Quantcast Crucial M4 128GB vs 256GB Performance on P150EM SE

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22
  1. #1
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    192
    Rep Power
    14

    Default Crucial M4 128GB vs 256GB Performance on P150EM SE

    I already asked the question in the hardware forums but I did not get the response I wanted; they all talked about how much the PC can read/write. So this is a P150EM SE specific question

    Both Crucial M4 128GB and 256GB have the same read speed but the 256 has a higher write speed. How much better would the performance be with a 256GB drive vs a 128GB?
    Sager NP9150
    15.6" FHD LED Backlit Matte 95% Color Gamut | Intel® Core™ i7-3720QM |AMD Radeon HD 7970M | 8GB 1600MHz RAM | 128GB Crucial M4 SSD | 750GB 7200RPM HDD | IC Diamond | Intel® Ultimate-N 6300 |

  2. #2
    Notebook Geek
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    93
    Rep Power
    6

    Default Re: Crucial M4 128GB vs 256GB Performance on P150EM SE

    Doubt u'd notice the difference at all, however the reason to go for the 256 is simply cos it's larger and if it's within your budget it means u can have more of your applications and games on a faster drive.

  3. #3
    Notebook Deity
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    743
    Rep Power
    8

    Default Re: Crucial M4 128GB vs 256GB Performance on P150EM SE

    The 256GB drive writes twice as fast, so if for some reason you were using hibernation on a SSD it would cut hibernation times in half. If you were transferring files over from another SSD over usb3, it would also halve your transfer time. Is that what you're looking for?
    18 months of research and finally a new laptop! Ordered 4/29/12, shipped 5/30/12, arrived 6/6/12-
    Mythlogic pollux 1612/Clevo P150EM |95% gamut matte |3720QM |675m |2x4GB@1600Mhz |2x500GB in RAID0 |Intel 6235 |
    will eventually upgrade to: |3860QM |7970m |4x8GB@1600Mhz |2x1TB@5400RPM in RAID0 |Killer 1202 |Steelseries keyboard |
    Undead Frankenstein laptop: IBM thinkpad T4?
    Reluctant backup browser: a 3DS

  4. #4
    Notebook Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    55
    Rep Power
    6

    Default Re: Crucial M4 128GB vs 256GB Performance on P150EM SE

    Quote Originally Posted by E.Blar View Post
    The 256GB drive writes twice as fast, so if for some reason you were using hibernation on a SSD it would cut hibernation times in half. If you were transferring files over from another SSD over usb3, it would also halve your transfer time. Is that what you're looking for?
    That would be the noticeable differences between 128GB and 256GB M4 drives. However, if you have an SSD, you probably would not even need hibernation mode as simply turning your laptop off and then on again would take approximately the same amount of time as resuming from hibernation. I have disabled hibernation (it saves approximately 4GB in your SSD) and have not seen the need to enable it since boot times with the SSD is 15s max.

    You probably will not write files from another SSD over USB, as SSDs do not have a very good price per storage space ratio, and most people get HDDs as back up drives. However, if you do need to copy files from another SSD, be it from another computer or a standalone external drive, having a 256GB M4 will save you a few minutes.

    If it is within your budget, go ahead and get the 256GB M4; extra space is always useful. However, the everyday benefits of a 256GB drive over a 128GB drive (other than double the storage space) are not significant enough to justify purchasing the 256GB drive just for the additional write speeds.

    Benchmakers will say otherwise though...
    SAGER NP9130 | GenTech PC
    | 15.6" FHD Matte-Type 95% NTSC Color Gamut | Intel® Core™ i5-2450M | nVIDIA® GeForce GTX 670M | 8GB 1600MHz | 128 GB Crucial M4 SSD | 500 GB 7200RPM HDD | Bigfoot networks Killer Wireless-N 1103 |

  5. #5
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Toronto, Canada!
    Posts
    461
    Rep Power
    12

    Default Re: Crucial M4 128GB vs 256GB Performance on P150EM SE

    The main difference between the 128 and 256 is clearly the size, but whats important about the size is that when an SSD is nearly full it starts degrading in performance so thats something to think about.
    Accessories - | Sennheiser IE800 | HHKB Pro 2 | BenQ XL2420TX |

  6. #6
    Notebook Deity
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,646
    Rep Power
    15

    Default Re: Crucial M4 128GB vs 256GB Performance on P150EM SE

    mortalcombat and city,

    Any links to articles regarding M4 write speeds or performance degredation when drive fills up?
    Clevo x7200 from AVA Direct | intel i7 - 970 Hexcore 12MB L3 Cache, @ 3.20GHz (stock) | 12 GB Corsair RAM DDR3 SDRAM @ 1333MHz | nVidia GTX 460M GPU with 1.5GB GDDR5 | Crucial C300 256 GB SSD system disk | 500 GB (2 x RAID-1) Seagate Momentus XT Hybrid data disk
    See the Clevo x7200/Sager NP7280 Wiki Page
    Make sure you're up to date - x7200/NP7280 BIOS / Drivers

  7. #7
    de_dust2
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    3,885
    Rep Power
    23

    Default Re: Crucial M4 128GB vs 256GB Performance on P150EM SE

    Quote Originally Posted by jclausius View Post
    mortalcombat and city,

    Any links to articles regarding M4 write speeds or performance degredation when drive fills up?
    I'm jaug1337-

    -but here you go

    Droplr•510 vs m4

    SOURCE: Cost Of More Space, m4's Over-Provisioning : Crucial m4 And Intel SSD 320: The Other SSD Competitors

  8. #8
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    528
    Rep Power
    9

    Default Re: Crucial M4 128GB vs 256GB Performance on P150EM SE

    What exactly is "nearly full?" I have the 128GB M4 and can never boot faster than 25 seconds. The drive only has about 55 gigs written on it, is this difference entirely because I'm using SATA II and not III?

  9. #9
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    192
    Rep Power
    14

    Default Re: Crucial M4 128GB vs 256GB Performance on P150EM SE

    Quote Originally Posted by Tyranids View Post
    What exactly is "nearly full?" I have the 128GB M4 and can never boot faster than 25 seconds. The drive only has about 55 gigs written on it, is this difference entirely because I'm using SATA II and not III?
    I doubt that 55GB is considered full. But I'm pretty sure the 25 secs is due to SATA II since you're not using the full bandwidth
    Sager NP9150
    15.6" FHD LED Backlit Matte 95% Color Gamut | Intel® Core™ i7-3720QM |AMD Radeon HD 7970M | 8GB 1600MHz RAM | 128GB Crucial M4 SSD | 750GB 7200RPM HDD | IC Diamond | Intel® Ultimate-N 6300 |

  10. #10
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    528
    Rep Power
    9

    Default Re: Crucial M4 128GB vs 256GB Performance on P150EM SE

    Quote Originally Posted by mortalcombat View Post
    I doubt that 55GB is considered full. But I'm pretty sure the 25 secs is due to SATA II since you're not using the full bandwidth
    Thank god. I was slightly worried actually. People post shots of even regular HDDs booting in around the same time I can, so I was wondering what was wrong.

 

 
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:41 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2
Copyright © 2014 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1