Quantcast 2MB Cache Vs. 4MB Cache

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
  1. #1
    Notebook Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    11
    Rep Power
    19

    Default 2MB Cache Vs. 4MB Cache

    Hey, I'm sorry if this question sounds really stupid or if its been answered before. I know its been touched on in the forums already but I swear I've combed them trying to find an answer and tried google searching it and am still really confused.

    What exactly is the difference between a 2MB cache and a 4MB cache? I am currently buying a T60 laptop and the only two processor options offered are a T5500 and T7200. Upgrading to the T7200 results in nearly a $150 price increase which is kind of steep for me.

    I'm not really concerned about the speed of either processor. I see that everyone is in agreement that there is only a modest speed increase at best for most applications. The divisons on either processor just stem from the the idea on whether or not this speed increase is worth it (which is of course, oppinion). What I AM concerned about though is whether both are 64-bit processors or not. I've seen some people say that the 4MB cache is what makes it 64-bit and other people say that just having a Core 2 Duo in general is 64-bit. These are two totally contradictory statements and I am wondering if anyone would be able to help me.

    Plus, I notice on the intel site that only the T5500 Cored 2 Duo lacks the ability to have "Intel Virtualization Technology". What the heck is that? Would I need that?

    Thank you for all of your help.

  2. #2
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    384
    Rep Power
    20

    Default Re: 2MB Cache Vs. 4MB Cache

    No idea on the Virtualization, but Core 2 Duo is 64-bit, period. The t5500 and t5600 are both 64-bit even though they have the 2mb cache.

    By the way, it is in NO way worth the upgrade for a whopping $150. I personally wouldn't spend any more than $50 on that upgrade, or I wouldn't get it.
    I don't know what to put here.

  3. #3
    402
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Northern Virgina/Virginia Tech
    Posts
    3,401
    Rep Power
    34

    Default Re: 2MB Cache Vs. 4MB Cache

    Both are 64-bit as stevenator128 said.

    The difference between cache sizes is that the more cache you have, the faster math and other things can be done. Cache stores the most frequently used instructions to save time. In everyday work, there will be no noticeable difference. If you are doing a lot of number crunching, the extra cache might come into play.

    If you don't know what virtualization is, don't worry about it as it will not affect you.
    IBM Thinkpad T60

    4.16.07
    Quit PMing me with questions! Post in the forums!

  4. #4
    Notebook Geek
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    93
    Rep Power
    19

    Default Re: 2MB Cache Vs. 4MB Cache


  5. #5
    Comrade Santa
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    3,468
    Rep Power
    34

    Default Re: 2MB Cache Vs. 4MB Cache

    Cache size has nothing to do with features. It's just how big a buffer it has on the chip to cache data, so it doesn't have to wait for the RAM to catch up. So more cache provides a modest performance boost, and nothing else.

  6. #6
    Hall Monitor
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    5,504
    Rep Power
    42

    Default Re: 2MB Cache Vs. 4MB Cache

    If the $150 is a lot to spend on an upgrade, I assure you that you'll be fine the the T5500. It's a very powerful CPU. Chances are you wouldn't notice the difference or even need the extra processing power anyway.
    COMPAL HEL80 (PowerPro L 8:15)
    WSXGA+ l Go 7600 l T2500 l AS5 l 2 GB l 100GB 7,200 RPM l Bluetooth

    Finding the Right Notebook l Notebook Battery Guide

  7. #7
    Notebook Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    11
    Rep Power
    19

    Default Re: 2MB Cache Vs. 4MB Cache

    Thank you for all of your help everyone. I really appreciate you all clearing up what a 2MB cache and a 4MB cache are and what constitutes a 64-bit processor.

    But no one can tell me what "Intel Virtualization Technology" is? I don't like the answer that if I don't know what it is, I shouldn't worry about it. After all, there are lots of things that I don't know; but just because I don't know them doesn't mean they aren't useful or important.

  8. #8
    Notebook Nobel Laureate
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Charleston, WV
    Posts
    7,143
    Rep Power
    52

    Default Re: 2MB Cache Vs. 4MB Cache

    Quote Originally Posted by CptProletariat View Post
    But no one can tell me what "Intel Virtualization Technology" is? I don't like the answer that if I don't know what it is, I shouldn't worry about it. After all, there are lots of things that I don't know; but just because I don't know them doesn't mean they aren't useful or important.
    It is basically hardware support for people who want to run 2 operating systems virtually using software such as vmware or Virtual PC without the need to partition or dual boot the hard drive. It helps out people who want to test new OS/applications without having to go through all the trouble. It is mostly aimed at Professionals & business users, for the home user it is of little use unless you want to try out different OS virtually.
    Last edited by miner; 21st October 2006 at 11:36 AM.
    Lenovo Thinkpad T400 Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, ATi HD3470/Intel GMA X4500, 160GB Intel 320 SSD/320GB Fujitsu MHZ2320BH G2 5400rpm HDD, 4GB DDR3 1066, 14.1" WXGA+ CCFL, Windows 8 Pro x64
    HP Pavilion DM1-3000 AMD E350, AMD HD6310, 320GB Seagate Momentus 7200rpm HDD, 3GB DDR3 1066, 11.6" WXGA LED, Mint 14

  9. #9
    Comrade Santa
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    3,468
    Rep Power
    34

    Default Re: 2MB Cache Vs. 4MB Cache

    It's true, if you don't know what it is, you shouldn't worry about it.

    As said above, it allows you to run multiple OS'es simultaneously, without having to fall back to software emulation.

  10. #10
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    20 miles north of Binghamton, NY
    Posts
    162
    Rep Power
    20

    Default Any benefit of std "Intel Virtualization Technology (IVT)" with Digital Video Editing programs, or way to obtain better rendering?

    How much % benefit does it provide if running VMware? Can only one O/S be virtual? If trying out Multiple GNU/Linux bundles w/ M$ XP pro (dual or #x Boot), would it better 2 have the Windoz O/S virtual?
    Quote Originally Posted by miner View Post
    SNPD/edtd basically hardware support to run 2 operating systems virtually using software such as vmware or Virtual PC without the need to partition or dual boot the hard drive. It helps out people who want to test new OS/applications without having to go through all the trouble. aimed at Professionals & business users, for the home user it is of little use unless you want to try out different OS virtually.
    Would IVT provide any benefit when rendering in Digital Video editing?? Adobe Premiere or Final Cut PRO.
    Appears a larger cache 4MB would make a big difference to render DVE.
    Link to My Hardware courtesy of DynaSig!
    Still NEED a 71A HDD housing kit & OD bay CADDY

    A cheaper LCD, than original Z71Vp (128/WSXGA+), on Z71V (WXGA/now128mb) but better Asus case!

    DUAL {or #x} BOOT: FC5, KubuntuLTS, xpPRO, Slackware 11
    Accept all parts & advice ?ICRH6 RAID possible?

 

 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:24 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2
Copyright © 2014 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1