Closed Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 16
-
20th July 2010, 08:01 AM #1
ESET NOD32 Antivirus 4.2 Review Discussion
By Charles P. Jefferies
ESET NOD32 4 was one of our favorite antivirus suites last year -- does version 4.2 retain its first-class spot this year? Read our review to find out.
Read the full content of this Article: ESET NOD32 Antivirus 4.2 Review
Related Articles:
-
20th July 2010, 08:51 AM #2Notebook Consultant
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 157
- Rep Power
- 17
Re: ESET NOD32 Antivirus 4.2 Review Discussion
Great anti-virus software!
The only problem for paid virus software developers are the free anti-virs like AVG, Avast and even Microsoft Security Essentials. The free ones are on par with the paid software, so there is really no need for paying for anti-virus software.
Microsoft Security Essentials for example is great and combined with the built-in firewall from Windows 7 and a firewall on the router (which most internet users have), it blocks everything that can do harm to your pc. Other free anti-virus software does also a great job.
A year ago I always used NOD32 and it was really great, but now free anti-virus is as good as paid ones, there is no need for payed anti-virus software anymore
.
-
20th July 2010, 09:04 AM #3
Re: ESET NOD32 Antivirus 4.2 Review Discussion
Free antivirus software has improved greatly and is a viable solution for home users. That said, there are still some things that separate paid antivirus software. Paid AV usually updates more often and is typically more proactive. Paid AV also has better support and usually has a couple of extra features like antispam and antispyware. That is just in general, though.
I personally use ESET NOD32 Smart Security on all my computers.NotebookReview Writer & Reviewer
hp EliteBook 8740w 17" DreamColor2 1920x1200, Windows 7 Pro, Core i5-560M, ATI FirePro M7820, 8GB RAM, 120GB Intel 320 SSD, Intel 6300 WLAN
Notebook Warranty Guide | Computer Optimization Guide | SSD Upgrade Guide: How and Why
-
20th July 2010, 03:38 PM #4
Re: ESET NOD32 Antivirus 4.2 Review Discussion
$60+ dollars is still a lot of money.
Is it that much better than MSE and the much cheaper of let's say NORTON?( I just threw out a popular brand)
Great review.
DREAM MACHINE
MALIBAL Lotus P150HM--CPU 2820QM--GPU 580M GTX--300GB Intel SSD--8GB RAM
Coming soon CHAOS 1212!
-
20th July 2010, 03:44 PM #5
Re: ESET NOD32 Antivirus 4.2 Review Discussion
If it keeps those silly Scareware viruses off a computer I'll start recommending it, think you could run a test on that?
-
20th July 2010, 05:04 PM #6
Re: ESET NOD32 Antivirus 4.2 Review Discussion
I administer about 400 Eset protected computers and have been using it personally for years. A few things you're going to want to do after installing Nod32.
Turn off scanning of network drives in environments where the rest of the network is protected with its own agents. Scanning network drives isn't necessary in most scenarios.
F5 > Real-time file system protection > uncheck Network drives
Second, turn off Scan all files for real-time protection.
F5 > Real-time file system protection > Setup... > Extensions > uncheck Scan all files
This leaves the default extensions enabled that are the typical malware vectors.Last edited by slickie88; 20th July 2010 at 05:04 PM. Reason: typo

M11xR2 | i7-640UM | 8GB DDR3 | NVIDIA GT 335M | 500GB Momentus XT | BT | Killer 1103 | Stealth
:. Custom Fallout 3 OSD icons for the M11x
:. M11xR2 ICC profile for the AUO105C and Color Management configuration procedure
-
20th July 2010, 06:30 PM #7
Re: ESET NOD32 Antivirus 4.2 Review Discussion
I have been using NOD32 AV for a years now, from the time they introduced the new interface.
Reasons I like this:
-Proactive defense as the review mentioned, plugging in a USB disk, or other media results in a quick scan often showing viruses before Auto-run opens sites
-Even though I now use the basic AV program, it still blocks harmful sites, which is something most basic programs don't offer.
-Light takes on 50MB, and even when running scans, doesn't raise CPU usage too much, I run this on an old desktop with 256MB Ram, on which an number of other programs totally choked the system before I thought to install NOD on another of my systems ( the chokers were all the usual free programs
)
Great review Chaz, good to see newer versions are still doing well
Aspire 5930 - RIP
P8400 - 2.26Ghz | 4GB DDR2 | 9600M-GT DDR3 @1V | 250GB 5.4K | 15.4" WXGA | Se7en Pro x64|
Logitech G500 / Plantronics Gamecom 777s/ Sony XB-500
My Custom Painted 360 controller (CLICK )
Other Stuff iPod Classic | Nokia N8 | Galaxy S3 |
-
20th July 2010, 06:32 PM #84th Current Dell Precision M4500 15.6": Corei7|Quadro FX880M|mSata 256GB BF3+500GB 7200rpm|8GB DDR3|Win7 64bit
3rd Died old Asus N80Vn-X1 14.1"
2nd Fine old Thinkpad T61 14.1"
1st Died old Alienware M3200 12.1"
-
20th July 2010, 08:20 PM #9Notebook Geek
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Posts
- 81
- Rep Power
- 9
Re: ESET NOD32 Antivirus 4.2 Review Discussion
I use Linux (Fedora and CentOS) so I don't need to run any AV software!!!
If I had to run the other OS I would use the free versions like Avira, AVG etc. Back in the day when i was running windblows I remember what a hog Norton was. I have read how Norton has been greatly improved and runs fast and uses less resources. It's amazing what happens when the old guys now have to compete with free!!!!
-
21st July 2010, 12:52 AM #10
Re: ESET NOD32 Antivirus 4.2 Review Discussion
NOD32 is significantly less expensive if you can find a friend or two and club together for a multiple seat licence.
John



LinkBack URL








I`m upgrading, are you? (GTX 780M...
Today, 09:35 AM in Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)