+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 59
-
29th April 2012, 04:30 PM #1Notebook Consultant
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
- u.s.
- Posts
- 257
- Rep Power
- 10
Intel HD Graphics 4000 is as good as a 48 shader Nvidia card?
According to various benchmarks and some games it gets the same performance as my 240m. So Intel shaders are extremely efficient? 16 = 48, if it had as many shaders as a GTX 680 it would get 14,000 in 3dmark11, and yes I understand that it would be impossible to stick that many shaders on a cpu but they could just make it a dual cpu socket motherboard and make one cpu a insanely powerful gpu.
Intel HD Graphics 4000 - Notebookcheck.net Tech
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M - Notebookcheck.net Tech
The N51VN-A1:
T9600|GT 240m@330m|4GB DDR2|64GB + 320GB@7200 / 22"@1080p
3Dmark06 6224
Pcmark Vantage 6674
3Dmark Vantage P2498
Next Notebook:
8+ cores at 4+ GHZ | 5120+ shader ATI GPU | Quad SSD's. 3Dmark11E ~12000 PCMark 7D ~14000 Crysis 3.5 at 61fps
(unless the cloud destroys the PC market)
-
29th April 2012, 04:31 PM #2
Re: Intel HD Graphics 4000 is as good as a 48 shader Nvidia card?
That's Ivy Bridge for you.
That means it can run Skyrim at medium o.o because my 9400M can run it at medium 1280x800Old laptop: MacBook (Late 2009) Core 2 Duo 2.2 GHz, 2GB DDR3 1066 MHz Ram, GeForce 9400M
Current: (5/30) P150EM, i7-3610QM, 8GB DDR3 1333MHz RAM, AMD 7970M, Matte Screen, 750GB 7200RPM HDD

P150EM w/ 7970M Review!
-
29th April 2012, 04:38 PM #3Notebook Consultant
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
- u.s.
- Posts
- 257
- Rep Power
- 10
Re: Intel HD Graphics 4000 is as good as a 48 shader Nvidia card?
The N51VN-A1:
T9600|GT 240m@330m|4GB DDR2|64GB + 320GB@7200 / 22"@1080p
3Dmark06 6224
Pcmark Vantage 6674
3Dmark Vantage P2498
Next Notebook:
8+ cores at 4+ GHZ | 5120+ shader ATI GPU | Quad SSD's. 3Dmark11E ~12000 PCMark 7D ~14000 Crysis 3.5 at 61fps
(unless the cloud destroys the PC market)
-
29th April 2012, 06:51 PM #4Notebook Deity
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Posts
- 1,993
- Rep Power
- 25
Re: Intel HD Graphics 4000 is as good as a 48 shader Nvidia card?
It's probably as good as a 96 shader nvidia card (525m). But clocks and memory are different so you can't just say 16 intel shaders = x nvidia shaders.
-
29th April 2012, 07:24 PM #5Notebook Consultant
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Posts
- 173
- Rep Power
- 13
Re: Intel HD Graphics 4000 is as good as a 48 shader Nvidia card?
What about driver support and image quality (2D and 3D)? How do they compare in this respect?
Laptop: HP m6, i5-3210M, Windows 7 Home Premium SP1 64Bit, 8GB RAM, Intel HD4000
Laptop: HP dv7, i5-460M, Windows 7 Home Premium SP1 64Bit, 6GB RAM, Radeon HD 6370M
Router: Netgear WNDR3800 Dual-Band
-
29th April 2012, 07:31 PM #6NBR Super Moderator
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
- NBR Moderator HQ
- Posts
- 16,271
- Rep Power
- 89
Re: Intel HD Graphics 4000 is as good as a 48 shader Nvidia card?
The architectures are so drastically different there is really no way to compare Intel shaders against nVidia shaders. Same thing when trying to compare AMD shaders against them.
All you can really conclude based off of shader count is how two cards in the same generation from the same company compare.Desktop 13.3" Macbook Air W7 Ultimate, Core i7 2600k, Crucial M4 128GB SSD
8GB RAM, GTX 680, 3x Dell U2412M SurroundSnow Leopard, 1.86GHz, 2GB RAM
128GB SSD, iPod Touch, 32GB iPad
-
29th April 2012, 07:52 PM #7Notebook Deity
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 846
- Rep Power
- 13
Re: Intel HD Graphics 4000 is as good as a 48 shader Nvidia card?
^even that is pretty flaky depending on how the memory bus scales.
at the end of the day, figure out what games you ACTUALLY PLAY and pick the graphics solution that works best in those games.
-
29th April 2012, 07:56 PM #8(Really odd person)
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Posts
- 5,434
- Rep Power
- 37
Re: Intel HD Graphics 4000 is as good as a 48 shader Nvidia card?
Greg is right. Even Nvidia`s own shaders are tricky to compare between generations, like Fermi vs Kepler.
-
29th April 2012, 08:12 PM #9
Re: Intel HD Graphics 4000 is as good as a 48 shader Nvidia card?
I think initial benchmarks of HD 4000 was around 550v/5650 Mobility performance which is drastically better than HD 3000 (around 8600M GT mark).

Alienware M17x R2 (Gaming DTR) : i7-920XM|16GB DDR3|5870 Mobility CrossFire|Samsung 840 Series 512 GB SSD|17.1" RGBLED WUXGA|7HP|Nebula Red
Sager NP8690 (Backup Gaming DTR): i7-720QM|8 GB DDR3|GeForce 280M|Samsung PM810 series 256 GB SSD|15.6" 1080p LCD|7HP
Backup server: Pentium G630|8GB DDR3|Gigabyte Z77-DS3H|Intel HD 2000|Samsung 830 64 GB SSD, 2 x Seagate 1.5 TB 5900rpm RAID 1|7HP|NZXT Source 210
Other Toys: '94 Acura Integra RS|Google/LG Nexus 4 16 GB| Dell Vostro 1500| Looking for an AT&T or unlocked GSM iPhone 4!
-
29th April 2012, 08:37 PM #10
Re: Intel HD Graphics 4000 is as good as a 48 shader Nvidia card?
I will bench my i7-3610QM when I get it for HD 4000 performance. Granted the GPU has max speed of 1.1GHz vs 1.25GHz of the i7-3720QM but that shouldn't matter much I think. I'm also hoping to be able to boost RAM speeds up to at least 2000 if I can find the right RAM and check IGP performance there.

Sager NP9150 'Prometheus': 15.6" 1080p matte - i7-3740QM - GTX 680m - 16GB 1600 - 512GB+mSATA 256GB Crucial M4 - Blu-Ray
Sager NP6110 'Firefly': 11.6" 768p matte - i7-3610QM - GT 650m - 8GB 1600 - 500GB Samsung 840
Sager Reviews: UPDATED 5/9/13 NP6110 w/650m i5 vs i7 | NP9570 w/680m SLI | NP9370 w/ 680m SLI | NP9150 w/680m | PREMA'S CLEVO BIOS | MOD 680m vBIOS
My WHS 2011 | HP 6475b A10-4600m | All my other crap



LinkBack URL




Reply With Quote


I`m upgrading, are you? (GTX 780M...
Today, 02:34 AM in Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)