Quantcast i7-4700MQ (47 Watt) vs i7-4702MQ (37 Watt)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32
Like Tree2Likes

Thread: i7-4700MQ (47 Watt) vs i7-4702MQ (37 Watt)

  1. #1
    Notebook Deity
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,154
    Rep Power
    18

    Default i7-4700MQ (47 Watt) vs i7-4702MQ (37 Watt)

    Wondering about what would be actually better to get out of these two processors the i7-4700MQ (47 Watt) or the i7-4702MQ (37 Watt)?

    Taking into account the i7-4702MQ drops 200 MHz but is 10 Watt less than a i7-4700MQ should be pretty significant gain to battery life. Not only that should make for cooler running system.

    Although when I look at notebookcheck in their review, the i7-4702MQ thermal throttles due to the low TDP where as the i7-4700MQ does not and can stretch its legs. Then again the i7-4700MQ is in a test/review laptop with some pretty beefy cooling. The majority of notebooks will have pretty standard cooling in most consumer units. Therefore the i7-4700MQ may thermal throttle in most notebooks out there under load.

    http://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-...s.93189.0.html

    Alienware M17x R3
    MacBook Pro Retina 15

  2. #2
    Wisdom listens quietly...
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    9,000
    Rep Power
    52

    Default Re: i7-4700MQ (47 Watt) vs i7-4702MQ (37 Watt)

    From what we've seen from SNB and IB, the idle power (and heat output) is so close to call it the same from the highest quad cores, to the entry level dual cores (not the ULV's of course) when running idle/light/normal workloads.

    Haswell will be the same within the Haswell lineup (and much better at idle than SNB and IB...).


    Given the above, what is your intended usage (normal/light usage?... or heavy/intense?) - with either scenario if you'll be 'plugged in' for the heavy stuff, I would get the 4700MQ. Again; with either scenario, I would be getting a chassis that is built properly for a high performance quad core. This will ensure that with either processor you choose, you will be able to use it fully and with no artificial throttling.


    So this means forget about the super sexy .5" (~12mm) notebooks - bigger in this case, is better (when performance, and hence, proper cooling matters).


    And yes; that 200MHz does make a difference - 9% is a generational improvement (and you can have it now and enjoy it for the life of the system).


    ...

  3. #3
    Notebook Deity
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,154
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Re: i7-4700MQ (47 Watt) vs i7-4702MQ (37 Watt)

    Yeah they are pretty much the same around idle, seems to be a limit where no more power can be saved, or minimal wattage at ~800 MHz.

    I was expecting Haswell to have a much lower idle. Will be good if someone could post like a throttlestop screenshot (or the likes that shows power usage) of a Haswell mobile at idle.

    I going to use it for gaming on the couch at nights, (also want it for the touchscreen, but that really has nothing to do with the load). Bit worried about a 47 Watt quad working with a 750M gaming. It will be this year Envy 15 which is really this just a 2013 dv6, therefore I am expecting the usual slightly ok cooling system that usually end up high temps and in and out of throttling.

    Thinking about it I could use something like throttlestop to reduce the clock speed to that of a i7-4702MQ, thus use less power (which has worked with an earlier dv6 I had to stop it for over heatings). Though that will defect the purpose of having a faster CPU.

    There is a small premium to pay for the i7-4700MQ over the i7-4702MQ, keeps me thinking there must be some value in it?

    Alienware M17x R3
    MacBook Pro Retina 15

  4. #4
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    230
    Rep Power
    4

    Default Re: i7-4700MQ (47 Watt) vs i7-4702MQ (37 Watt)

    Quote Originally Posted by T2050 View Post
    Yeah they are pretty much the same around idle, seems to be a limit where no more power can be saved, or minimal wattage at ~800 MHz.

    I was expecting Haswell to have a much lower idle. Will be good if someone could post like a throttlestop screenshot (or the likes that shows power usage) of a Haswell mobile at idle.

    I going to use it for gaming on the couch at nights, (also want it for the touchscreen, but that really has nothing to do with the load). Bit worried about a 47 Watt quad working with a 750M gaming. It will be this year Envy 15 which is really this just a 2013 dv6, therefore I am expecting the usual slightly ok cooling system that usually end up high temps and in and out of throttling.

    Thinking about it I could use something like throttlestop to reduce the clock speed to that of a i7-4702MQ, thus use less power (which has worked with an earlier dv6 I had to stop it for over heatings). Though that will defect the purpose of having a faster CPU.

    There is a small premium to pay for the i7-4700MQ over the i7-4702MQ, keeps me thinking there must be some value in it?
    Wondering the same thing .

  5. #5
    Sacred Blame
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Terca Lumireis
    Posts
    8,950
    Rep Power
    52

    Default Re: i7-4700MQ (47 Watt) vs i7-4702MQ (37 Watt)

    Quote Originally Posted by Maikky View Post
    Wondering the same thing .
    Faster clock speeds, it's also possible the 4702MQ might be missing features like V-Pro and VT-x or have a different IGP, you could look up the spec sheets on ark.intel. Intel has also been know to charge quite a bit for a small bump in clock speeds.
    Current: Precision M6700¦3720qm¦2x240GB SSD + 256GB mSATA¦32GB DDR3 1600MHz¦Firepro M6000
    Previous: Asus G73Jh-A2¦920xm¦160GB G3 + 7K750¦Chastity vBios¦ICD7 + 0.5mm pads¦Intel 6300
    Secondary: Elitebook 2760p¦2410m¦250GB SSD¦8 GB DDR3¦HD 3000

  6. #6
    Overthinking? Always!
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    São Paulo, Brazil
    Posts
    9,372
    Rep Power
    52

    Default Re: i7-4700MQ (47 Watt) vs i7-4702MQ (37 Watt)

    Quote Originally Posted by tijo View Post
    Faster clock speeds, it's also possible the 4702MQ might be missing features like V-Pro and VT-x or have a different IGP, you could look up the spec sheets on ark.intel. Intel has also been know to charge quite a bit for a small bump in clock speeds.
    they are the same cpus, the 4700 is the 3600 OEM cpus

  7. #7
    Old School
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Arcade
    Posts
    30,673
    Rep Power
    159

    Default Re: i7-4700MQ (47 Watt) vs i7-4702MQ (37 Watt)

    Quote Originally Posted by T2050 View Post
    There is a small premium to pay for the i7-4700MQ over the i7-4702MQ, keeps me thinking there must be some value in it?
    It's kind of like the Ivy Bridge i7-3610QM vs i7-3612QM, except the 3612QM demanded a significant premium over the 3610QM because it was a 35W quad core as opposed to a 45W.

    NEW! --> MSI GT72 with GTX 980m Review
    Latest Reviews: Blade 14 Performance | Aorus X7 | Sager: NP7338 W230SS 860m | NP9377 P375SM 880m SLI | NP8268 P150SM-A 880m | other Clevo : Other Reviews
    Sager NP7338 'Serenity': 13.3" 1080p IPS Matte - i7-4810MQ - GTX 860m - 16GB 1866 - 256GB Plextor M5M + 960GB M500 - Intel 7260 802.11AC - Win 8.1
    Toys: Vaio Pro 11 i5/4GB/128GB, LG G2, Acer V5-122p, WHS 2011, Asus T100 Z3775/64GB, Desktop SFF i5-3570k/GTX670

  8. #8
    Notebook Retailer
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Coventry, England.
    Posts
    24,726
    Rep Power
    127

    Default Re: i7-4700MQ (47 Watt) vs i7-4702MQ (37 Watt)

    In a highend notebook you can just lower the TDP to 37W anyway lol.
    Sales@PowerNotebooks.com | Phone: (US) 877-711-1777 - CALL US FOR NOTEBOOKREVIEW ACTIVE MEMBER DISCOUNTS

    Custom Built Sager, MSI, PowerPro, ASUS and Alienware Laptop computers, and Custom Built Crown Desktop Computers
    ResellerRatings.com Customer Satisfaction Rating =
    10/10 Better Business Bureau A+ Rated

  9. #9
    Notebook Deity
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    In a place called "Sexy"
    Posts
    1,073
    Rep Power
    19

    Default Re: i7-4700MQ (47 Watt) vs i7-4702MQ (37 Watt)

    According to notebookcheck review about Haswell cpus, the 4702HQ seems to actually really consume less than 47 watts parts. It seems to be more significant than on 3612qm. I'd go for a 4702HQ and deactivate turbo boost to get more or less a 27W TDP. But that's just me, i hate noise and heat.
    Asus N550JV : Mat 768p screen // I7 4700HQ // 750M // 8GB DDR3 1,35V // Intel Wireless-N 2230 // 128 GB Toshiba serie Q ssd // Up to 10 hours battery life (59Wh)

  10. #10
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    230
    Rep Power
    4

    Default Re: i7-4700MQ (47 Watt) vs i7-4702MQ (37 Watt)

    Quote Originally Posted by Kallogan View Post
    According to notebookcheck review about Haswell cpus, the 4702HQ seems to actually really consume less than 47 watts parts. It seems to be more significant than on 3612qm. I'd go for a 4702HQ and deactivate turbo boost to get more or less a 27W TDP. But that's just me, i hate noise and heat.
    How easy is it to switch between throttling down when I'm just surfing and throttling back up when I need speed ? Throttling down will see a significant increase in battery life right ?

 

 
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:37 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2
Copyright © 2014 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1