Quantcast m4500 vs m6500

Closed Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: m4500 vs m6500

  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    4
    Rep Power
    0

    Default m4500 vs m6500

    Hello Everyone,

    I am in the process of specing a new laptop for engineering work. I will do a little bit of CAD, but mainly processor intensive mathematical simulations in Java, Matlab, or Scilab. I am considering purchasing either the m4500 or m6500. I don't think I will mind lugging around the m6500. The positive attributes, as I see them, of the two machines are shown below. Other than that they seem like they are on par, though I can't help but think the m6500 will be able to better handle the cooling requirements of their components than the m4500. What does everyone think? Is it even fair to compare the two?

    m6500 pro's:
    Graphics power (I would get ATI graphics)
    1600 mhz memory supported
    4 RAM slots
    USB 3.0
    Larger screen
    Number pad
    Large track pad
    Build quality and aesthetic advantage (from what I gather from looking at m4400 and m6400 notebooks that my co-workers have)

    m4500's pro's:
    More portability
    Enough room in the budget for a docking station and monitor (which may negate the m6500 advantage of larger screen)


    Thank You,

    Doug

  2. #2
    Notebook Nobel Laureate
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    10,364
    Rep Power
    57

    Default Re: m4500 vs m6500

    If you aren't doing anything GPU intensive, that negates the M6500's advantage. Also, memory speed have zero performance benefit so don't think of that as an advantage. Both can get rather powerful CPUs, though if you find that you can benefit with more than 4GB of memory, the 4 slots in the M6500 would be a much cheaper upgrade to 8GB. Personally, USB 3.0 isn't a big factor me but it's a nice bonus. The M6500 screen is supposed to be better than the M4500 but I haven't compared them, so it depends if you're going to mainly use the laptop screen or use an IPS/MVA desktop monitor w/ your M4500. Is cost a factor for you? How often will you be traveling?

  3. #3
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    4
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: m4500 vs m6500

    My budget isn't tight, but I can't break it. It's company money. I max the budget out on the m6500 with the i7 extreme, 4 g of 1600 mhz RAM, ATI graphics card, WUXGA with webcam, 128G SSD, Intel 6300 wifi, slot load DVD RW, a slim power adapter, and a second power adapter. With the m4500 I can spec it pretty much the same, but with 8g of 1333 and the fx1800, but still have the cash to get the docking station and extra monitor. I guess another point of information for me to add is that I probably o 75% of my work at work, and then 25% at home in the evening. At home I would not have the docking or external monitor.

    I will do some traveling but not much. Maybe 2 business trips a year. I use my bike to get to and from work though , so the daily lug is really the bigger concern.

    I have read that about the 1600 Mhz memory. In reading the below article though, it sounds like I would get a performance boost as long as I have it with the extreme edition processor.

    http://www.legitreviews.com/article/842/1/


    Thanks,

    Doug

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:50 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0