Closed Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 54
-
4th March 2009, 06:56 AM #1Notebook Enthusiast
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Posts
- 29
- Rep Power
- 13
GTX 280M Benchmarks from notebookcheck
Notebookcheck.de claims they have tested the GTX 280M , here are their results:
Notebook:
* Clevo M980NU 18.4“ Barebone (Pre-Production Sample)
* Nvidia GeForce GTX 280M mit 1024 GDDR 3 (585/1463/950) im MXM 3.0 Slot (Pre-Production Sample)
* Intel Core 2 Duo X9100 3.1 GHz CPU
* 2048 MB DDR3
* 320 GB 5400 U/min HDD
* Vista 64 Bit

Cod 4, 1280x1024, 4xaa, all on or high -75
Far Cry 2 640 low 97,5
Far Cry 2 XGA high 62,1
Far Cry 2 SXGA very high 40,4
Call of Juarez high XGA 4xAA 33,4
Crysis Warhead 800x600, low 76
Crysis Warhead XGA, very high 21
Crysis Warhead SXGA, very high 17
Crysis Warhead 1080p, very high 12
WIC 800, very low 176
WIC XGA, high 46
WIC XGA, med 77
WIC SXGA very hig 26
Supreme Commander XGA, high, 2xAA 45,4
HL2 Lost Coast XGA high 143,7
Crysis XGA GPU low 105,7
Crysis XGA GPU med 66,5
Crysis XGA GPU high 44,7
Crysis SXGA GPU very high 20,4
Doom3 low 161
Doom3 ultra 160
Doom3 ultra 1280x1024 16xAA 36
Burn Out Paradise 1920x1200 high 60
Fear 2 Demo SXGA high 94
ET Quake Wars 1080p ultra 57
Edit: Somehow pressed TAB then Space and its posted without the Benchmark results, Sry!Last edited by Quiz; 4th March 2009 at 07:05 AM.
Desktop:e2160 @ 3,0 ghz / 2GB Patriot LLK / Gigabyte P35-DS3 / nVidia GTX 260
.
Laptop: HP dv6000
-
4th March 2009, 06:58 AM #2Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Posts
- 631
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: GTX 280M Benchmarks from notebookcheck
And.....you forgot to post the results of the benchmarks.
EDIT : Alright! The 3DMark06 seems awfully low in my opinion .. didn't the ATI 4870X2 break the 20k barrier?Last edited by Akuma; 4th March 2009 at 07:07 AM.
-
4th March 2009, 07:10 AM #3
Re: GTX 280M Benchmarks from notebookcheck
Right now my 9800M GTX with the OC on it, get's pretty close to what the 280M gets in benchmarks and also in games. For me it is all up to how much you can OC the 280M. If it can ran stable at 700/1750/950 that would be pretty cool.
CLEVO M570ETU
QX9300@2.93GHz | GeForce GTX 280M OC 610/1525/900 | 8GB DDR3 1066MHz CL6 | 17" WUXGA 1920x1200 | 750 GB HDD @ 7200 rpm | Sound Blaster X-Fi PCIe
Windows 8 Pro x64 | 3DMarkVant: 6230 - 3DMark06: 12950 - gaming clocks, no PhysX | ~2h battery life
Uplift, a new Android 3D game! |
Bring back 16:10 screens! Visit this. | The Clevo BIOS thread | How to find your real GDDR frequency
-
4th March 2009, 07:19 AM #4
-
4th March 2009, 08:36 AM #5Notebook Prophet
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Posts
- 4,392
- Rep Power
- 31
Re: GTX 280M Benchmarks from notebookcheck
If someone drew a benchmark chart that looked like Kevin Jack's forum avatar I'd give it just as much credibility as Notebookcheck's benchmark charts.
-
4th March 2009, 08:52 AM #6
Re: GTX 280M Benchmarks from notebookcheck
Am I the only one disappointed from NVIDIA? We still haven't got a REAL upgrade after the 8800M GTX. Oh well, at least ATI is doing something.
Desktop | Core i7 920 | 6GB DDR3 | EVGA X58 | GeForce GTX 295 | 1TB HDD | 24" Samsung T240HD | Ubuntu 10.04
Laptop 0 | ThinkPad R500 | T6670 | 4GB DDR3 | 4500MHD | 500GB HDD | 15.4" WXGA | Ubuntu 10.04
Laptop 1 | ThinkPad T410 | i3-370M | 2GB DDR3 | 4500MHD | 320GB HDD | 14.1" WXGA | Ubuntu 11.04
Laptop 2 | Alienware M11x | SU7300 | 4GB DDR3 | GT 335M | 320GB HDD | 11.6" WXGA | Windows 7
-
4th March 2009, 11:05 AM #7Notebook Evangelist
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Europe
- Posts
- 635
- Rep Power
- 15
Re: GTX 280M Benchmarks from notebookcheck
Its all about price/performance for me in this current generation of mobile GPUs.
-
4th March 2009, 02:15 PM #8
Re: GTX 280M Benchmarks from notebookcheck
But if these performance benchmarks hold true then the GTX 280M isn't going to be the holy grail of mobile graphics.
DELL M4400
- T9600 6MB L3 @ 2.8 GHz
- Quadro FX 1700 [625/800/1450]
- 3GB 800 DDR2
- 15.4" 1440x900 LED backlit
- 250Gb 7200 RPM HDD
- Win XP SP3
-
4th March 2009, 02:55 PM #9Notebook Nobel Laureate
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Posts
- 10,364
- Rep Power
- 57
Re: GTX 280M Benchmarks from notebookcheck
Notebookcheck is known for unreliable stuff. I'll wait to see real member postings on it. I doubt nVidia will win this round considering we haven't compared it to the benchmarks for the GDDR5 version of the 4870. Based on the desktop versions, it should easily destroy the G92b (GTX 280M isn't anything new, just a die shrink).
-
4th March 2009, 03:08 PM #10Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Posts
- 631
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: GTX 280M Benchmarks from notebookcheck
Every ATI bot? You're either a die-hard nVidia fanboy or have some mentality issues.

Notebookcheck is a known BS site. It's good for some things, like maybe their reviews, but 3DMarks, GPU listing etc need some serious attention.



LinkBack URL







I`m upgrading, are you? (GTX 780M...
Yesterday, 10:10 PM in Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)