Quantcast Arch Linux 2009.8 Vs Ubuntu 9.04

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
  1. #1
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    477
    Rep Power
    15

    Default Arch Linux 2009.8 Vs Ubuntu 9.04

    This is a great article to read. In the test I was curious about the gaming aspect but unfortunately they only did 1 game. World of Padman and Arch won by 5 more FPS overall. Here is the article and it's a good read.

    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...nchmarks&num=1

    I think on the reading and writing to the HD's its an unfair test due to Ubuntu using the older ext3 file format to the ext4 on Arch. When I did try to setup Arch, I stayed with ext3. All you Arch fans out there, you got a lead over me when it comes to gaming.


    Only if I have been able to install arch linux to try.
    Last edited by joeelmex; 14th August 2009 at 03:09 PM.

  2. #2
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Generally, away from the sun
    Posts
    155
    Rep Power
    12

    Default Re: Arch Linux 2009.8 Vs Ubuntu 9.04

    Hmm, I haven't used arch for a while, I might have to look into it.
    Thanks for the article.
    t3h l33tz!ll4
    X58 ATX mobo || i7-950(D0)oc3.8GHz || GTX 295oc 690/1487/1140 || 6GB DDR3 1600 || X25-M 80GB || 2500GB 7200RPM || Blu-ray/HD DVD || 1000W || Haf X || Windows 7 x64

    The Monster without a Name

  3. #3
    Notebook Acolyte
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Moscow, ID
    Posts
    6,830
    Rep Power
    44

    Default Re: Arch Linux 2009.8 Vs Ubuntu 9.04

    Lawlz... I don't need convincing. I'll switch at some point.
    Notebooks:
    Vostro 3555 | AMD E2-3000M 1.8Ghz | 4GB RAM | Radeon HD 6380 | 320GB HD | Win 7 | Xubuntu 12.04
    Vostro 1400 | T5470 C2D 1.6Ghz | 2GB RAM | 128MB nVidia GeForce 8400M | 320GB HD | Win XP Pro | Xubuntu 12.04
    Desktop:
    Gigabyte Mobo | PC Power & Cooling 610W | Intel C2Q Q6600 2.4GHz | Radeon HD 4850 512MB | Crucial 4GB | WD Blue 320GB 7200rpm | Acer 23" 1080p | Win 7 Pro
    Tumblr

  4. #4
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Central Valley, CA
    Posts
    647
    Rep Power
    14

    Default Re: Arch Linux 2009.8 Vs Ubuntu 9.04

    The latest arch package for nvidia is version 190.18
    Compal JHL90 from PowerNotebooks.com
    15.4" WSXGA+ (1680x1050) Glossy | Intel P8400 (2.26GHz/1066MHz/3MiB) w/AS5 | 4 GiB DDR2/800 | GeForce 9600M GT (512MiB) | Intel WiFi 5100 AGN & Bluetooth | 320 GiB Sata II 3Gb/s 5,400 RPM | Arch Linux AMD64
    This belongs to you.

  5. #5
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    477
    Rep Power
    15

    Default Re: Arch Linux 2009.8 Vs Ubuntu 9.04

    Well Archer, I could not enjoy the fruits of Arch Linux, I could never get the raid setup correctly. Sooner or later I get it. LoL

  6. #6
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Central Valley, CA
    Posts
    647
    Rep Power
    14

    Default Re: Arch Linux 2009.8 Vs Ubuntu 9.04

    Yeah, your setup is especially hard. I never had to deal with raid. My first go was with regular old primary partitions.
    Compal JHL90 from PowerNotebooks.com
    15.4" WSXGA+ (1680x1050) Glossy | Intel P8400 (2.26GHz/1066MHz/3MiB) w/AS5 | 4 GiB DDR2/800 | GeForce 9600M GT (512MiB) | Intel WiFi 5100 AGN & Bluetooth | 320 GiB Sata II 3Gb/s 5,400 RPM | Arch Linux AMD64
    This belongs to you.

  7. #7
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    320
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Re: Arch Linux 2009.8 Vs Ubuntu 9.04

    Quote Originally Posted by joeelmex View Post
    Well Archer, I could not enjoy the fruits of Arch Linux, I could never get the raid setup correctly. Sooner or later I get it. LoL
    Fake (software) raid or software (hardware) raid? I can setup my linux server in raid1 using fake raid with ease . However, software raid is confusing. I am still deciding which DE should I use or should I go hardcore using a *box system.

  8. #8
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    477
    Rep Power
    15

    Default Re: Arch Linux 2009.8 Vs Ubuntu 9.04

    I think Linux terms is fakeraid, its using the program DMRAID to make it work.

  9. #9
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    320
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Re: Arch Linux 2009.8 Vs Ubuntu 9.04

    Off-Topic: When you try to install fakeraid, where are you stuck on? You definitely need to load dm_mod and your chipset (if required). If you get a kernal panic after setting up a install, you may have to reinstall grub.

    Make sure you setup the raid in your bios before trying fakeraid. Good luck!

  10. #10
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    477
    Rep Power
    15

    Default Re: Arch Linux 2009.8 Vs Ubuntu 9.04

    To answer your question, hardware wise, it was setup by entering my intel raid utility at boot up and setup a striped raid 0 Volume. I was following this guide here

    "http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/...with_Fake-RAID"

    I got lost here
    ""Add your_chipset_module_driver and dm_mod to MODULES line in mkinitcpio.conf. IMPORTANT: if you have a mirrored (RAID 1) array, you'll need to add dm_mirror as well.
    Add dmraid to HOOKS line in mkinitcpio.conf, preferably after sata but before filesystems.
    Exit menu and make sure dmraid is one of the hooks.
    "

    Had no idea what exactly was my chipset, but I did manage to setup the partitions, and set the file systems as ext 3 on my root and home partition. I made the root partition as the boot was was planning on setting grub there. I never got to the gub part, i left off in the configuration part.

 

 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:02 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0