Quantcast The new SSD Thread (Benchmarks, Brands, News and Advice) - Page 98

Closed Thread
Page 98 of 923 FirstFirst ... 4888949596979899100101102108148198598 ... LastLast
Results 971 to 980 of 9222
  1. #971
    Eat.My.Shorts
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    ®oaming NBR
    Posts
    2,079
    Rep Power
    22

    Default Re: The new SSD Thread (Benchmarks, Brands, News and Advice)

    **** it...dseo80 looks smart in the avatar and seems to know what they're talking about. MLC, SLC, MLC, SLC....enee, menee, minee, mo!



    HP ML110G6 Server:
    Intel Xeon X3440 @ 2.53GHz | 16GB DDR3 Mem. | (1)500GB HDD (3)250GB HDDs in Software RAID5 | Windows Server 2012 Standard


    Envy 14 Beats:
    Intel Core i5 560M @ 2.67GHz (32nm) | 8GB DDR3 Mem. | Crucial M4 120GB SSD | *BrightView* 1366x768 LCD | Windows 8 Enterprise x64

  2. #972
    SSD User
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,149
    Rep Power
    19

    Default Re: The new SSD Thread (Benchmarks, Brands, News and Advice)

    newkleer, got it! I agree! And although I canot afford it, Master Card can! Life is short.

    And makaveli72, just noticed your avatar and it ROCKS. That was and is a **** fine movie Dave (world's oldest teenager

  3. #973
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    152
    Rep Power
    12

    Default Re: The new SSD Thread (Benchmarks, Brands, News and Advice)

    Quote Originally Posted by Cape Consultant View Post
    Very interesting, dseo80. This is just the type of info I was looking for. Bottom line, should I get the Intel MLC 80GB when it comes out? Capacity is third with me after reliability and SPEED. I still get the feeling that MLC, for whatever reason, is possibly not RELIABLE enough. I do understand that your post tells me I am wrong on this, and I hope I am. Still waiting, Dave
    If you need to write and rewrite ALOT of data (~1TB/day) very often then No. Regardless of what intel says one disadvantage MLC will have at these small densities are limited endruance (the number of times the same cell can be written to).

    However consider: if you rewrite your entire 80GB SDD every day. It would still take 10,000 cycles or 28 years before the flash failed. If wear leveling is implemented very well as in the intel drive (as i assume it is), the drive will be obsolete technology long before failure. Also note as the density of drives increases (128GB, 256GB, 512GB) for the same usage lifetime increases. The small endurance of MLC cells only becomes an issue when densities are small (think back to 1GB, 2GB USB flash drives). Then its likely you could write and rewrite these drives many times per day. For massive SSDs (64GB+) i dont really see an issue in reliability.

    In conclusion: should you buy the drive? If you have the money and dont need large capacity drives then YES. The intel drive looks to offer a substantial improvement over previous SSDs as well as all conventional HDDs.

    Personally I think the drive its too much right now, if it was 120GB at that price I would be very tempted to buy one. However the samsung 128 GB SSD (which has yet to prove itself ofcourse...) offered in dell laptops is only 450$ (with so many dell coupons its actually less). Thats ~30% more storage for ~50% of the price (again i stress the performance of the drive will be very important). Even if it offers performance near the current 64GB SLC SSD from samsung (and i believe it will, samsung's philosophy isn't release of "budget" class devices that suffer in performance for gain in price) it seems like a better buy than the intel drive.

    Unfortunately the same 128GB samsung drives seem to be on ebay for much more (~$1000).

    *I neglected to mention anything about what happens when a failure actually DOES occur, you lose 2 bits in an MLC but only 1 bit in and SLC and this makes correcting the error much easier in SLC devices, however probability that First a failure needs to occur, Then it has to be recoverable in the SLC device but not the MLC device statistically small enough to ignore.

    EDIT: I would also like to point out that when I previously said MLC is the future of SSDs I am talking about MLC in future SSDs and Intel's SSDs. Les's opinion regarding current MLC SSDs using Jmicron controller (OCZ Core, Ridata blah blah) are 100% on the mark in regards to speed and performance. In addition reliability in current Jmicron controller based SSDs seem to lack reliability due to some issues with the controller as well (data corruption being reported in both dell and ocz forums).
    Last edited by dseo80; 11th September 2008 at 01:38 AM.
    XPS M1530 128GB Samsung SSD/Server 2008 x64

  4. #974
    SSD User
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,149
    Rep Power
    19

    Default Re: The new SSD Thread (Benchmarks, Brands, News and Advice)

    Thank you. I have been folllowing this thread since its first post, and there is an amazing amount of information here. This Jmicron controller issue does bother me. All along, it was said that an SSD would be a better safer place to keep your data. It is hard to remember the last time a spinning drive corrupting data was mentioned in any sort of widespread form. Can you say Deskstar???

    I am going to keep a sharp eye out for Samsung and Intel, and see if I can strike! I just do much surfing, emial, web design and mesing around in general, so no worries here about too much writing, I will be dead before it wears out

    Dave

  5. #975
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Troy, IL (STL Area)
    Posts
    381
    Rep Power
    23

    Default Re: The new SSD Thread (Benchmarks, Brands, News and Advice)

    Quote Originally Posted by dseo80 View Post
    However consider: if you rewrite your entire 80GB SDD every day. It would still take 10,000 cycles or 28 years before the flash failed. If wear leveling is implemented very well as in the intel drive (as i assume it is), the drive will be obsolete technology long before failure. Also note as the density of drives increases (128GB, 256GB, 512GB) for the same usage lifetime increases. The small endurance of MLC cells only becomes an issue when densities are small (think back to 1GB, 2GB USB flash drives). Then its likely you could write and rewrite these drives many times per day. For massive SSDs (64GB+) i dont really see an issue in reliability.
    I somehow doubt that each cell will fail on write 10,001 on a consistent and repeatable basis. That is likely a "safe number" based on large numbers of cycles.

    So individual cells will vary with many (maybe even all of them) enduring beyond that threshold.

    Best,
    Asus C90S w/ | E6600 2.4 GHz | 3GB RAM |
    8600M GT / 512MB | G. Skill Titan 128GB SSD /
    Computer Geek / HT Reviewer / Sleep Deprived

  6. #976
    Les
    Les is offline
    Not associated with NotebookReview in any way
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    5,391
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: The new SSD Thread (Benchmarks, Brands, News and Advice)

    dseo80....

    Thank you. Your knowledge is very apparent and it is nice to see that here. I can't recall the number of back and forth conversations I have had regarding calculations of ssd life.

    If I can ask just one thing??? Stay please. Your a welcome resource.

  7. #977
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    152
    Rep Power
    12

    Default Re: The new SSD Thread (Benchmarks, Brands, News and Advice)

    Quote Originally Posted by John Kotches View Post
    I somehow doubt that each cell will fail on write 10,001 on a consistent and repeatable basis. That is likely a "safe number" based on large numbers of cycles.

    So individual cells will vary with many (maybe even all of them) enduring beyond that threshold.

    Best,
    That is correct: 10,000 is the minimum number of cycles for ~99.9% of a number of given NAND flash cells.
    XPS M1530 128GB Samsung SSD/Server 2008 x64

  8. #978
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    152
    Rep Power
    12

    Default Re: The new SSD Thread (Benchmarks, Brands, News and Advice)

    Quote Originally Posted by Les View Post
    dseo80....

    Thank you. Your knowledge is very apparent and it is nice to see that here. I can't recall the number of back and forth conversations I have had regarding calculations of ssd life.

    If I can ask just one thing??? Stay please. Your a welcome resource.
    Thanks alot Les coming from the NBR expert on SSDs that means alot!
    Just glad to be on board!
    XPS M1530 128GB Samsung SSD/Server 2008 x64

  9. #979
    SSD User
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,149
    Rep Power
    19

    Default Re: The new SSD Thread (Benchmarks, Brands, News and Advice)

    Let's say I wanted to buy the Intel 80GB SSD NOW! Where would I get it? When could I get it? Who will be the first to have it?

    Way too many secrets about this type of thing, let's get this info out so we can be ready to POUNCE!

    Dave

  10. #980
    Eat.My.Shorts
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    ®oaming NBR
    Posts
    2,079
    Rep Power
    22

    Default Re: The new SSD Thread (Benchmarks, Brands, News and Advice)

    That's what i'm talking about Dave..let's get aggressive!



    HP ML110G6 Server:
    Intel Xeon X3440 @ 2.53GHz | 16GB DDR3 Mem. | (1)500GB HDD (3)250GB HDDs in Software RAID5 | Windows Server 2012 Standard


    Envy 14 Beats:
    Intel Core i5 560M @ 2.67GHz (32nm) | 8GB DDR3 Mem. | Crucial M4 120GB SSD | *BrightView* 1366x768 LCD | Windows 8 Enterprise x64

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:14 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0