+ Reply to Thread
Results 51 to 60 of 93
-
30th May 2011, 08:03 AM #51
-
30th May 2011, 08:05 AM #52
-
31st May 2011, 01:47 AM #53Notebook Consultant
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Posts
- 206
- Rep Power
- 6
Re: Kingston HyperX Memory Review Discussion
So, regardless of issues, are you guys seeing better performance at 1866 vs standard 1333? Better QuickSync performance on video renders?
Last edited by DeusExMachina; 31st May 2011 at 02:09 AM.
HP Pavilion dv6-6091nr QuickShip Unit, i7 2630QM, 6 GB RAM, 1 TB 5400 RPM Drive
Planned Upgrades: Hybrid Hard Drive Hyper Memory RAM Dual Monitor Setup Makes 2 Finger Scroll Actually Work
Work: I design and develop this stuff here Twitter
-
31st May 2011, 09:52 AM #54Notebook Nobel Laureate
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Posts
- 10,364
- Rep Power
- 57
Re: Kingston HyperX Memory Review Discussion
No difference in real life performance since the memory downclocks to 1333MHz on dual core units and 1600MHz on quad core ones, despite supporting up to 1866MHz. Though realistically, even if it did, the benefits would be pretty small (ie. only visible on benchmarks) as increased frequency is balanced by increased latency.
-
31st May 2011, 10:01 AM #55Notebook Evangelist
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Posts
- 459
- Rep Power
- 10
Re: Kingston HyperX Memory Review Discussion
Last edited by huberth; 31st May 2011 at 10:21 AM.
Lenovo Thinkpad W520 (i7-2820QM-NVIDIAQuadro2000M-15.6"-1920x1080(LED-95%Gamut-ColorSensor) RAM:16GB (1600MHz) - 2x240GB Intel 510 SSDs (Firmware:PWG4) in RAID 0 - BIOS 1.38 - WEI: 7.5-7.8-6.9-6.9-7.9 - PCMarkVantage:19,228 PCMark7: 4,568
Samsung Series 9 15-inch NP900X4C-A03US LITEONIT LMT-256M3M SSD - WEI: 7.1-7.5-6.4-6.4-7.9 - PCMark7: 4674
-
31st May 2011, 10:06 AM #56Notebook Evangelist
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Posts
- 459
- Rep Power
- 10
Re: Kingston HyperX Memory Review Discussion
Also check out this review:
The performance numbers from upgrading the memory was insane. We saw performance gains from 6% to 86% depending on the benchmarks with the largest performance gains coming from graphics intensive games
Kingston HyperX 8GB 1866MHz PnP Memory Kit For Notebooks - Final Thoughts and Conclusions - Legit Reviews
(unfortunately they made the same mistake as Notebookreview, comparing 6GB of slow memory with 8GB of fast memory)Lenovo Thinkpad W520 (i7-2820QM-NVIDIAQuadro2000M-15.6"-1920x1080(LED-95%Gamut-ColorSensor) RAM:16GB (1600MHz) - 2x240GB Intel 510 SSDs (Firmware:PWG4) in RAID 0 - BIOS 1.38 - WEI: 7.5-7.8-6.9-6.9-7.9 - PCMarkVantage:19,228 PCMark7: 4,568
Samsung Series 9 15-inch NP900X4C-A03US LITEONIT LMT-256M3M SSD - WEI: 7.1-7.5-6.4-6.4-7.9 - PCMark7: 4674
-
31st May 2011, 10:37 AM #57
Re: Kingston HyperX Memory Review Discussion
Even genius without a proper knowledge can be mislead
CURRENT MSI GE70 0NC with CoolerMaster Notepal U3|3920XM @3.8GHzx4|UNLOCKED Overclocked GT 650M @1111MHz/8GB Corsair Vengeance 1600Mhz CL9 RAM|1920x1080 FullHD MATTE screen|Windows 7 Ultimate x64
SOLD Upgraded VAIO VPCF126FM with Coolermaster Notepal U2|I7-840QM with latest v.5 06E5 CPU microcode|8-8-8-21 1333Mhz Corsair OCed RAM|2xUSB 3.0 in ExpressCard|1600x900 LCD|Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Reducing/Removing Shortcut's Arrows
-
31st May 2011, 10:48 AM #58Notebook Nobel Laureate
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Posts
- 10,364
- Rep Power
- 57
Re: Kingston HyperX Memory Review Discussion
-
31st May 2011, 02:19 PM #59
Re: Kingston HyperX Memory Review Discussion
Update: Kingston are sending me two full kits to test, 1600 and 1866. Being a Lenovo Premium Business Partner I have aligned 3 different systems for that test, a 2720QM, 2820QM and 2920XM. I will test all systems in cominations of 8Gb and 16gb, at 1600Mhz and at 1866Mhz.
This should clear everything up I hope.
(Incidentally, Kingston mentioned that 2x4Gb is supported, 4x4Gb is not, regardless of memory speed. Reason potential memorycontroller overload.)
-
31st May 2011, 02:34 PM #60Notebook Evangelist
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Posts
- 459
- Rep Power
- 10
Re: Kingston HyperX Memory Review Discussion
Hmmm. 4x4GB HyperX works fine with my Thinkpad W520 and apparently with notebookreview's Thinkpad W520 in their tests as well.
Notebook Reviews - Laptop Reviews - PictureLast edited by huberth; 31st May 2011 at 02:55 PM.
Lenovo Thinkpad W520 (i7-2820QM-NVIDIAQuadro2000M-15.6"-1920x1080(LED-95%Gamut-ColorSensor) RAM:16GB (1600MHz) - 2x240GB Intel 510 SSDs (Firmware:PWG4) in RAID 0 - BIOS 1.38 - WEI: 7.5-7.8-6.9-6.9-7.9 - PCMarkVantage:19,228 PCMark7: 4,568
Samsung Series 9 15-inch NP900X4C-A03US LITEONIT LMT-256M3M SSD - WEI: 7.1-7.5-6.4-6.4-7.9 - PCMark7: 4674



LinkBack URL





Reply With Quote

I`m upgrading, are you? (GTX 780M...
Today, 02:34 AM in Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)