Quantcast Intel HD Graphics 4000 is as good as a 48 shader Nvidia card? - Page 6

+ Reply to Thread
Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456
Results 51 to 59 of 59
  1. #51
    Stanley Cup Round 2! :)
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    at The Joe
    Posts
    25,318
    Rep Power
    131

    Default Re: Intel HD Graphics 4000 is as good as a 48 shader Nvidia card?

    While I agree, the issue is that scaling from a smaller to a larger resolution can look blurry. It looks best at native resolution.

    Sager NP9150 'Prometheus': 15.6" 1080p matte - i7-3740QM - GTX 680m - 16GB 1600 - 512GB+mSATA 256GB Crucial M4 - Blu-Ray
    Sager NP6110 'Firefly': 11.6" 768p matte - i7-3610QM - GT 650m - 8GB 1600 - 500GB Samsung 840
    Sager Reviews: NP6110 w/650m i5 vs i7 | NP9570 w/680m SLI | NP9370 w/ 680m SLI | NP9150 w/680m | PREMA'S CLEVO BIOS | MOD 680m vBIOS
    My WHS 2011 | Trinity A10-4600m 7660G | All my other crap

  2. #52
    Notebook Deity
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,457
    Rep Power
    24

    Default Re: Intel HD Graphics 4000 is as good as a 48 shader Nvidia card?

    Quote Originally Posted by HTWingNut View Post
    As far as HD 4000 / 3610QM is concerned, the issue is non-standard resolutions. The results from notebook check are at 1280x768 not the 3DMark06 and Vantage standard of 1280x1024. They do this because it fits on the screen, but imho, it only causes confusion. Here's my run at 1280x768 which matches up to Notebookcheck. Same thing goes for 3DMark Vantage.
    That's not true. Notebookcheck and Anandtech got 4000 in 3DMark Vantage using default 1280x1024 resolution:

    AnandTech - Mobile Ivy Bridge and ASUS N56VM Preview
    Intel HD Graphics 4000 - Notebookcheck.net Tech

    And it seems 1280x720 is default for 3DMark11. 3DMark06 is off but I'm dismissing that. Also your score isn't lower just in Cinebench, but 3DMark06/3DMark Vantage CPU and X264.

    I still think the Turbo not working is related to thermals/power. That's maybe why it works full with discrete card off.

    Edit: Regarding Turbo clocks, last year Intel was demoing what they called "Hybrid Power Boost", which uses energy from both the AC power adapter and battery to provide the power the system needs. Also, Notebookcheck's review has an update that(the link is in that big 100+ page thread for Sager W110ER you mentioned) said that the Turbo for the CPU is off so GPU can boost.
    Last edited by IntelUser; 13th May 2012 at 07:02 PM.
    Core i7 2600K 3.4GHz
    2x2GB Corsair DDR3-1600 @ 1333 9-9-9-24
    HD Graphics 3000
    80GB X25-M G1 + 160GB Seagate + 320GB WD 7200RPM

  3. #53
    Stanley Cup Round 2! :)
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    at The Joe
    Posts
    25,318
    Rep Power
    131

    Default Re: Intel HD Graphics 4000 is as good as a 48 shader Nvidia card?

    Not sure how it could be related to thermals/power when the GPU isn't even being taxed during CPU testing. Prime95 the CPU boosts to fixed 3.1 GHz with dGPU on or off. In BF3 the CPU boosts, and is one of the more demanding CPU and GPU games out there.

    There is something going on, just not sure exactly what is influencing what or how or why.

    Sager NP9150 'Prometheus': 15.6" 1080p matte - i7-3740QM - GTX 680m - 16GB 1600 - 512GB+mSATA 256GB Crucial M4 - Blu-Ray
    Sager NP6110 'Firefly': 11.6" 768p matte - i7-3610QM - GT 650m - 8GB 1600 - 500GB Samsung 840
    Sager Reviews: NP6110 w/650m i5 vs i7 | NP9570 w/680m SLI | NP9370 w/ 680m SLI | NP9150 w/680m | PREMA'S CLEVO BIOS | MOD 680m vBIOS
    My WHS 2011 | Trinity A10-4600m 7660G | All my other crap

  4. #54
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    u.s.
    Posts
    257
    Rep Power
    10

    Default Re: Intel HD Graphics 4000 is as good as a 48 shader Nvidia card?

    And now the 7660G is even better posting 2-5% better benches. It feels bad to know that your dedicated GPU is getting raped by an integrated chip.

    The N51VN-A1:
    T9600|GT 240m@330m|4GB DDR2|64GB + 320GB@7200 / 22"@1080p
    3Dmark06 6224
    Pcmark Vantage 6674
    3Dmark Vantage P2498
    Next Notebook:
    8+ cores at 4+ GHZ | 5120+ shader ATI GPU | Quad SSD's. 3Dmark11E ~12000 PCMark 7D ~14000 Crysis 3.5 at 61fps
    (unless the cloud destroys the PC market)

  5. #55
    Notebook Deity
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    1,178
    Rep Power
    10

    Default Re: Intel HD Graphics 4000 is as good as a 48 shader Nvidia card?

    Quote Originally Posted by lebob23 View Post
    And now the 7660G is even better posting 2-5% better benches. It feels bad to know that your dedicated GPU is getting raped by an integrated chip.
    It happens!

    Take for example my A8's 6620G v. my discrete 6470M. Lenovo, you guys suck!
    HP ProBook 6475b
    AMD A10-4600M - AMD Radeon HD 7660G - Samsung M471B1G73BH0-YK0 C11 DDR3L-1600 2x8GB RAM - Samsung 830 256GB SSD - Broadcom BCM943228HM4L 802.11a/b/g/n 2x2 WiFi Adapter - Broadcom 20702 Bluetooth 4.0 Adapter - HP DVD A DS8A8SH - HP 720p webcam - AU Optronics B140XW01 V9 1366x768 14" matte display - AKE BC338/BC618T eSATA/Dual-USB3.0 ExpressCard - MS Windows 7 Pro x64 + MS Windows 8 Pro x64

  6. #56
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    u.s.
    Posts
    257
    Rep Power
    10

    Default Re: Intel HD Graphics 4000 is as good as a 48 shader Nvidia card?

    Quote Originally Posted by davidricardo86 View Post
    It happens!

    Take for example my A8's 6620G v. my discrete 6470M. Lenovo, you guys suck!
    haha that combination doesn't make much sense. I guess if it has mxm there are options...

    The N51VN-A1:
    T9600|GT 240m@330m|4GB DDR2|64GB + 320GB@7200 / 22"@1080p
    3Dmark06 6224
    Pcmark Vantage 6674
    3Dmark Vantage P2498
    Next Notebook:
    8+ cores at 4+ GHZ | 5120+ shader ATI GPU | Quad SSD's. 3Dmark11E ~12000 PCMark 7D ~14000 Crysis 3.5 at 61fps
    (unless the cloud destroys the PC market)

  7. #57
    KLF
    KLF is offline
    NBR Super Modernator
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,715
    Rep Power
    22

    Default Re: Intel HD Graphics 4000 is as good as a 48 shader Nvidia card?

    Quote Originally Posted by lebob23 View Post
    haha that combination doesn't make much sense. I guess if it has mxm there are options...
    HD 6470M supports Eyefinity and can run more displays at once. Useful in a business environment where power isn't everything but being able to run 4x FullHD displays is.
    HP 8560w DC & 2530p. Driving an Audi, riding a Ducati.

  8. #58
    Notebook Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    66
    Rep Power
    3

    Default Re: Intel HD Graphics 4000 is as good as a 48 shader Nvidia card?

    Hopefully now Intel can get rid of there horrible 'Atom' platform.

    If a Netbook had HD5000 graphics I'd certainly get one.

  9. #59
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    384
    Rep Power
    17

    Default Re: Intel HD Graphics 4000 is as good as a 48 shader Nvidia card?

    Quote Originally Posted by DarkSiren View Post
    Hopefully now Intel can get rid of there horrible 'Atom' platform.

    If a Netbook had HD5000 graphics I'd certainly get one.
    It has to happen.

    Actually, maybe they'll just move Atom down next to the cell phone level?

 

 
Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:24 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0