    Note: µW/m² means microwatt (or 1/1,00,000th of a Watt) per square meter:
    • Peak RF/MW radiation levels higher than 10 µW/m² is a severe hazard.
    • Peak RF/MW radiation levels higher than 1,000 µW/m² is an extreme hazard.
    Downtown Palo Alto: a Tony Mix of Retail and Residential Units Near Stanford University[​IMG]
    Iconic Apple Store in Downtown Palo Alto, CA (340 University Ave.)[​IMG]
    One green faux-mailbox per Verizon Small Cell antenna, installed and operated by Crown Castle, contains electrical supply equipment that powers the pole-mounted antennas.[​IMG]
    A cell phone tower 15 feet from 2nd-story bedroom windows is not desirable.
    Site P09m2: Bryant/Hamilton Streets, across from City Hall[​IMG]
    Photo taken from City Hall, across Bryant St.; the faux-mailbox power supply blocks the sidewalk, while the antenna array pollutes the homes and businesses along Bryant St..[​IMG]
    The screen of the HF-59B meter shows a peak RF/MW radiation reading of 38,000 µW/m², while standing across the street, about 75 feet away from the “Small Cell”. Applying the correction factor for high-speed pulsed digital signals (explained here), the peak levels of 4G/LTE RF/MW radiation are actually over 380,000 µW/m². This is an extreme health hazard.
    [​IMG]
    Metering so-called “Small Cell” antenna mounted 20 feet high on light pole; faux-mailbox power supply exposes people to strong magnetic fields.[​IMG]
    17.5 cubic foot faux-mailbox contains equipment that burns electricity 24/37/365 to spray RF/MW radiation into the homes/businesses on Bryant[​IMG]
    The faux-mailbox also exposes people to magnetic fields of 5 milligauss or higher; because the “mailbox” lacks warning signs, anyone could lean up against this cabinet in the public right of way.
    [​IMG]
    The screen of the HF-59B meter shows a peak RF/MW radiation reading of 72,000 µW/m², while standing on the sidewalk beneath the “Small Cell”. Applying the correction factor for high-speed pulsed digital signals (explained here), the peak levels of 4G/LTE RF/MW radiation are actually over 720,000 µW/m².This is an extreme health hazard.[​IMG]
    View of the powerful “Small Cell” antenna from where we metered.
    Site P13m: Lytton Avenue/Emerson St. at The Bus Stop[​IMG]
    Many of these Small Cells/power supplies were installed near public benches or bus stops, creating long-term RF/MW radiation exposure of Palo Alto residents, workers or visitors.[​IMG]
    The screen of the HF-59B meter shows a peak RF/MW radiation reading of 81,000 µW/m², while standing on the sidewalk beneath the “Small Cell”. Applying the correction factor for high-speed pulsed digital signals (explained here), the peak levels of 4G/LTE RF/MW radiation are actually over 810,000 µW/m².This is an extreme health hazard.[​IMG]
    View of the powerful “Small Cell” antenna from where we metered.[​IMG]
    RF/MW radiation-emitting antennas damages trees nearby.
    Site P04m: Ramona Street/University Avenue[​IMG]
    Power supplies on narrow sidewalks, like this, impede pedestrian traffic in public right of way.
    [​IMG]
    The screen of the HF-59B meter shows a peak RF/MW radiation reading of 88,000 µW/m², while standing on the sidewalk beneath the “Small Cell”. Applying the correction factor for high-speed pulsed digital signals (explained here), the peak levels of 4G/LTE RF/MW radiation are actually over 880,000 µW/m².This is an extreme health hazard.[​IMG]
    View of the powerful “Small Cell” antenna from where we metered.
    Site P05m: Florence Street/University Avenue[​IMG]
    There are no warning signs on either the faux-mailbox power supply cabinetor the pole housing the “Small Cell” antenna about the RF/WM radiation or magnetic field hazards.
    [​IMG]
    The screen of the HF-59B meter shows a peak RF/MW radiation reading of 96,000 µW/m², while standing on the sidewalk beneath the “Small Cell”. Applying the correction factor for high-speed pulsed digital signals (explained here), the peak levels of 4G/LTE RF/MW radiation are actually over 960,000 µW/m².This is an extreme health hazard.
    [​IMG]
    In Palo Alto, care was taken to match the color of the Small Cell cover to the color of the pole.[​IMG]
    View of the powerful “Small Cell” antenna from where we metered.
    Site P19m: Hamilton/Emerson Streets at Yoga Source[​IMG]
    This “Small Cell” antenna is 12 feet from a 3rd-story balcony, which is a severe health hazard.
    [​IMG]
    The screen of the HF-59B meter shows a peak RF/MW radiation reading of 100,000 µW/m², while standing on the sidewalk beneath the “Small Cell”. Applying the correction factor for high-speed pulsed digital signals (explained here), the peak levels of 4G/LTE RF/MW radiation are actually over 1,000,000 µW/m². This is an extreme health hazard.
    [​IMG]
    This is the only “Small Cell” pole in downtown Palo Alto with its power supply mounted on the pole, instead of placed on the sidewalk.
    Site P15m: Lytton Ave./Bryant Street, Across from Cogswell Plaza[​IMG]
    This “Small Cell” antenna is 12 feet from a 2nd-story balcony, which is a severe health hazard.
    [​IMG]
    The “Small Cell” antenna is directed at Cogswell Plaza, across the street, a public park with tables/benches and a grassy area for kids to play.
    [​IMG]
    The screen of the HF-59B meter shows a peak RF/MW radiation reading of 18,190 µW/m², while standing on the sidewalk across the street about 100 feet from the “Small Cell”. Applying the correction factor for high-speed pulsed digital signals (explained here), the peak levels of 4G/LTE RF/MW radiation are actually over 181,900 µW/m². This is an extreme health hazard.
    [​IMG]
    The faux-mailbox power supply, once again, crowds the public right of way.[​IMG]
    These faux-mailbox power supplies are easy targets for graffiti.[​IMG]
    The screen of the HF-59B meter shows a peak RF/MW radiation reading of 114,000 µW/m², while standing on the sidewalk beneath the “Small Cell”. Applying the correction factor for high-speed pulsed digital signals (explained here), the peak levels of 4G/LTE RF/MW radiation are actually over 1,140,000 µW/m².This is an extreme health hazard.[​IMG]
    This small cell antenna is entirely too close to this 2nd story balcony
    [​IMG]
    View of the powerful “Small Cell” antenna from where we metered.[​IMG]
    “Small Cell” antenna directed at 2nd-story and 3rd-Story windows of office building across the street.
    Site P01m: High Street/University Avenue
    [​IMG]
    “Small Cell” antenna directed at 2nd story windows nearby.[​IMG]
    Metering on sidewalk, beneath the antenna, near the faux-mailbox power supply.
    [​IMG]
    The screen of the HF-59B meter shows a peak RF/MW radiation reading of 123,000 µW/m², while standing on the sidewalk beneath the “Small Cell”. Applying the correction factor for high-speed pulsed digital signals (explained here), the peak levels of 4G/LTE RF/MW radiation are actually over 1,230,000 µW/m². This is an extreme health hazard.[​IMG]
    View of the powerful “Small Cell” antenna from where we metered. This antenna is much too close to these 2nd story windows.

    Coming soon to a city you live in...

    San Jose picks three companies to make street lights 'smart,' set groundwork for 5G
    By J. Jennings Moss – Editor-in-Chief and General Manager, Silicon Valley Business Journal
    Jun 15, 2018, 3:05pm PDT Updated Jun 15, 2018, 3:09pm PDT
    https://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose...ose-picks-three-companies-to-make-street.html

    "Mobilitie: "Mobilitie will deploy small cells throughout San Jose to bring enhanced connectivity today to all residents, visitors and businesses, including those in traditionally under-served areas, as well as establish a foundation for 5G and next-generation wireless services in the future."

    Making new RF sensitive clothing and accessories that will "light up" in the presence of RF - driven and powered by the RF - would be great new products to ship with the roll-out of 5G small cell hardware. Quite the light show on your evening walk strolling through the neighborhood. :D
     
    Last edited: Jul 3, 2018
    Dr. AMK likes this.

Share This Page