Quantcast ThinkPad X1, X230, X230t, T430, T430s, T530, W530, L430, L530 Official - Page 15

+ Reply to Thread
Page 15 of 111 FirstFirst ... 51112131415161718192565 ... LastLast
Results 141 to 150 of 1106
  1. #141
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    114
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    5400 vs 5200 vs 4200 nvidia spec sheet comparison
    http://www.nvidia.com/object/nvs_techspecs.html

    Apologies, didnt realise it got posted already
    lenovo ThinkPad X220
    Core i5 | 8GB | 256GB Samsung 840 Pro SSD | IPS | Win 8 Pro x64
    eGPU: PE4L V2.1b | GTX 660 Ti | Xbox 360 175W PSU Mod

  2. #142
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    389
    Rep Power
    13

    Default Re: ThinkPad X1, X230, X230t, T430, T430s, T530, W530, L430, L530 Official

    GTX 660M
    384 CUDA Cores
    835 MHzGraphics Clock (MHz)
    30.4Texture Fill Rate (billion/sec)
    Memory Specs:
    2000Memory Clock
    GDDR5Memory Interface
    128bitMemory Interface Width
    64.0

    NVS 5400M
    96 CUDA Cores
    Graphic Clock Up to 660
    Processor Clock Up to 1329
    Memory Amount Up to 2 GB
    Memory Interface 128 bit

    Well...no comparison. Looks like gaming is still out of the question for the next T series line. I am not too surprise though.
    Thinkpad T500// T9900, 8gb (4x4)DDR3 1066, Momentus XT 500hybrid, HD3650 256MB, 16:10 1680x1050 CCFL

  3. #143
    Newbie
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: ThinkPad X1, X230, X230t, T430, T430s, T530, W530, L430, L530 Official

    The NVS 5400M is basically on-par with the nVidia Fermi GT 630M as far as overall performance goes. It is definitely better than the previous NVS 4200, but not many orders of magnitude more powerful -- a little under twice as fast at some tasks, basically a direct modern replacement for what the T420 had. Enough to run a game like Battlefield 3 on Low @ native resolution at around 40 FPS.

    3DMark 11 Compare:
    NVS 4200 (T420): ~518
    GT 630M (Equiv. to T430): ~942
    Intel HD 4000 (New Intel Integrated): ~620

    So much better than the T420, but still far away from something like the GT 650M (in the new Alienware M14X and rumored Macbook Pros) that scores 2078 on 3DMark 11.
    Last edited by danielsjt; 16th May 2012 at 07:19 PM. Reason: 630M is not a Kepler part, is a Fermi part, adjusted first line.

  4. #144
    Overthinking? Always!
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    São Paulo, Brazil
    Posts
    7,649
    Rep Power
    41

    Default Re: ThinkPad X1, X230, X230t, T430, T430s, T530, W530, L430, L530 Official

    Quote Originally Posted by danielsjt View Post
    The NVS 5400M is basically on-par with the nVidia Keplar GT 630M as far as overall performance goes. It is definitely better than the previous NVS 4200, but not many orders of magnitude more powerful -- a little under twice as fast at some tasks, basically a direct modern replacement for what the T420 had. Enough to run a game like Battlefield 3 on Low @ native resolution at around 40 FPS.

    3DMark 11 Compare:
    NVS 4200 (T420): ~518
    GT 630M (Equiv. to T430): ~942
    Intel HD 4000 (New Intel Integrated): ~620

    So much better than the T420, but still far away from something like the GT 650M (in the new Alienware M14X and rumored Macbook Pros) that scores 2078 on 3DMark 11.
    there is no kepler 630m, the kepler line starts at the 640m and only in some models.

    the 640m/650m/660m are the same card, with performance increase due to the choice of DDR3 or GDDR5 and the speed of the clocks.

    It makes no sense for nvidia to release a low end quadro card with kepler, fermi was much more heavy on gpgpu, kepler is a fail in that area.

    Sincerely the T and probably W line are faded to have a new keyboard and a new cpu, with the needed chipset to boot.

  5. #145
    Newbie
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: ThinkPad X1, X230, X230t, T430, T430s, T530, W530, L430, L530 Official

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr MM View Post
    there is no kepler 630m, the kepler line starts at the 640m and only in some models.

    the 640m/650m/660m are the same card, with performance increase due to the choice of DDR3 or GDDR5 and the speed of the clocks.

    It makes no sense for nvidia to release a low end quadro card with kepler, fermi was much more heavy on gpgpu, kepler is a fail in that area.

    Sincerely the T and probably W line are faded to have a new keyboard and a new cpu, with the needed chipset to boot.
    Sorry about that, does look like the 630M is a Fermi part. Either way, CUDA cores, memory interface, and clocks between the 630M and the NVS 5400M are pretty well on-par, so performance numbers should be somewhat comparable.

  6. #146
    Overthinking? Always!
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    São Paulo, Brazil
    Posts
    7,649
    Rep Power
    41

    Default Re: ThinkPad X1, X230, X230t, T430, T430s, T530, W530, L430, L530 Official

    they should be, nvidia just renamed the chips to quadro and launched a driver with more features in line for what pro needs.

    no need to be sorry though.

  7. #147
    Notebook Geek
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    76
    Rep Power
    14

    Default

    Regarding the possibility of being stuck with fermi based Quadros for the w530s.

    Wasn't there meant to be a 28nm fermi based 600 series gpu? Hopefully they base the newer Quadros on such a part and we get the best of both worlds... i.e. Gpgpu and efficiency.

  8. #148
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    154
    Rep Power
    10

    Default Re: ThinkPad X1, X230, X230t, T430, T430s, T530, W530, L430, L530 Official

    Some more information available on anandtech

    AnandTech - Lenovo Announces Their 3rd Generation Intel Core Laptop Updates

    The X1 carbon indeed appears to have a keyboard with a slightly different layout in the function buttons. I wonder where they get the extra room.

    They made the L series resemble the T series a bit more, at least for the computing surface. But the L430 is unreasonably large; look at that bezel!

    Anandtech says the T430s gets the 5400m with 128 bit memory, so not the 5200m which is positive.

    Quadro K1000 and K2000 for the W530 means kepler?

    ugh that keyboard layout is very disappointing
    Thinkpad T400 with P8600, WXGA+ CCFL, HD3470 switchable, 8 GB, 240 GB, and Windows 7 64

  9. #149
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    YellowBrickRd.AU
    Posts
    7,931
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: ThinkPad X1, X230, X230t, T430, T430s, T530, W530, L430, L530 Official

    Quote Originally Posted by wild05kid05 View Post
    Only T430s(lim) gets Thunderbolt
    Wish Lenovo made their Thinkpads come with a standard expresscard slot (x1 2.0) that could double up as a Thunderbolt port. Ie: insert a card with a Thunderbolt controller that gives a Thunderbolt port. To do that would require them to route the x4 3.0 north bridge pins there and somehow provide an insert to plug into those pins. Could be tricky but Lenovo could surely sort something out.

    Such modularity would mean third parties could make a custom x4 3.0 connector and an eGPU enclosure to tap such an interface. That way could bypass Thunderbolt altogether if MSI/Intel/Apple want to delay it indefinitely to safeguard desktop/gaming notebook sales.

  10. #150
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    541
    Rep Power
    6

    Default Re: ThinkPad X1, X230, X230t, T430, T430s, T530, W530, L430, L530 Official

    The new L-Series is much better than last year series:
    - HD+ Display for the L430 too
    - Classic ThinkPad 180° Opening Hinges
    - nVidia Optimus Option
    - Backlight Option (it hadn´t ThinkLight before)
    - Thinner and lighter
    - Same Keyboards as T-Series
    etc.

    They will also retain the 54mm Expresscard-Slot.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:12 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0