Quantcast Battlefield 3 Discussion Thread

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 646 123451151101501 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 6453
Like Tree37Likes

Thread: Battlefield 3 Discussion Thread

  1. #1
    Notebook Nobel Laureate
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Kepler-22b
    Posts
    7,193
    Rep Power
    49

    Default Battlefield 3 Discussion Thread

    Battlefield 3 aka BF3


    Release Date: 10/25/11
    Platforms: PC, Xbox 360, PS3


    Battlefield 3 (commonly abbreviated to BF3) is a first-person shooter action video game, being developed by EA Digital Illusions CE and to be published by Electronic Arts. The game is set to be released on October 25, 2011 on Microsoft Windows, PlayStation 3, Xbox 360 and EA Mobile confirmed a port for the iOS platform. It is a direct sequel to 2005's Battlefield 2, but the eleventh installment in the Battlefield franchise.
    Last edited by usapatriot; 27th September 2011 at 11:14 AM.

  2. #2
    Stanley Cup Round 2! :)
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    at The Joe
    Posts
    25,338
    Rep Power
    131

    Default Re: Battlefield 3 Discussion Thread

    I just really really really really really really hope that they don't botch this. Battlefield 2 is one of my all time favorite games ever. Bad Company 2 is fun, but it just doesn't seem to capture that same feeling of teamwork and overall battle experience.

    Sager NP9150 'Prometheus': 15.6" 1080p matte - i7-3740QM - GTX 680m - 16GB 1600 - 512GB+mSATA 256GB Crucial M4 - Blu-Ray
    Sager NP6110 'Firefly': 11.6" 768p matte - i7-3610QM - GT 650m - 8GB 1600 - 500GB Samsung 840
    Sager Reviews: NP6110 w/650m i5 vs i7 | NP9570 w/680m SLI | NP9370 w/ 680m SLI | NP9150 w/680m | PREMA'S CLEVO BIOS | MOD 680m vBIOS
    My WHS 2011 | Trinity A10-4600m 7660G | All my other crap

  3. #3
    Notebook Nobel Laureate
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Kepler-22b
    Posts
    7,193
    Rep Power
    49

    Default Re: Battlefield 3 Discussion Thread

    DICE has said they have a special and dedicated team working on the BF3 version of the game. So hopefully it will not disappoint. DICE employees have let out a few tidbits or clues on their Twitter's about BF3 but nothing concrete yet.

    Seems like we will have to wait till GDC or that German magazine that's supposed to feature BF3 next month.
    Sony Vaio S13 - i5-3210M - 6GB - 750GB - Win 8

  4. #4
    <3 xkcd
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    1,265
    Rep Power
    22

    Default Re: Battlefield 3 Discussion Thread

    New engine means new problems but also great advances... I'm guessing once the bugs are sorted it'll be better than BF2 and won't disappoint. Unless they are doing it backwards and making the console version firstm then porting it to pc :|, which results in something like CoDBO (BUGS!).
    (2012) Macbook Air- i7 2.0ghz, HD4000, 13" 1440x900 LEDLCD, 256GB SSD/8GB DDR3, OSX+ Win7 + Debian
    (2010) Asus G73jhA2- i7-720, ATI 5870 1GB GDDR5, 17" 1920x1080 LEDLCD, 1TB 7200/8GB DDR3, Win7 + Debian
    (2006) Compal HEL80- C2D T5600 @2.18ghz OC, NV go7600 256mb GDDR2 OC'd, 15" 1280x800 LCD, 120GB 5400/2GB DDR2, WinXP - retired
    Join the NBR BF3 platoon! |
    Quick G73 setup guide

  5. #5
    Notebook Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    71
    Rep Power
    6

    Default Re: Battlefield 3 Discussion Thread

    I hope there is a commander mode like in BF2 and 2142. I also hope we get 64 player games back.
    Dell XPS 15 - Intel i7-740QM - 6 GB Ram - Nvidia 435m 2GB

    www.thebestiphoneappsblog.com

  6. #6
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    567
    Rep Power
    9

    Default Re: Battlefield 3 Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by bobbyb0322 View Post
    I hope there is a commander mode like in BF2 and 2142. I also hope we get 64 player games back.
    If this game doesn't have 64 OR MORE players I am going to be supremely annoyed. If they could do 64 players years ago in BF1942, why not now? Even with destruction it shouldn't be too bad given how powerful computers are these days. I would rather have more players and less destruction than only 32 players. Of course the problem with these multiplatform games is that (at least in the past) they have had essentially the same maps for PC and consoles, and it is very hard to have one map work for both 16 people and 64 people. COD4 had 50+ player limits, and then we had 52 people playing the tiny shipment map, which is cramped for 8 people. The map sizes in BC2 are pretty pathetic compared with BF2 and 2142 (1942 as well). Many of the maps in those games are just as long as the longest Rush mode maps, but much wider.

    I also hope we get more team organization, and VOIP that people actually use. Some planes would be nice too, as well as PRONE FUNCTIONALITY!!!!! Seriously, if there is no prone in BF3 I am not buying it (ok, I probably still will since I have been waiting 3+ years for this game).
    Laptop: Lenovo y460 intel i5 520m cpu, ATI 5650 mobility video card, Seagate Momentus XT 500 GB hybrid HDD, Dell u2211H e-ips monitor, +eGPU gtx 560Ti x1 opt. (shared with desktop) - P3600 3dmark11 score
    Desktop: Core i5 2500K @ 4.3 Ghz, MSI Z68 GD65 Motherboard, GTX 560 Ti SC, Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB HDD, 12GB DDR3 1600 Gskill ripjaws x, Benq G2400W - P5000 3dmark11 score
    Logitech G15 (first generation), Logitech G700

  7. #7
    Notebook Nobel Laureate
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Kepler-22b
    Posts
    7,193
    Rep Power
    49

    Default Re: Battlefield 3 Discussion Thread

    Game will apparently be running on Frostbite 2.0 vs 1.5 which is what BC2 runs on. I expect 2.0 to be pretty much an all new engine vs. 1.5 which was incremental from 1.0.

    Let's hope they do a good job with it. Frostbite 1.5 already has excellent capabilities.
    Sony Vaio S13 - i5-3210M - 6GB - 750GB - Win 8

  8. #8
    Notebook Prophet
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    4,459
    Rep Power
    34

    Default Re: Battlefield 3 Discussion Thread

    I am pretty excited for this, I never played BF2, but I am most certainly a shoe-in to buy after I spent a combined total of $35 for BC2 and Vietnam, really can't think of anything that has yielded me so much "bang-for-your-buck" out of any purchase I have ever made.

    Any details on a release, or is it still too early in development to say?
    On Order: Eurocom P370 EM Scorpius
    i7 3720qm 2.6Ghz, 24gb DDR3 1600, RAID-0 Samsung 830 128gb+128gb, Crossfire 7970m 2GB, 1920x1080 17.3 matte, Killer Wireless N 1103

  9. #9
    Stanley Cup Round 2! :)
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    at The Joe
    Posts
    25,338
    Rep Power
    131

    Default Re: Battlefield 3 Discussion Thread

    "By October" is what has been reported. Don't have a link handy. Will do so when I find it.

    Sager NP9150 'Prometheus': 15.6" 1080p matte - i7-3740QM - GTX 680m - 16GB 1600 - 512GB+mSATA 256GB Crucial M4 - Blu-Ray
    Sager NP6110 'Firefly': 11.6" 768p matte - i7-3610QM - GT 650m - 8GB 1600 - 500GB Samsung 840
    Sager Reviews: NP6110 w/650m i5 vs i7 | NP9570 w/680m SLI | NP9370 w/ 680m SLI | NP9150 w/680m | PREMA'S CLEVO BIOS | MOD 680m vBIOS
    My WHS 2011 | Trinity A10-4600m 7660G | All my other crap

  10. #10
    The guy from The Notebook
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    8,620
    Rep Power
    53

    Default Re: Battlefield 3 Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Mjolner View Post
    If this game doesn't have 64 OR MORE players I am going to be supremely annoyed. If they could do 64 players years ago in BF1942, why not now? Even with destruction it shouldn't be too bad given how powerful computers are these days. I would rather have more players and less destruction than only 32 players. Of course the problem with these multiplatform games is that (at least in the past) they have had essentially the same maps for PC and consoles, and it is very hard to have one map work for both 16 people and 64 people. COD4 had 50+ player limits, and then we had 52 people playing the tiny shipment map, which is cramped for 8 people. The map sizes in BC2 are pretty pathetic compared with BF2 and 2142 (1942 as well). Many of the maps in those games are just as long as the longest Rush mode maps, but much wider.

    I also hope we get more team organization, and VOIP that people actually use. Some planes would be nice too, as well as PRONE FUNCTIONALITY!!!!! Seriously, if there is no prone in BF3 I am not buying it (ok, I probably still will since I have been waiting 3+ years for this game).
    You don't understand the problem. Computer speeds have been getting faster. A lot faster. And so, the engines are getting more complicated, including additional physics, and the result is that you need to keep all the clients in sync with a lot of additional information. But internet speeds have hardly changed. That's the problem. 64 players was reasonable when basically all you had to do was sync up everyone's location and orientation. There is so much more data that needs to be passed around in a game like BC2... We need faster internet to handle more players.

 

 
Page 1 of 646 123451151101501 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:10 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0