Quantcast Monster gaming laptops vs. Practical gaming laptops

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18
  1. #1
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    146
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Monster gaming laptops vs. Practical gaming laptops

    I know there will alway be a niche market for the monster laptops that cost $4,000+, weigh 10+ pounds, have a 130W+ power supply, and have SLI GPUs and a 2.8+ GHz processor; but what is the sweet spot regarding cost/benefit for components in a practical gaming computer?

    In 2004 I purchased an Dell XPS laptop with a 3GHz desktop processor and a 256MB GPU. It ran games very well, but it didn't have an available auto/air adaptor, it was huge and looked too obtrusive to use at work, it sucked a lot of power, and it ran hot (I couldn't use it literaly as a laptop). I ended up returning it for an Inspiron 8600 with a 2.2GHz Pentium M, a 128MB ATI Mobility Radeon 9600, a 100GB/5400 HD, and 2 GB RAM. Sure I lost some performance, but it ran games well enough and it was practical for everyday use. It's still not a bad laptop, and it seems like the only real progress in the last few years has been the dual-core processors and more RAM for GPUs.

    Regarding the new Dell XPS 1730: For kicks I priced one out with the Blu-ray, 2x200GB 7200 HDs, and a 2.8 GHz processor at just over $4,800. I have spent over $3,000 in the past on a computer, but $4,800 is scary...I hope it's available with 3 years accidental damage!

    I read somewhere that to take advantge of the SLI 8700s in the XPS 1730 it would be best to get it with the 2.8 Ghz X7900, otherwise the processor may hold back the GPUs in high end games. Wouldn't the X7900 with SLI 8700s be pushing the upper limits of practicality for a laptop in terms of heat, power consumption, and price? It seems like you reach a point where you are better off getting a powerful desktop and a reasonably priced 15.4" laptop.

    And where does it all end? In 3-4 years will we be buying laptops with quad-core 5+ Ghz processors, 2GB/512-bit GPUs, 16GB RAM (complete with a 260W auto/air adaptor and a wheeled carrying case)?
    Last edited by theoak1; 28th September 2007 at 07:51 PM.

  2. #2
    Web Designer & Developer
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,589
    Rep Power
    25

    Default Re: Monster gaming laptops vs. Practical gaming laptops

    there's plenty of laptops that blend together both power and portability... IE, look at the new Asus G1s, F8s, C90s, etc. Also the Acer 5290 Gemstone. In addition, a ton of new 15.4" laptop have Nvidia 8600 GT cards/ATI equivalent in them balancing gaming power with reasonable battery life. IMO, I don't understand buying a 8+ pound laptop...how is it a laptop anymore?

  3. #3
    Mastershake
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    11,135
    Rep Power
    64

    Default Re: Monster gaming laptops vs. Practical gaming laptops

    im in this debate myself i cant decide which way to go.. spend near 2k on a machine that will run anything i want or spend just over 1k on a machine that wil run everything pretty good...
    See my guide on how to make a bootable usb stick: http://forum.notebookreview.com/sager-clevo/246530-how-flash-your-bios-dos-using-usb-stick.html new updated one will be here soon: http://forum.notebookreview.com/show...87&postcount=1
    laptop lol which one... we have 8 currently at home..
    Meatwad you're up next, with your knock-knock.
    Meatwad make the money see. Meatwad get the honeys G. Drivin in my car, living like a star ice on my fingers and my toes, and im a taurus

  4. #4
    Notebook Virtuoso
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,061
    Rep Power
    32

    Default Re: Monster gaming laptops vs. Practical gaming laptops

    For that much I rather get the sager.

    http://www.xoticpc.com/product_info....oducts_id/1932

    Configured with 3 250 7200 rpms and a quad core processor and 4 gigs of ram it will still be cheaper than the overpriced dell.

  5. #5
    look at all the colors...
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    6,222
    Rep Power
    44

    Default Re: Monster gaming laptops vs. Practical gaming laptops

    Well, where you want the balance between portability and power is a personal preference. Personally I say the perfect balance is something like the T61p, which is only 5.0lbs, a little over an inch thick, and has a 64-bit Quadro FX 570m in it (approximately equivalent to the DDR2 8600M-GT). If you push the balance a little farther towards power you get the Macbook Pro and the HP 8510p, the two most portable 15.4" laptops with the two best 15.4" GPU's on the market. Push the balance even farther toward power and you get the HP 8710p, even farther and you get the Alienware M9750.
    Asus F8SV for play
    Dell D830 for work

  6. #6
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    146
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Re: Monster gaming laptops vs. Practical gaming laptops

    I can see someone buying the XPS 1730 who goes to college or brings their laptop to work (where it stays on a desk all day), needs a minimum of portability with maximum performance, and has a ton of cash to drop.

    I think a mid-priced 15.4" is more reasonable, however looking at the XPS 1730 specs gives you monster-rig envy and makes mid range specs seem inadequate. How can you compare playing Supreme Commader on the XPS 1730 as opposed to the Asus G1S?

    I'm just wondering where we'll be in 3-4 years. How fast a processor + GPU can you put in a laptop before it either melts or becomes a 20 lb cinder block?

  7. #7
    NBR Reviewer
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    somewhere pink and fluffy
    Posts
    2,744
    Rep Power
    32

    Default Re: Monster gaming laptops vs. Practical gaming laptops

    The Premium of 17" powerhouses over 15.4" gamers is annoying. I'd kinda like a 17"er but not if the same hardware spec will cost a lot more. 15.4" is ok for me. Plus there's more choice.
    DESKTOP | Antec Sonata III | Sapphire HD7870 2GB | G2130 | 4GB | 500GB/3TB | 22" AOC 1080P
    DELL Vostro 3450 | HD6630M | 2410m | 6GB | 500GB | 14.1" 1366*768 matte
    ASUS X102BA | HD8180 | A4-1200 | 4GB | 500GB |10.1" 1366*768 touch
    SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab 2 7.0
    SAMSUNG Galaxy S3 Mini La Fleur edition
    Reviews: Toshiba Satellite Pro L100 | Zepto 6224W | Packard Bell MZ-36 | Zepto 6625WD

  8. #8
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    DFW, Texas
    Posts
    487
    Rep Power
    21

    Default Re: Monster gaming laptops vs. Practical gaming laptops

    Impossible question to answer. Each person has his own definition of practical size, cost, and value. What is "too much" for you, is "just right" for the next guy.

    I my case, I got the 17" one in my sig alomst a year ago. It fits my needs perfectly. Is it the right choice for everyone, no, of course not.

  9. #9
    Notebook Deity
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    911
    Rep Power
    21

    Default Re: Monster gaming laptops vs. Practical gaming laptops

    Quote Originally Posted by odin243 View Post
    T61p, which is only 5.0lbs, a little over an inch thick, and has a 64-bit Quadro FX 570m in it (approximately equivalent to the DDR2 8600M-GT)
    Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought the 570M is 128bit and comes with GDDR3 which would make it more equivalent to the 8600M GT in the G1S/G2S.

    | Thinkpad T61p | 15.4 WSXGA+ LG | T7500 | NVIDIA FX570M 256MB | NMB kb | 4Gb 667mhz | 200Gb 7K200 | 2Gb RBoost | 4965AGN | Bluetooth | FP reader | 9cell | 3yr PP | Vista Ult x64 |
    | Asus EEE-PC1000HE | Intel Atom N280 | 2Gb DDR2 | 160Gb | 802.11 b/g/n | 10" LED | 6cell | XP Home |

  10. #10
    look at all the colors...
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    6,222
    Rep Power
    44

    Default Re: Monster gaming laptops vs. Practical gaming laptops

    Quote Originally Posted by morphy View Post
    Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought the 570M is 128bit and comes with GDDR3 which would make it more equivalent to the 8600M GT in the G1S/G2S.
    I was speaking of the 14.1" T61p which comes with a 64-bit 128mb version. The 15.4" T61p is indeed as you say, however that laptop is considerably less portable than the 14.1" version.
    Asus F8SV for play
    Dell D830 for work

 

 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Laptops and gaming
    By Nocturnal310 in forum HP & Compaq
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 26th September 2007, 02:35 PM
  2. Battery life of monster 17" gaming laptops?
    By GloStiX in forum Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 11th August 2007, 10:18 PM
  3. gaming laptops
    By forum112 in forum What Notebook Should I Buy?
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 8th July 2007, 03:41 PM
  4. Which of these 2 laptops is best for gaming?
    By Matthew Newell in forum What Notebook Should I Buy?
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 6th April 2006, 10:40 PM
  5. How would these laptops be for gaming?
    By Cutwolf in forum HP & Compaq
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 5th June 2005, 05:01 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:09 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2
Copyright © 2014 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1