Quantcast The 2012 Samsung Series 9 13.3" (NP900X3B) - Page 83

+ Reply to Thread
Page 83 of 231 FirstFirst ... 337379808182838485868793133183 ... LastLast
Results 821 to 830 of 2305
Like Tree7Likes

Thread: The 2012 Samsung Series 9 13.3" (NP900X3B)

  1. #821
    Notebook Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    12
    Rep Power
    3

    Default Re: The New 2012 Samsung Series 9 13.3"

    I haven't noticed any heat or excessive fan noise from mine, when the fans are running you can barely hear them. I think its only kicked in once or twice in the 3 days I've been using it. I had a Macbook before this and long bouts of video playback would make resting it on your lap a painful experience, I have not had the same experience with the S9, quite the opposite actually. I'm loving this thing.

    Quote Originally Posted by SoundsGood View Post
    Hey guys, how warm or hot (or cool?) does this thing get on the bottom after it's been running for a few hours?

    Thanks.

  2. #822
    Moderately inquisitive
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Swindon, UK
    Posts
    22,208
    Rep Power
    113

    Default Re: The New 2012 Samsung Series 9 13.3"

    Quote Originally Posted by isosunrise View Post
    Why would lower resolution have a smaller footprint? That won't affect the screen size, would it?
    1440 x 900 would be 16:10 with proprortionately less width and more height, which is what many users prefer - much better for working with documents and web browsing.

    John

  3. #823
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    373
    Rep Power
    13

    Default Re: The New 2012 Samsung Series 9 13.3"

    Yes, but if you have two 13.3" screens, one with 1600x900 and the other 1440x900, how would the "footprint" be smaller. Shouldn't the footprint be the same? It is the same size screen no? Just more or less pixels in the same amount of space. I must be missing something.

  4. #824
    Moderately inquisitive
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Swindon, UK
    Posts
    22,208
    Rep Power
    113

    Default Re: The New 2012 Samsung Series 9 13.3"

    Look at a photo of the 13.3" S9 and you will see a big bottom bezel and some unused space at each side of the keyboard. A 1440 x 900 panel would have more height (0.5") and less width (0.3") than a 1600 x 900 panel. This would use some of the space occupied by the bottom bezel (oversized in order to get the lid to match the chassis depth which is controlled by keyboard + touchpad) while allowing a narrow machine. The result is an overall smaller footprint.

    I've got my task bar placed vertically on the left side of my screen but I still find it difficult to make full use of the wide screen, except for the occasional movie watching.

    John

  5. #825
    Notebook Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    4,871
    Rep Power
    25

    Default Re: The New 2012 Samsung Series 9 13.3"

    Quote Originally Posted by isosunrise View Post
    Yes, but if you have two 13.3" screens, one with 1600x900 and the other 1440x900, how would the "footprint" be smaller. Shouldn't the footprint be the same? It is the same size screen no? Just more or less pixels in the same amount of space. I must be missing something.
    The physical screen (Height and Width) can be different and still have a 13.3" diagonal line. The Mac screen is slightly more square for the 1440x900 native res. The SS9 screen is more of a rectangle. So you end up have the same vertical resolution but another 160 pixels of horizontal resolution for the all important email preview pane. Or columns on a spreadsheet. Or property pane and toolbox in an IDE.

  6. #826
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    373
    Rep Power
    13

    Default Re: The New 2012 Samsung Series 9 13.3"

    OK, I think I understand now. Thanks for the inputs.

  7. #827
    Notebook Virtuoso
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    3,251
    Rep Power
    29

    Default

    Actually guys... I just meant that I prefer the smaller footprint of the 13" S9 over the larger footprint of the 15" version. But since 1600x900 on a 13" screen is probably too much for my eyes, I wish the resolution was 1440x900 instead, which would make things a little easier on my eyes (due to a lower overall PPI). The way things are now, I might be forced to go with the 15" model since I'm fine with 1600x900 on a 15" screen. Does that make sense?

    I also happen to prefer a 16:10 ratio over 16:9, but that's a separate issue.

    Sorry for the confusion.
    Current Laptop
    14" Samsung Series 7 NP700Z3C-S02US

    Previous Computers
    Sony Vaio FW, Dell Latitude D420, Dell Inspiron 6000, Commodore 64, TRS-80, TI-30 Calculator

  8. #828
    Moderately inquisitive
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Swindon, UK
    Posts
    22,208
    Rep Power
    113

    Default Re: The New 2012 Samsung Series 9 13.3"

    FWIW:

    1440 x 900 @ 14.1" = 120 ppi (pixels per inch)
    1600 x 900 @ 14" = 131 ppi
    1600 x 900 @ 15" = 122 ppi
    1440 x 900 @ 13.3" = 128 ppi
    1600 x 900 @ 13.3" = 138 ppi

    1600 x 900 @ 15.2 is approximately 1440 x 900 @ 14.1" with an extra 1.1" added on the side (and 0.12" less height).

    Good quality displays with bright backlights are usable at higher ppi (a bit like having good lighting helps to read the small print in a book).

    John

  9. #829
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    215
    Rep Power
    13

    Default Re: The New 2012 Samsung Series 9 13.3"

    Quote Originally Posted by John Ratsey View Post
    Good quality displays with bright backlights are usable at higher ppi (a bit like having good lighting helps to read the small print in a book).
    I have been able to get around the smaller font sizes by fiddling with all my apps so that they are zoomed by default at 110% - 125% (I know this doesn't work for you, SoundsGood, with two different monitors). Still there are plenty of labels, etc. that don't zoom, and I'm finding it surprisingly easy to read the tiny print on this screen, so Ratsey is definitely right. I regularly have two documents side by side, and the wider screen is fantastic for that.

    My HDD is the Samsung, and my HDD WEI is 7.9.

    As for heat: my dell was running between 55 and 60ish all the time with modest web browsing and word processing (hence the constant fan noise-- fan would kick in as soon as I got over 60). For about two days I had an MBA that got hot on my lap and ALSO had fan noise like a hair dryer from time to time. This thing is almost always under 50. Stays cool in my lap. When the fan does go, it's hard to hear (and I'm not sure how many times in a week that I have heard the fan), and when it does get "warm" it's hard to tell that it's warm. Just last night I was marveling at it-- what did they DO to keep it this cool? There's a Samsung ad that claims they put 20,000 hours into engineering this thing. I guess they must be telling the truth.

  10. #830
    Notebook Guru
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    53
    Rep Power
    3

    Default Re: The New 2012 Samsung Series 9 13.3"

    Anyone know if it's possible to reverse the direction of the trackpad scrolling?

    Screws me up now that I've gotten so used to scrolling on my mac.

    Just a note for another couple of bugs: Last night after waking from sleep my Cntl key was stuck in the down stroke (but the key itself wasn't stuck) I pressed it a few times and all was normal again.
    Also my wifi signal dropped to one bar for 5 minutes then back up to 5 (20 feet from the router).

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:11 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0