+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 28
-
2nd January 2012, 10:18 AM #1Notebook Consultant
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Posts
- 115
- Rep Power
- 10
1920x1080 vs 1600x900 ? Which is preferred?
Just wondering what gamers prefer. Which resolution is better?
I found a lot of ASUS laptops that have nice specs and all but the downside of that was that the screen resolution was 1600x900. I personally prefer 1920x1080 for pretty much everything~
-- And to add on, isn't 1920x1080 the standard for today? Isn't anything below that considered "bad" ?
-
2nd January 2012, 10:23 AM #2
Re: 1920x1080 vs 1600x900 ? Which is preferred?
Baka personally prefers 1920x1080 ._. Higher resolution pretty much means Baka doesn't need Anti Aliasing turned on and it'll still look great with barely any jagged edges. Some people prefers lower resolution due to the larger icons maybe but Baka thinks most prefer higher resolutions too ._. Smaller screens will get lower resolutions so Baka doesn't think 1920x1080 is today's standard. For anything above 15.6", maybe. For below that, no.
-
2nd January 2012, 01:30 PM #3
Re: 1920x1080 vs 1600x900 ? Which is preferred?
is 1920 x 1080 worth it on a laptop?
Is 1600.. bad- not necessarily. But Baka makes some very good points that are reinforced by this thread. I had to get new glasses when I went to full HD on 17.3 inch (using native resolution) asus screen, but am very glad I went that route.
-
2nd January 2012, 01:34 PM #4Notebook Consultant
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Posts
- 203
- Rep Power
- 18
Re: 1920x1080 vs 1600x900 ? Which is preferred?
I would say for a 17 inch screen, go with 1920 x 1080. But for a 15 inch screen go with 1600 x 900.
Sure 1920 looks better than 1600, but your games are going to have much less frames per second as well.M14x | i7 2630QM | 4GB RAM | 1.5GB GT 555M (Overclocked to 740) | 750GB 7200RPM HD | 1600x900 Screen | 6205 Intel Wireless | Bluetooth 3.0 | Black
-
2nd January 2012, 01:46 PM #5
Re: 1920x1080 vs 1600x900 ? Which is preferred?
Whatever you want. I would get 1920x1080 personally...hell, I would get 1920x1080 on my 12" netbook if I could. But some people prefer lower resolutions, especially on laptops, because it makes things easier to read for those without great eyesight, and lower resolutions are less taxing on your graphics card for gaming.
Machine:
[ i5-2500k @ 4.0GHz | MSI P67A-G43 | Cooler Master V8 | Corsair TX750 V2 750W | 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws X Series 1600MHz | Antec Nine Hundred Two V3 | ASUS GTX 580 DirectCU II triple-slot 1536MB | 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3 ]
Periphs:
[ Hannspree SL231 23-inch 1920x1080 LED | Razer Mamba + Goliathus Alpha extra-large Speed Edition | Razer Blackwidow Ultimate (Cherry MX Blue) | Belkin n52te | Razer Carcharias ]
-
2nd January 2012, 02:21 PM #6
Re: 1920x1080 vs 1600x900 ? Which is preferred?
1080p has advantage which reach beyond gaming. I'd accept no less, even on a 15.6" screen.
P170HM | i7-2630QM | 6970M | 8GB 1333MHz RAM | CM4 128GB SSD | 320GB 7200.4 | BRD
-
2nd January 2012, 02:26 PM #7
Re: 1920x1080 vs 1600x900 ? Which is preferred?
i wish i could still get 1680x1050 for 15" then i would be happy.
blind in one eye so anyone with sight problems could struggle with 1920x1080>>>--- Everything you need to Monitor Temperatures & More ---<<<
--> Free Burning Software <--
--> How to manually update your Nvidia drivers <-- --> Benchmark Survey <-- --> Benchmark Results Only <--
---(P150EM) : XMG P502 -mySN UK- i7 3720QM / 680GTX / 16GB Ram / 512GB Crucial SSD (The Dogz Dangley Bits)---

-
2nd January 2012, 02:38 PM #8
Re: 1920x1080 vs 1600x900 ? Which is preferred?
Even with high resolution on small screens there's always font scaling. It's pretty decent these days. Everything looks so crisp and clean.
I prefer high resolutions, always have 1920x1080 on 14" or larger, although it's pretty difficult to find anything but 1366x768 on a 14".
Sager NP9150 'Prometheus': 15.6" 1080p matte - i7-3740QM - GTX 680m - 16GB 1600 - 512GB+mSATA 256GB Crucial M4 - Blu-Ray
Sager NP6110 'Firefly': 11.6" 768p matte - i7-3610QM - GT 650m - 8GB 1600 - 500GB Samsung 840
Sager Reviews: NP6110 w/650m i5 vs i7 | NP9570 w/680m SLI | NP9370 w/ 680m SLI | NP9150 w/680m | PREMA'S CLEVO BIOS | MOD 680m vBIOS
My WHS 2011 | Trinity A10-4600m 7660G | All my other crap
-
2nd January 2012, 02:44 PM #9
Re: 1920x1080 vs 1600x900 ? Which is preferred?
1080p, absolutely
RIVA TNT2 > Geforce Go 7200 > FireGL v5600 > GTX 460m > GTX 580m > HD 7970m
-
2nd January 2012, 02:45 PM #10
Re: 1920x1080 vs 1600x900 ? Which is preferred?
I am in agreement here 1920 x1080, but that is ONLY because there are no more 1920 x 1200 screens.

Alienware M17xR2
Core i7 920XM | 256GB Samsung SSD + 500 GB Seagate Momentus | 17" 102% Wide Gamut 1920 x 1200 RGBLED | Blu-ray Burner | ATI Mobility Radeon 5870 x2 | 8GB DDR3@1333MHZ | Bigfoot Killer Wireless -N 1103 | Soundblaster X-FI Surround 5.1 Pro + TB HPA2 True 5.1 Headset w/ TB Z6a In line amp



LinkBack URL




Reply With Quote



I`m upgrading, are you? (GTX 780M...
Today, 02:21 PM in Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)