+ Reply to Thread
Results 81 to 90 of 206
-
13th March 2011, 09:06 PM #81Notebook Enthusiast
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Posts
- 30
- Rep Power
- 6
Re: Lenovo ThinkPad X220 Review Discussion
According to two different posts in this thread (1 & 2) it would seem there is no difference in reflectivity between GG and normal glass. So assuming the display tech is the same, the difference in glass isn't going to have an impact. If one offers an anti-reflectivity coating and the other doesn't, that would be the way to go.
-
13th March 2011, 09:12 PM #82Notebook Evangelist
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Posts
- 314
- Rep Power
- 16
Re: Lenovo ThinkPad X220 Review Discussion
I need the power and various options of the traditional x220, but I am worried that the IPS screen may not be bright enough (if I'm not mistaken, isn't the tablet screen brighter?). The peak brightness of the x220 according to notebookreview is 263 nit, which I know may not make it visible enough in sunlight. Anyone have any ideas on this?
Thanks!
-
13th March 2011, 09:15 PM #83Newbie
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Posts
- 5
- Rep Power
- 6
Re: Lenovo ThinkPad X220 Review Discussion
thanks vertigo, that makes sense
-
14th March 2011, 03:51 AM #84Notebook Evangelist
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 374
- Rep Power
- 19
Re: Lenovo ThinkPad X220 Review Discussion
I see no mention of the self-closing hinges in the review...any comments, Jerry? Perhaps a video? :P
-
14th March 2011, 09:19 AM #85
Re: Lenovo ThinkPad X220 Review Discussion
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you.
First, keep in mind that when you launch almost every modern game with decent graphics will pop up with an alert saying the video card is not supported. If you can select the option to "continue anyway" then you can move forward with seeing what is playable.
Mass Effect 2 plays at 1366x768 with all the settings turned down/off. You get some nasty frame drops in some places and the game doesn't look amazing with those settings turned down/off, but it's playable. The X220's fan kicks into overdrive, though.
Left 4 Dead 2 plays at 1366x768 with no AA, low shader detail, medium effect detail and high texture detail. You get some frame rate drops in large areas and when zombie hordes rush you.
Crysis Warhead plays at 1366x768 with the "mainstream" graphics settings. Quite a few nasty frame rate drops and one time the game crashed while I was playing it.
Just Cause 2 renders at 1366x768 and low settings but the frame rate is so choppy that it makes this relatively fast-paced game completely unplayable.
The original Left 4 Dead doesn't render properly on the new Intel graphics. I suspect the problem is driver related since Left 4 Dead 2 plays fine, but at this time none of the textures render correctly so you can't see what you're doing when you play. I didn't have time to test every possible variation of graphics settings, but the default settings and turning everything on low didn't help. As far as we can tell, the original Left 4 Dead isn't compatible with the latest Intel graphics.
It might also be worth mentioning that playing games like these for even a few minutes not only made the system fan go to the highest mode but it remained on high for quite a while after the games were turned off.
-
14th March 2011, 05:02 PM #86
Re: Lenovo ThinkPad X220 Review Discussion
Wow! Very nice machine!
Hmm ... I am still interested to see if the other 30 hour plus estimates for the 14 inch machines will work out to be accurate."It is a joyful thing indeed to hold intimate converse with a man after one’s own heart, chatting without reserve about things of interest or the fleeting topics of the world; but such, alas, are few and far between."
– Yoshida Kenko (1283-1350), [i]Tsurezure-Gusa (1340)
-
14th March 2011, 07:53 PM #87Notebook Evangelist
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Posts
- 433
- Rep Power
- 17
Re: Lenovo ThinkPad X220 Review Discussion
16:9 1366x768
You've got to be kidding...
First there was the X61 with 1400x1050
Then there was the X200 with 1440x900
Now we get the X220 with 1366x768
Really? 768 pixels? My phone has more pixels vertically than that.
And see again: there is absolutely no benefit to this widescreen mania. A giant dart board above and under the screen while any decrease in machine width is consumed by protuding batteries.
Why? Why don't we get 1400x1050?W520 2860QM, FHD, 1000M, 2x4GB, Crucial m4 256GB mSata, 500GB 7200rpm, 6205, BT, FPR, 9-cell, 7-row keyboard
T61 7664-16U with 7 cell battery, 3 GB RAM, WD3200BEKT and 2nd motherboard.
-
16th March 2011, 12:40 PM #88Newbie
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Posts
- 1
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: Lenovo ThinkPad X220 Review Discussion
Quite funny elpedro8!
I've been using a x31 for the past 5 years aswell, and I've been searching the net for the exactly the same question for quite som while
With this information, I'll be getting the x220!
Only negative is the added touchpad. I like the fact that other can't navigate my x31 as fast as I can. Actually I can navigate my x31 a lot faster than other people can navigate their laptops with touchpads.
-
17th March 2011, 02:08 AM #89Notebook Guru
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Posts
- 65
- Rep Power
- 6
Re: Lenovo ThinkPad X220 Review Discussion
Whats so good about the ips screen?
-
17th March 2011, 02:39 AM #90
Re: Lenovo ThinkPad X220 Review Discussion
In a single phrase; viewing angles. With your regular TN screens, if you tilt the panel more than a few degrees forward or back, the colors will shift, as you leave the viewing "sweet spot". IPS panels can be tilted something like 178 degrees without significant color shift. For a photographic example of the difference, you can look at this thread, the first and second posts.



LinkBack URL




Reply With Quote



I`m upgrading, are you? (GTX 780M...
Today, 12:09 AM in Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)