Quantcast Mint: XFCE vs LMDE

Closed Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Notebook Geek
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    96
    Rep Power
    13

    Default Mint: XFCE vs LMDE

    I was just curious how these distros are/how they compare. From my understanding, XFCE is more lightweight, while LMDE uses gnome. Is this true? Any other differences? Anybody run either of these and can share an opinion?

    Thanks.
    Previous: HP dv5000 | AMD Turion ML-34 | 768MB RAM | 80GB HDD |
    Current: HP dv6t Select Edition | i5-540M | 6GB RAM | 500GB HDD | ATI HD5650/Intel Integrated |

  2. #2
    Notebook Geek
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    /root
    Posts
    82
    Rep Power
    13

    Default Re: Mint: XFCE vs LMDE

    The new Linux Mint XFCE release is now based on LMDE. So, basically it's LMDE - Gnome + XFCE .

    XFCE is lighter than Gnome but, like Gnome, is based on the same GTK libraries. In other words, your applications will look native whether you use Gnome or XFCE. Both are stable desktop environments. It just comes down to which one you prefer.

  3. #3
    Notebook Geek
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    96
    Rep Power
    13

    Default Re: Mint: XFCE vs LMDE

    Can you give me a shortlist of the pros and cons of each? I'm not all that familiar with how they differ so I don't really have a preference.
    Previous: HP dv5000 | AMD Turion ML-34 | 768MB RAM | 80GB HDD |
    Current: HP dv6t Select Edition | i5-540M | 6GB RAM | 500GB HDD | ATI HD5650/Intel Integrated |

  4. #4
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Kanto
    Posts
    257
    Rep Power
    12

    Default Re: Mint: XFCE vs LMDE

    All of the pros and cons will deal with the DE.

    There isn't a whole lot of straight pros and cons for the DE's either. Try one and see how you like it. I like XFCE more then GNOME myself.
    My signature is the best!

  5. #5
    Notebook Geek
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    /root
    Posts
    82
    Rep Power
    13

    Default Re: Mint: XFCE vs LMDE

    Like lupusarcanus said, you can't really compare DE's unless one is lacking severely in functionality, for example. The only differences between DE's are pretty much the default set of applications and how you interact with it.

    The new XFCE 4.8 release is a huge improvement over the older XFCE 4.6 release. I'm not sure if Linux Mint XFCE includes version 4.8. XFCE is, by design, very customizable. That doesn't mean it's hard to use, though. XFCE is really straight forward while letting you change it to suit your needs.

    Gnome's 2.xx releases were also very customizable, but with their new 3.0 release, they're aiming at new users and oversimplified things as a result (in my opinion). Many people complain about how little Gnome 3.0 can be modified. LMDE is based on Debian Squeeze, which contains the last Gnome 2.xx release, 2.32, and will probably continue to do so until the next Debian release.

    You should download both of the DVD's and try them out for yourself. I live CD session is worth more than 1000 words . I personally use both XFCE 4.8 and Gnome 2.32, but I'm switching to only XFCE 4.8 because of the direction Gnome is heading.

  6. #6
    Notebook Deity
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,767
    Rep Power
    23

    Default Re: Mint: XFCE vs LMDE

    Quote Originally Posted by chenxiaolong View Post
    Like lupusarcanus said, you can't really compare DE's unless one is lacking severely in functionality, for example. The only differences between DE's are pretty much the default set of applications and how you interact with it.

    The new XFCE 4.8 release is a huge improvement over the older XFCE 4.6 release. I'm not sure if Linux Mint XFCE includes version 4.8. XFCE is, by design, very customizable. That doesn't mean it's hard to use, though. XFCE is really straight forward while letting you change it to suit your needs.

    Gnome's 2.xx releases were also very customizable, but with their new 3.0 release, they're aiming at new users and oversimplified things as a result (in my opinion). Many people complain about how little Gnome 3.0 can be modified. LMDE is based on Debian Squeeze, which contains the last Gnome 2.xx release, 2.32, and will probably continue to do so until the next Debian release.

    You should download both of the DVD's and try them out for yourself. I live CD session is worth more than 1000 words . I personally use both XFCE 4.8 and Gnome 2.32, but I'm switching to only XFCE 4.8 because of the direction Gnome is heading.
    Same. I have been using Debian Squeeze + XFCE 4.8 for about 2 weeks now, and their are few bugs but overall it is much better than it was previously.

    Xubuntu + XFCE 4.8 is so fast on my notebook, plus I love the fact Thunar is the default file manager -- IMO better than Nautilus.

    I'm not sticking with Ubuntu or any distro that goes the route of Gnome3 or Unity. I have been looking at Xubuntu 11.04 and it looks GREAT. I think that's going to be my new main distro. I know the linux snobs frown upon Xubuntu but it really is a wonderful XFCE distro.
    Sager NP 8662|P8700|Nvidia 260GTX|4GB Ram| Windows 7 Ultimate x64/ #!Crunchbang Linux
    Acer Aspire One| C-50 + 6250| Fedora 17

    Desktop: | MSI 870-G45 | 4GB DDR3 | Galaxy 460 GTX 768 Mb | Win 7 Ultimate x64 |GhostBSD

  7. #7
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Kanto
    Posts
    257
    Rep Power
    12

    Default Re: Mint: XFCE vs LMDE

    Quote Originally Posted by Linus Torvalds
    I personally just encourage people to switch to KDE.

    This "users are idiots, and are confused by functionality" mentality of Gnome is a disease. If you think your users are idiots, only idiots will use it. I don't use Gnome, because in striving to be simple, it has long since reached the point where it simply doesn't do what I need it to do.

    Please, just tell people to use KDE.
    Source.

    I said nothing!
    (I actually prefer XFCE, as I said before; but I was just emphasizing chenxiaolong's point.)
    Last edited by lupusarcanus; 22nd April 2011 at 11:13 PM. Reason: edited link to point to ORIGINAL source
    My signature is the best!

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    6,689
    Rep Power
    49

    Default Re: Mint: XFCE vs LMDE

    Point, counterpoint:
    Quote Originally Posted by Linus Torvalds
    I used to be a KDE user. I thought KDE 4.0 was such a disaster I switched to GNOME. I hate the fact that my right button doesn't do what I want it to do. But the whole "break everything" model is painful for users and they can choose to use something else.
    Open source identity: Linux founder Linus Torvalds

  9. #9
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Kanto
    Posts
    257
    Rep Power
    12

    Default Re: Mint: XFCE vs LMDE

    Ah, I never saw that. Well, all is even ground then. Thanks for that!

    I'll just stick with what I said in my first post.
    My signature is the best!

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:54 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2
Copyright © 2014 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1