Quantcast Sony FW Ati 3650m, is it that bad?

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
  1. #1
    Notebook Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    40
    Rep Power
    11

    Default Sony FW Ati 3650m, is it that bad?

    Hey guys, I am looking at the Sony FW series of notebooks and I am liking it so far. One thing that I don't like is the Ati 3650.

    I plan on getting the 1080p screen, and I might be playing some games. Nothing to extreme. Stuff like Counter Strike Source to Left 4 Dead and Team Fortress. What settings would I need to lower in order to play these games at an acceptable FPS? (Acceptable meaning NEVER below 30) I will be playing these games at native res. Can anyone here that actually has the Notebook confirm this? Thanks.

  2. #2
    sees beauty in everything
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    5,921
    Rep Power
    41

    Default Re: Sony FW Ati 3650m, is it that bad?

    I'm pretty sure you won't be playing Left 4 Dead at native res (1920x1080) with a Radeon 3650 never dropping below 30 FPS period. Doesn't really matter how much you lower the other settings.
    1920x1080 would be so taxing on the GPU.

  3. #3
    His Imperial Majesty
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Kilrath
    Posts
    1,238
    Rep Power
    15

    Default Re: Sony FW Ati 3650m, is it that bad?

    Quote Originally Posted by ajdude101 View Post
    Hey guys, I am looking at the Sony FW series of notebooks and I am liking it so far. One thing that I don't like is the Ati 3650.

    I plan on getting the 1080p screen, and I might be playing some games. Nothing to extreme. Stuff like Counter Strike Source to Left 4 Dead and Team Fortress. What settings would I need to lower in order to play these games at an acceptable FPS? (Acceptable meaning NEVER below 30) I will be playing these games at native res. Can anyone here that actually has the Notebook confirm this? Thanks.
    I play AOEIII, Company of Heroes (DX9 settings), Titan's Quest Immortal Throne, CIV IV, Sins of a Solar Empire and Red Alert 3 at 1920x1200 (external LCD) at med-high (some settings on med, a few on high). It works fine and very playable. Of course none of these (except Company of Heroes) really taxes the GPU.

    I looked at the announced but as yet unavailable MSI GT725 before buying the FW. At $1350 and 7lbs without Bluray or $1600 w/Bluray its a bit heavier and a bit more expensive and only has a 1680*1050 17" display.

    I decided I couldn't wait and wanted the Bluray (we have over 50 Bluray movies) and my FW 2.26 was only $999 two weeks b4 Christmas.

    The ATI HD4850 is definitely faster (and more importantly, not nVidia). If you want it now, fullHD and Bluray, the Sony FW is a good compromise.

    Cheers,
    Trust, but locate the doors,
    For SALE - M17xR3 i7-2720|16GB|256GB SSD|750GB WD BLK|AMD 6990
    Lenovo Y510 SLI Nvidia 750m, 12GB, 500GB SSD + 24GB SSD
    iPad Verizon LTE 64GB
    flickr *** Panzer06 Marketplace Feedback Here***
    Alienware M17xR3 For Sale

  4. #4
    Notebook Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    40
    Rep Power
    11

    Default Re: Sony FW Ati 3650m, is it that bad?

    To be honest, the only reason I started looking at Sony Vaio's is:

    Screen quality: Sony never lets me down on their screens. Awesome color and contrast.

    Build quality: Doesn't feel like cheap plastic, very solid.

    Keyboard: After seeing and feeling the Vaio's "Chicklet" keyboard, I can not go back.

    Those are the three reasons I like these Vaios. I was looking at the Gateway FX p7805u, but after seeing it at Best Buy, it is just crap compared to Sony. It felt so heavy and bulky, didn't have the build quality that Sony has, and the screen looked worse than my crappy Magnavox CRT.

    After seeing the Vaio, I can't look back at another laptop. But I sure want to play some light games on it, maybe L4D or COD4 being the most gpu intensive. Not going to do some extreme gaming, but you know, something to play on the go. I really wish that Sony would let us choose something like a 3850 or 3870, I would be so happy. I can't stand playing at a non-native resolution. Thank you panzer for your response

  5. #5
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    345
    Rep Power
    14

    Default Re: Sony FW Ati 3650m, is it that bad?

    Specs wise, the Gateway is unbeatable. Otherwise I'd still choose the FW any day.
    Current Computer
    Sony Vaio FW290JAB 16.4" 1920x1080 XBRITE-HiColor
    P8400 2.26GHz | 4GB DDR2 | 320GB 7200rpm | ATI 3650

    Previous Computers
    HP 6720s | Toshiba A200-1IZ | Asus M50 | Dell Studio17

  6. #6
    Notebook Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    43
    Rep Power
    21

    Default Re: Sony FW Ati 3650m, is it that bad?

    Be happy you get the 3650, I made a mistake when ordering and got the 3470. Good enough for some older games, but not enough for the games I want to play on it

  7. #7
    His Imperial Majesty
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Kilrath
    Posts
    1,238
    Rep Power
    15

    Default Re: Sony FW Ati 3650m, is it that bad?

    Quote Originally Posted by the_1 View Post
    Specs wise, the Gateway is unbeatable. Otherwise I'd still choose the FW any day.
    What!? other than the nVidia 9800 (which is not a plus for me, no mobile nVidia GPUs for me after the problems I've had with the 8600GT in my other laptop) this thing is 9.1 lbs!! That spec alone would make it a no go, even without the nVidia baggage. Add to that, no bluetooth and no Bluray. Gotta say, the Sony is a much better value. If you must have nVidia GPU power, the HP 17" models have Bluray and weigh less than the Gateway. But for style Sony is the Apple of the PC world!

    Cheers,
    Trust, but locate the doors,
    For SALE - M17xR3 i7-2720|16GB|256GB SSD|750GB WD BLK|AMD 6990
    Lenovo Y510 SLI Nvidia 750m, 12GB, 500GB SSD + 24GB SSD
    iPad Verizon LTE 64GB
    flickr *** Panzer06 Marketplace Feedback Here***
    Alienware M17xR3 For Sale

  8. #8
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    434
    Rep Power
    13

    Default Re: Sony FW Ati 3650m, is it that bad?

    i play L4D at 1680*1050 with all high settings on my T500, the frame rates are decent with no stuttering. 3650 is a good card and most of my games work fine.

    only Gaming try sager.

  9. #9
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    345
    Rep Power
    14

    Default Re: Sony FW Ati 3650m, is it that bad?

    17inch HPs have the 9600 or 9650GT Nvidias, quite close to the ATI 3650, but far from the stellar 9800.
    Current Computer
    Sony Vaio FW290JAB 16.4" 1920x1080 XBRITE-HiColor
    P8400 2.26GHz | 4GB DDR2 | 320GB 7200rpm | ATI 3650

    Previous Computers
    HP 6720s | Toshiba A200-1IZ | Asus M50 | Dell Studio17

  10. #10
    sees beauty in everything
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    5,921
    Rep Power
    41

    Default Re: Sony FW Ati 3650m, is it that bad?

    Quote Originally Posted by the_1 View Post
    17inch HPs have the 9600 or 9650GT Nvidias, quite close to the ATI 3650, but far from the stellar 9800.
    A 9600 or 9650GT will beat out a 3650 in most areas.

 

 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:44 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0