Quantcast New 2012 Models Speculation Thread - PxxxEM Series (P151EM, P150EM, P170EM) - Page 12

+ Reply to Thread
Page 12 of 157 FirstFirst ... 289101112131415162262112 ... LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 1569
  1. #111
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    479
    Rep Power
    6

    Default Re: Semi Accurate/speculative pricing and details on P150EM

    Quote Originally Posted by Saltius View Post
    Performance:
    550M < GT555M=GT635M < GT650M

    So GT650M is not a rebadged GT550M.
    Lets hope so! I still dont think its a 28nm part.. If nvidia really rebrands the 570m and 580m

    The naming isnt a good indication though, especially with nvidia, there are often times cards with higher numbers which have slower perfomance, their naming is messed up

    Quote Originally Posted by TheBluePill
    nVidia has a very long, proud, tradition of screwing the pooch on product names. I mean.. Surely an 8800-GTX is Faster than a GTX-280? Right? oh.. Wait.. How about a GeForce 405, has to be a LOT faster than a GeForce 295.. I mean.. its a whopping 110 more!!

  2. #112
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Blassed City of Banyan Trees
    Posts
    318
    Rep Power
    7

    Default Re: Semi Accurate/speculative pricing and details on P150EM

    GT650M
    Spoiler :


    GF108(GT425M/GT435M/GT525M/GT540M/GT550M)
    Spoiler :


    You may check their difference.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails gt650m_another.jpg   GF108.jpg  
    Sager NP9261 rev5.2
    QX9650 Apacer DDR2 800 2*2GB
    3*WD2500BEKT Raid 0 + WD7500BPVT@ODD BAY
    GTX280M 1GB and GTX280M 512MB NON-BRIDGED SLI

  3. #113
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    479
    Rep Power
    6

    Default Re: Semi Accurate/speculative pricing and details on P150EM

    what does that proof? as I said there are many revisions of the 555m for example and many variations..

    especially moving from the gf106 to gf116 the 555m chip had some changes... So the 650m chip will probably also look different than the 550m
    Im not saying the 650m is completely the same chip, but It will probably not be significantly more powerful than the 550m if the 670m is only about 5 - 10 Percent faster than the 570m

    And as you see in the pictures the die size looks nearly the same

  4. #114
    de_dust2
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    3,764
    Rep Power
    20

    Default Re: Semi Accurate/speculative pricing and details on P150EM

    Quote Originally Posted by gamba66 View Post
    what does that proof? as I said there are many revisions of the 555m for example and many variations..

    especially moving from the gf106 to gf116 the 555m chip had some changes... So the 650m chip will probably also look different than the 550m
    Im not saying the 650m is completely the same chip, but It will probably not be significantly more powerful than the 550m if the 670m is only about 5 - 10 Percent faster than the 570m

    And as you see in the pictures the die size looks nearly the same
    Yep nearly, but they aren't laid up next to each other so it's hard to tell by eye

  5. #115
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Blassed City of Banyan Trees
    Posts
    318
    Rep Power
    7

    Default Re: Semi Accurate/speculative pricing and details on P150EM

    Quote Originally Posted by gamba66 View Post
    Here is a picture of the 540m chip (which the 550m is based on) which looks like a similiar size to the 650m

    Spoiler :
    It is not a 540m chip but MCP79MXT-B2 with GeForce 9400M integrated.
    Last edited by Saltius; 25th February 2012 at 07:23 AM.
    Sager NP9261 rev5.2
    QX9650 Apacer DDR2 800 2*2GB
    3*WD2500BEKT Raid 0 + WD7500BPVT@ODD BAY
    GTX280M 1GB and GTX280M 512MB NON-BRIDGED SLI

  6. #116
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    479
    Rep Power
    6

    Default Re: Semi Accurate/speculative pricing and details on P150EM

    yes but the other chip is from the y570 mainboard and from your picture too

    so whats your point? the die size from the 650m to the 550m isnt different as you originally claimed as you can see in these pictures

    Quote Originally Posted by gamba66
    Here is even a picture of the 550m from the y570 mainboard (the chip on the top of the picture)

    Spoiler :


    And here the clevo 11.6 inch with 650m from your picture

    Spoiler :

  7. #117
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Blassed City of Banyan Trees
    Posts
    318
    Rep Power
    7

    Default Re: Semi Accurate/speculative pricing and details on P150EM

    Quote Originally Posted by gamba66 View Post
    yes but the other chip is from the y570 mainboard and from your picture too

    so whats your point? the die size from the 650m to the 550m isnt different as you originally claimed
    What I claimed is 650m and 555m have different die sizes while GT650M has higher performance than GT555m and of coz GT550M.

    Many chips have similar die size as GF108(e.g. G96B). Does it mean GF108 a rebadge of G96B?
    Sager NP9261 rev5.2
    QX9650 Apacer DDR2 800 2*2GB
    3*WD2500BEKT Raid 0 + WD7500BPVT@ODD BAY
    GTX280M 1GB and GTX280M 512MB NON-BRIDGED SLI

  8. #118
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    479
    Rep Power
    6

    Default Re: Semi Accurate/speculative pricing and details on P150EM

    Quote Originally Posted by Saltius View Post
    What I claimed is 650m and 555m has different die sizes and GT650M has higher performance than GT555m and GT550M.

    Many chips have similar die size as GF108(e.g G96B). Does it mean GF108 a rebadge of G96B?
    you were the one that mentioned different die sizes as an explanation for the 650m being kepler, remember?

    Its kind of obvious the 650m and 555m have different die sizes, since the 650m is the followup of the 550m and belongs to another perfomance class then the 555m which belongs to the enthusiast class.. So why do you compare two chips which are different in the first place ^^

    So if you compare the 650m, then compare it to its predecessor the 550m (which look about the same size)^^

  9. #119
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Blassed City of Banyan Trees
    Posts
    318
    Rep Power
    7

    Default Re: Semi Accurate/speculative pricing and details on P150EM

    Quote Originally Posted by gamba66 View Post
    you were the one that mentioned different die sizes as an explanation for the 650m being kepler, remember?

    Its kind of obvious the 650m and 555m have different die sizes, since the 650m is the followup of the 550m and belongs to another perfomance class then the 555m which belongs to the enthusiast class.. So why do you compare two chips which are different in the first place ^^

    So if you compare the 650m, then compare it to its predecessor the 550m (which look about the same size)^^
    Then how can you prove 650M a rebadged 550m?
    How can you explain an over-class performance increase?
    Sager NP9261 rev5.2
    QX9650 Apacer DDR2 800 2*2GB
    3*WD2500BEKT Raid 0 + WD7500BPVT@ODD BAY
    GTX280M 1GB and GTX280M 512MB NON-BRIDGED SLI

  10. #120
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    479
    Rep Power
    6

    Default Re: Semi Accurate/speculative pricing and details on P150EM

    Ask nvidia how they come up with such crappy naming schemes haha

    Lets just wait and see, if were lucky we will get some definite answers when the Cebit in Germany starts (Maybe im going there since I live in Germany) on the 6th of March.. Its rumoured that all the notebookvendors display their new IVB products there

    I thought about taking my USB Stick with me, with some benchmark programms and hwinfo apps like gpu-z and so on and just get some real numbers from the notebooks shown there (IF they are shown there)

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:35 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0