Quantcast Gaming performance vs. Resolution

Closed Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    9
    Rep Power
    17

    Default Gaming performance vs. Resolution

    When shopping for a laptop with a mid range graphics card, ala the x1600, is it advisable to choose the laptop with the screen that has a lower resolution?

    For example
    Laptop#1 15.4" screen, 1280x800, x1600 256mb
    Laptop#2 15.4" screen, 1440x900, x1600 256mb

    All the rest of the specs being the same would laptop #1 play games more fluid and at higher detail settings? Or could you scale down the resolution on Laptop #2 and play the games at the same detail while retaining native resolution like quality?

    I think I know the answer, but I just wanted to make sure.

    -MP

  2. #2
    Linux geek con rat flail!
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    7,106
    Rep Power
    48

    Default Re: Gaming performance vs. Resolution

    Depends. Yes, the first laptop would play more games more fluid at the full resolution. But that's not for all games. Quake 3 would play maxed out on either of them You can also just deal with the interpolation of scaling a lower resolution to the 1440x900 screen, especially since most cards will scale without changing the aspect ratio any more (FINALLY!). It depends on whether you think you'll need the extra desktop space of the 1440x900, and if you think the pixels would be too tiny I'd be inclined to go with the higher res myself if I were going to get a 15.4". I had a 1280x800 in a 15.4". While it was a nice laptop overall, the pixels always just seemed too big to me. I'm getting a 1280x800 in a 14.1" factor next.
    HP Envy 15 | Win7x64 | i5-540M | Radeon 5830 1GB | 6GB DDR3-1066 | 256GB Crucial M225 SSD | Matte 15.6" 1920x1080
    Get your answers here!
    Answers: $5
    Good Answers: $10
    Correct Answers: $20
    Well-researched Answers complete with reference: time and materials
    Dumb looks are still free

    __________________

  3. #3
    NBR Lead Moderator
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Forest Moon
    Posts
    34,283
    Rep Power
    169

    Default Re: Gaming performance vs. Resolution

    This really depends on the game itself as Pitabred posted. Generally, the X1600 is powerful enough that it can play most games at a 1440x900 (keep in mind a lot of games don't support that resolution, but they can be made to - www.widescreengamingforum.com), but with the exception of some newer games (Oblivion, FEAR).
    If possible, I would go for the WXGA+ (1440x900) screen. You'll appreciate the extra screen real estate when it comes to web surfing and other general tasks.
    NotebookReview Writer & Reviewer
    hp EliteBook 8740w 17" DreamColor2 1920x1200, Windows 7 Pro, Core i5-560M, ATI FirePro M7820, 8GB RAM, 120GB Intel 320 SSD, Intel 6300 WLAN
    Notebook Warranty Guide | Computer Optimization Guide | SSD Upgrade Guide: How and Why

  4. #4
    NBR Resident Redneck.
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Deer stand back in the pines.
    Posts
    5,003
    Rep Power
    39

    Default Re: Gaming performance vs. Resolution

    Well with a modern game that just came out yes the first would play more smoothly. Granted you could take the 2nd down to the same res, but lower then native res looks like poo. But the x1600 is a beefy card so it will be able to handle that res in most games.

    Main rig: Dell precision m4600 - 2860QM, firepro 5950, 16GB 1600mhz RAM 9-9-9-28, WLED FDH+, Intel 520 240GB mSata OS, Seagate hybrid 750GB storage.
    Home Web/FTP/SSH Server: Dell precision m4400 Debian squeeze

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:19 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0