Quantcast i5 450 -VS- i5 520? - Page 11

Closed Thread
Page 11 of 12 FirstFirst ... 789101112 LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 115
  1. #101
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    558
    Rep Power
    10

    Default Re: i5 450 -VS- i5 520?

    As said just above me, there can't be any test or review to back up what I was saying. Because even without smartcache there is no significant performance difference. That's the reason no one bothers testing smart cache vs no smart cache, another reason is because all cpus since c2d do have shared cache on the die. If you look at reviews of the whole arrandale line architecture, the cache is in a neutral position.
    I said before hypotetically that it could be an improved version of shared cache, but now ark is updated you see it's just a typo, even pure marketing argument.

  2. #102
    Biiiiiiirrrrdmaaaaaaan
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    4,297
    Rep Power
    28

    Default Re: i5 450 -VS- i5 520?

    in other news. I gots no clue how to make setFSB like the cpu.


    in the freeware version the first three or four can getFSB but if you set it, it either doesn't change things or crashes the computer so badly you can't turn it off with the power button. I had to pull out the battery (and also swore off getFSB. let someone else do that crap)
    Envy 14

    i5-520m | HD 5650 | 14.5" 1600x900 | 320GB HDD | 2x2GB DDR3 | Win7HP x64

  3. #103
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    558
    Rep Power
    10

    Default Re: i5 450 -VS- i5 520?

    Thats because the setfsb developper guy needs you to contact him to provide the clockgen chip model that is on the envy motherboard. I don't know where is located the clockgen chip, but if you sent him HD pictures of the envy motherboard with all chips name readable he would find it, set up in the program the right clockgen, and add envy 14 support in the next version of his setfsb.
    That said never try a random clockgen on set FSB, it can cause scary problems : P

  4. #104
    Notebook Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    34
    Rep Power
    7

    Default Re: i5 450 -VS- i5 520?

    What about between the 450 and 540?

  5. #105
    Biiiiiiirrrrdmaaaaaaan
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    4,297
    Rep Power
    28

    Default Re: i5 450 -VS- i5 520?

    540 is obviously better.

    partly since it's clocked higher by default (2.53 Ghz base speed)
    Envy 14

    i5-520m | HD 5650 | 14.5" 1600x900 | 320GB HDD | 2x2GB DDR3 | Win7HP x64

  6. #106
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    173
    Rep Power
    10

    Default Re: i5 450 -VS- i5 520?

    too bad it is not an option...
    Ordered: HP DV6T Quad | ATI 6770m 2GB | Core i7-2720 | 2 x 4GB DDR3 | 750GB 5400rpm | 1080p

    Returned: HP Envy14 | ATI 5650 Switchable | Core i5-520m | 2GB x 2 DDR3 | 160GB SSD | Radiance Display

    Donated: Dell 600m | ATI Radeon Mobility 9000m | Pentium M 1.8GHz | 2GB RAM.

  7. #107
    Notebook Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Silicon Valley
    Posts
    49
    Rep Power
    7

    Default Re: i5 450 -VS- i5 520?

    @ OP
    i5-450M Actually has VT but not VT for IO. You are still good with running some VMs with the 450M just the virtual IO transfer (virtual devices) will be slower compared to 520M.

    Compare Intel® Products,

    Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology Yes Yes
    Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) Yes
    Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) No
    Intel® Trusted Execution Technology No
    AES New Instructions No

    - Acer TimelineX 3820T 13.3" | i3-350M | Intel HD Graphics
    - Acer TimelineX 4820TG 14" | i5-450M | ATI HD 5650 | Seagate Momentus XT
    - Asus Eee 1000 10.1" | Atom N270 | SSD Runcore | Touch Screen | Crucial Ram
    - Acer Aspire 5020 15.6" | AMD Turion x64 ML-28 | ATI Radeon Mobility X700

  8. #108
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    122
    Rep Power
    10

    Default Re: i5 450 -VS- i5 520?

    sif the 450 doesn't have VT?

  9. #109
    Tyo
    Tyo is offline
    Notebook Deity
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Milton, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,163
    Rep Power
    17

    Default Re: i5 450 -VS- i5 520?

    how's 450 for gaming, like sc2 and fps games ? strong enough or it will be slowin things down ?
    HP dv3t | C2D-P8600 | 320GB HDD | G105M | 13'' WXGA | 4GB DDR2 RAM
    Asus N71JQ | i7 720QM | 640GB HDD|ATI 5730 | 17'' 900p | 4GB DDR3 RAM
    Desktop | EVGA 670 FTW | Sabertooth z77| I5-3570k | Crucial 256 SSD | Corsair AX850 | Asus 24'' 120MHZ |

  10. #110
    Notebook Prophet
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    4,491
    Rep Power
    30

    Default Re: i5 450 -VS- i5 520?

    Quote Originally Posted by sumik View Post
    how's 450 for gaming, like sc2 and fps games ? strong enough or it will be slowin things down ?
    Should be fine. Most users in the E14 thread say it's the GPU that's giving them problems. Mainly cuz its ATI and its usual problems. Easily solvable by capping the fps and updating drivers though. Also turning off powerplay works for folks in GX640 thread.

    GOod lucky
    m17xr3 with i7-2720qm and ATI 6970m
    $200 cooling mod http://forum.notebookreview.com/7616798-post11.html

 

 
Page 11 of 12 FirstFirst ... 789101112 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:00 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0