Quantcast Comparing laptops under $1000 with CUDA enabled GPU

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 33
  1. #1
    Notebook Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    55
    Rep Power
    14

    Default Comparing laptops under $1000 with CUDA enabled GPU

    Hi - I want to buy a laptop to do scientific numerical simulations (N-body codes, kinetic growth, molecular dynamics, quantum monte carlo) in C or C++. I am trying to find a laptop that is exceptionally fast, that will let me do powerful simulations with tons of floating point calculations, that isn't too bogged down with stuff that would be mostly useless for me - "gaming intensive" stuff, I suppose. I don't plan on ever playing any games on my laptop, so... I think there's a lot of stuff I won't need.

    I have been booking at Sager laptops and I'm not sure which one will suit my needs. I have $1800 but I don't want to spend all of it if I don't need to, of course. I mainly want to make sure that I get a laptop with an NVIDIA GPU that will let me use CUDA so I can do some intense computing.

    So I am looking at a bunch of Sagers, IE the NP7682, NP7350, NP2096, NP8662, NP5793 etc. My question is why exactly should I get one over the other, if they can all be upgraded to a T9800 core? I can sort of rationalize the NP7350 over the NP7682 because the 7350 is smaller...

    Then there's things that I just absolutely do NOT need like the NP2096's "fingerprint reader." Which Sager will give me the most bang for my specific needs - a CUDA enabled GPU, no special gaming or graphics bells or whistles, (I'm not going to play Crysis!), just raw speed that will let me take advantage of CUDA?

    Sorry if my questions are haphazard, I'm writing this during a ten minute break! Give me some Clevo/Sager guidance here, I don't want to spend $1800 when I could have gotten all I want with $1400 or $1200 or less! I'm probably going to ask a bunch of really annoying questions but I'd rather be safe than sorry.

    Right now I'm leaning toward the NP7682 with T9800 and 4GB SRAM, but wondering why I should perhaps spend more for the NP2096 or NP8662? Are there are reasons that will matter for me, where my primary interests are processing speed and taking advantage of CUDA on the GPU?
    Last edited by Signifier; 20th April 2009 at 05:11 PM.

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    5,427
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: Comparing laptops under $1000 with CUDA enabled GPU

    You obviously need a high end CPU, Quad core would be ideal for simulations but they are far exceed your budget. 7682 with T9800 seems like a good choice but the GPU is integrated, which means no CUDA for you. What about 2096 with T9800 and 9600M GT?

  3. #3
    Notebook Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    55
    Rep Power
    14

    Default Re: Comparing laptops under $1000 with CUDA enabled GPU

    Hmm, okay. I'm not too worried about Quad core vs. Dual core, I am sort of under the impression that getting a faster GHz dual core is better than a slower quad core...

    Well, I would like to use CUDA if at all possible. So if 7682 won't let me use CUDA I won't get the 7682. Will any of the Sager laptops under $1000 to start with let me use CUDA? ??

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    5,427
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: Comparing laptops under $1000 with CUDA enabled GPU

    Hmm, okay. I'm not too worried about Quad core vs. Dual core, I am sort of under the impression that getting a faster GHz dual core is better than a slower quad core...
    That's because the old apps/games are not programmed to be multi-threaded. So basically they only use 1 core no matter what, thus, higher clocking = faster.

    Will any of the Sager laptops under $1000 to start with let me use CUDA? ??
    You have to balance between CPU and GPU.
    1) High end CPU, no GPU
    2) Dedicated GPU, average CPU.

  5. #5
    Notebook Virtuoso
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,400
    Rep Power
    29

    Default Re: Comparing laptops under $1000 with CUDA enabled GPU

    CUDA technology is used by Nvidia cards. Get an medium level Nvidia card like the 9600m GT.

    I recommend you got a fast core 2 duo processor, the time to wait for the quad core ability is not worth your time and may not be necessary to go over budget.

    The Sager 2096 would honestly be your best bet if you want to go with a Sager.

    That or you could find a M860TU that has the 9600m GT.
    Asus N61JQ-A1
    16" HD WXGA LED 16:9, i7-720QM, 4GB DDR3, 500GB 7200RPM, 4X Blu-Ray Burner, Mobility Radeon HD5730; 2-3 hours battery life

  6. #6
    Notebook Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    55
    Rep Power
    14

    Default Re: Comparing laptops under $1000 with CUDA enabled GPU

    OK, so let me try to get this annoyingly clear - the 2096 will let me use CUDA? I look at CUDA's enabled product list (at http://www.nvidia.com/object/cuda_learn_products.html) and the GeForce 9600M GT (which Sager's site says the 2096 has) is listed as a CUDA enabled product. Also on the CUDA enabled product list is the GeForce G105M GPU, which the NP7682 has. So I'm assuming that I'm missing something, if the 2096 is CUDA enabled and the 7682 is not CUDA enabled (considering NVIDIA says the GPUs of both are CUDA enabled).

    Dedicated GPU, average CPU. But what is an "average" CPU? If I get an NP2096 with T9800, will I have a dedicated GPU? Will I have an average CPU? Just based on price range, I could go for Sager 5797 with Core 2 extreme 3.06 GHz and upwards of a $3500 price tag. Is this more in line with an "above average CPU" and a dedicated GPU? (I think I'd be fine with a dedicated GPU and an average CPU, but again, what is average?)

    I am not sure if I will go for Sager. They just have a friendly site to look through products and customize. I am also considering Clevo and the M860TU or M865TU. For Clevos, can I "get" a 2.9+ GHz processor as I can from Sager? ("Get" in the sense of easily get, for someone with very little computer hardware savvy.) Would a Clevo be a better option than a Sager?

    I live in Medford, OR, and I'm not sure if I'll be able to find any of these things locally very easily although my friend said there may be a Clevo dealer in Medford, but their selection is poor. Right now I am just searching for the optimal balance between price and processing.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    5,427
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: Comparing laptops under $1000 with CUDA enabled GPU

    1) 9600M GT - dedicated GPU; G105M - integrated GPU
    2) G105M - low end level; 9600M GT - average level; 9800M, GT260M/GTX280M - high end level
    3) Sager buy laptops from Clevo; you can't buy from Clevo, unless you are ordering lot of 1000 or so.

    As said your best bet would be 2096 with T9800 and 9600M GT. End of story.

  8. #8
    Notebook Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    55
    Rep Power
    14

    Default Re: Comparing laptops under $1000 with CUDA enabled GPU

    OK. I think I understand a bit better now. I am looking at the 2096 closely. Now I begin the hunt for the best price and service.

  9. #9
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    249
    Rep Power
    16

    Default Re: Comparing laptops under $1000 with CUDA enabled GPU

    But just so you know I think sager reputation come from their clevo models and the NP2096 is a compal which I don't think has the same build quality as clevo although I have never seen a compal so you'd have to ask a compal owner
    Clevo Dell M4400 (CAD Laptop) | P8400 | 4GB DDR3 | FX 770M 512MB | Vista Business x64| 15" WUXGA RGB LED | 80GB Intel X25-M G2 | 80GB@7200RPM MODULAR BAY

  10. #10
    Notebook Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    55
    Rep Power
    14

    Default Re: Comparing laptops under $1000 with CUDA enabled GPU

    Yes, that is another worrying thing. Can anyone speak to this? Does anyone have experience with a 2096? How good is it? The T9800 and 9600M GT seems like a good combination for a good price, but I understand that the 2096 is not based on a Clevo.

    Just going off of Sager's website, I see that for a few hundred $ more I can get a NP5793 which is Clevo, but this is with a T9300 instead of a T9800, plus it's 17" (I'd prefer 15.4" or less). I'm not sure if this is an upgrade or not?

    Should I look beyond Sager? Could I get a Clevo-based model, with a T9800 or comparable speed processor, dedicated GPU etc., not from Sager, for comparable prices?

 

 
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:33 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2
Copyright © 2014 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1