Closed Thread
Results 21 to 30 of 55
-
3rd July 2009, 08:13 AM #21Notebook Consultant
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Posts
- 236
- Rep Power
- 14
Re: Kingston SSDNow V-Series Notebook Upgrade Kit Review
maybe you then didn't yet hit the degradation barrier. i have reinstalled my system a few times and had my system ssd nearly completely filled up several times. it's just a question of time when the drive will degradte. but it unfortunately definifively will sooner or later. that's why i'd never buy a jmicron ssd again, but rather recommend a samsung 128gb ssd, which you can get for just ~ 50 bucks more - with alot more performance.
a sata/ata/usb adapter cable costs about 10 dollars at ebay.
seriously, it's a nice performance upgrade in short/mid term. but in the long run it's really a waste of money, and this has been covered by money reviews before (like anandtech did). i was so stupid to not believe it, and was fascinated by the performance upgrade at first. now i regret that i just wasted my money and didn't listen to those advises to advoid the drives.
-
3rd July 2009, 01:50 PM #22
Re: Kingston SSDNow V-Series Notebook Upgrade Kit Review
I really like the looks of SSD drives and the direction they are going... I'm still probably going to wait a year though for prices to come down more and maybe capacity to go up a bit.
MALIBAL Lotus P151HM1
| 15.6" FHD LED Backlit Glossy | Intel Core i7 2630QM | NVIDIA GTX 560M | 8GB 1333MHz | 500GB HDD | Pure Awesome

-
3rd July 2009, 03:26 PM #23
Re: Kingston SSDNow V-Series Notebook Upgrade Kit Review
Yeah, performance may degrade eventually, but I've reformatted twice and have filled the drive up to ~90% each time, hence the reasoning behind the upgrade for size only. Haven't noticed any slowdown yet. Perhaps benchmarks would say otherwise though.
The 128GB Samsungs are about twice the price of the 128GB Kingston in Canada ($400 versus $210), which made the choice relatively easy.random process
HP EliteBook 2540p - Core i7 640LM / 4GB / Intel 160GB / Win7
Apple MacBook 13.3" - C2D P7350 / 3GB / Kingston 128GB SSD
Desktop - i5 750 / GigaByte GA-P55M-UD2 / 4x2GB PC3-13333 / SilverStone Sugo SG03 / 5850 1GB / Dell U2311H / Kingston 64GB SSD / WD 640GB
-
3rd July 2009, 04:39 PM #24
Re: Kingston SSDNow V-Series Notebook Upgrade Kit Review
Lets not kid ourselves here, until Intel lowers the price of the amazing X25 the masses will not start buying.
The read times are a joke, the Intel X25 is over 2.5 times faster in real world applications.Clevo M860TU - 15.4" WSXGA+/P8400/260M GTX/DDR3-1066 - Sennheiser CX300, Logitech G5, Enermax 250mm Fan Cooler
-
3rd July 2009, 05:49 PM #25
Re: Kingston SSDNow V-Series Notebook Upgrade Kit Review
How many of the masses are doing research on SSD's right now? The masses buy $500 acer laptops and are satisfied *shrug*
The masses will start buying when SSD's are commonly sold with notebooks.MALIBAL Lotus P151HM1
| 15.6" FHD LED Backlit Glossy | Intel Core i7 2630QM | NVIDIA GTX 560M | 8GB 1333MHz | 500GB HDD | Pure Awesome

-
3rd July 2009, 07:56 PM #26
Re: Kingston SSDNow V-Series Notebook Upgrade Kit Review
Sorry for the delay in getting these figures posted. My wife and daughter wanted my attention during the Friday before the 4th of July and IOMeter doesn't like partitioned storage drives.
In any case, since sequential read and write speeds, aren't good indicators of potential lag/stutter, I used IOMeter to examine the maximum random read and maximum random write speeds to reveal any potential lag/stuttering with small file sizes. For this test, I set IOMeter to 100% random commands of 4K size for read and write. These numbers should therefor represent the worst case scenario for any SSD or HDD with small file random reads and writes.
I didn't have a ton of drives available for comparison, and since IOMeter required me to remove any partitions from the drives I didn't want to destroy the data (or have to back it up) on multiple drives. I picked a 7200rpm notebook hard drive and a 10,000rpm desktop hard drive for performance comparisons.
The lower the score ... the better the performance.
Maximum Random Read Response Time
Maximum Random Write Response Time
128GB Kingston SSDNow V-Series
3.76ms
244.24ms
320GB Western Digital Scorpio Black Notebook HDD
67.88ms
69.91ms
300GB Western Digital Velociraptor Desktop HDD
28.74ms
31.13ms
Obviously, the Kingston V-Series SSD is extremely fast when it comes to random read performance, but the random write speed shows the Achilles Heel of the JMicron-based controller. We didn't have any other SSDs in our office with the JMicron controller, but after looking online at other sites it appears that other JMicron-based SSDs are even slower -- sometimes between two and three times slower than the Kingston V-Series in terms of random write performance -- and that's where the other SSDs start to show lag and stutter. Yes, 240+ milliseconds looks bad in print, but doesn't reflect lag/stutter in real life use ... at least not at this point in the life of this SSD.
Again, the team here at NBR will be bringing you more SSD coverage based on long-term testing ... our goal is to share "real life" performance results over time to show whether SSD performance and reliability drops after months of use rather than just using synthetic benchmarks to simulate the worst case scenario.
-
3rd July 2009, 10:09 PM #27
Re: Kingston SSDNow V-Series Notebook Upgrade Kit Review
Do you have the screenshots from IOMeter? MB/s and IOPS are more important than maximum response time, although the maximum response time is useful.
Thanks again for the time!||| Desktop: Antec 300, Intel Q6600, Asus P5Q Pro, ASUS Radeon HD 4870 1GB DK, 4x1GB OCZ DDR2 800, Xigmatek s1283, 30 GB OCZ Vertex SSD
||| Notebook: Acer AS1410, Intel SU2300, Intel X-25M 80GB SSD, upgraded 5800mAh battery
-
3rd July 2009, 10:11 PM #28Notebook Deity
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 1,711
- Rep Power
- 22
Re: Kingston SSDNow V-Series Notebook Upgrade Kit Review
Thanks. That's what matters to me. I own the 64GB version of this drive, and have done multiple things that I would think would induce stutter (downloading 5-6 torrents at 800kb/sec combined while watching xvid video, or unrarring 700mb files while surfing the web with 5-6 active tabs in firefox) and it just hasn't stuttered. If it does what I want it to, i don't care what a benchmark will tell me is wrong with the drive. It's not about ignorance, it's about the drive not disappointing. And I love how the laptop is now silent as opposed to having the 7200.3 drive inside.
-
4th July 2009, 03:34 AM #29Banned
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Posts
- 7,251
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: Kingston SSDNow V-Series Notebook Upgrade Kit Review
HM ive been looking at a 64GB SSD myself, Possibly just to keep the OS on. But this has me intrigued i have 2 HDD slots an am only using one i dont think it would be too bad to add this drive.
-
4th July 2009, 11:56 AM #30
Re: Kingston SSDNow V-Series Notebook Upgrade Kit Review
Kingston 138.99, OCZ vertex is 199.99. I'd probably spend the little bit extra and get the vertex. You could also get a samsung drive for under 200.
Current Laptop/Hardware Reviews, News, and Information--Asus 1002HA Review
Computer Tech Links
Lenovo T61p t8300/Nvidia Quadro 570m/3gb ram/ Hitachi 7k320/Vista Home Premium
Asus 1002HA 1.6ghz Atom/Hitachi 7k200/1gb Ram/WinXP



LinkBack URL







2013 Alienware Notebooks revealed
11th June 2013, 12:46 PM in Alienware