Quantcast AMD Turion X2 vs. Intel Core 2 Duo

Closed Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    215
    Rep Power
    20

    Default AMD Turion X2 vs. Intel Core 2 Duo

    I know Intel has a faster processor and AMD is a slightly better power saver but what other factors come into play?

  2. #2
    Notebook Nobel Laureate
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Kepler-22b
    Posts
    7,193
    Rep Power
    52

    Default Re: AMD Turion X2 vs. Intel Core 2 Duo

    The Intel Core 2 Duo at the moment is better, it saves a bit more power, is more efficient and performs better.
    Sony Vaio S13 - i5-3210M - 6GB - 750GB - Win 8

  3. #3
    The Random Guy
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,720
    Rep Power
    31

    Default Re: AMD Turion X2 vs. Intel Core 2 Duo

    Thats probably about it. Power and performance are the main focus of mobile processors. Intel has a very good processor, with it able to consume very little power and still running very fast when it needs to. AMD also have a very good processor, but their main advantage is the price. Generally, they tend to be less.

    Performance wise, the Intel will perform slightly faster as you have said, but that is not to say the AMD isn't good. The Intel will also be slighly better power wise. The architecture of the Core 2 Duo is more efficient than the Turion X2, and so, it will decrease the power consumption. However, it depends on the rest of the system. For example, the Intel could be paired with a very powerful graphics card, that would use a lot of power and thus, reduce the overall battery life.
    FSC Amilo XI 1546

    Intel Core Duo T2400
    2 GB DDR2 Corsair RAM
    ATI Mobility X1800
    17" WXGA+ CrystalView Display
    500GB Hitachi GST 7K500 + 100GB Hitachi GST 7K200
    Windows 7 Professional
    External Display: LG 24" LCD 1920x1080 HAS

  4. #4
    Slobbers on subnotebooks
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX, USA
    Posts
    6,213
    Rep Power
    49

    Default Re: AMD Turion X2 vs. Intel Core 2 Duo

    In general, the C2D should be better in almost every aspect but will also cost more as well than the Turion. I'd recommend the C2D, excellent processor.
    Steam: nerdydesi

    HP DV6-6910US

  5. #5
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    5
    Rep Power
    23

    Default Re: AMD Turion X2 vs. Intel Core 2 Duo

    Kind of a followup question on this:

    Does the performance comparison apply to exectution of 64 bit code? Is the Core 2 a better performer with that as well?

    (Also a confirmation - I've heard the Core Duo is 32 bit only while Core 2 Duo is both 32 and 64. Can anyone confirm that? Intel always seems a bit shy talking about 64 bit...)

  6. #6
    Comrade Santa
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    3,468
    Rep Power
    36

    Default Re: AMD Turion X2 vs. Intel Core 2 Duo

    I haven't seen more than one or two benchmarks of 64-bit performance, but what I've seen indicates that the performance gap is a lot smaller in 64-bit mode. The C2D is still faster, but it no longer slaughters the Turion/Athlon64.

    From what I've seen, C2D performs about the same in 32 and 64 bit mode, while Athlon 64 is faster in 64 than 32.

    And yeah, you're right, Core is 32 bit only. Core 2 is 64 bit as well.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:01 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2
Copyright © 2014 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1