Quantcast Asus N71JA/X77JA review by OC-Freak

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 11 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 110
  1. #1
    Notebook Deity
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Stavanger, Norway
    Posts
    700
    Rep Power
    15

    No Asus N71JA/X77JA review by OC-Freak

    While all the fuzz is around the Asus G73JH, those looking at less expensive all-round PC might be interested in reading this review.

    I originally did an quick review here: Asus N71JA/X77JA first impressions/mini review. But doing an new writeup here to include more test results. My first was DOA (I suspect that antennas for the wireless card was not properly connected), but the new one appears to work perfectly fine.

    My computer is an X77JA which is actually an N71JA, but with no extras (no bag/mouse).

    Specs:
    17,3" 1600x900 LED backlit LCD. (manufactured by LG)
    Core i5-430M 2,26GHz
    ATI Radeon HD5730 1Gb DDR3 (650MHz core / 800MHz memory)
    500Gb 5400rpm HDD (Seagate momentus ST9500325AS)
    Super multi DVD-drive (LG GT30N)
    4GB DDR3 1066MHz (Actually it's 1333MHz kingston memory)
    Atheros N-wireless
    USB 3.0
    4400mAh 6 cell battery.

    Images:
    I do not have an good camera, so refer to this link for images - it looks identical to my laptop.

    http://go.notebookreview.com/?id=525...%2F00001602%2F

    CPU-Z:



    First impressions:
    The keyboard is very good, best I've had on an laptop, but it's not very silent to type on, you can hear the key clicking quite well.
    The trackpad is good, but reqires getting used to, I'm used to scroll by dragging along bottom or right edge, but I've found no option to enable that with this elantech pad. Instead it uses two fingers scrolling..... which requires getting used too
    The LG monitor is average, it looks crisp, but viewing angles are average like most TN panels. Better than my old Acer 5930G laptop, but not as good as the monitor on my old Asus M50SA (had an great monitor from AUO optronics).
    The laptop build quality feels good, it's quite light for an 17", keyboard doesn't flex, and pushing at the back of the monitor doesn't give image distortions.

    Speakers:
    The laptop has altec lansing speakers + subwoofer, and the sound is great, you might have to use the sound control panel to adjust it to your liking, but after doing so the sound is great, with noticeable bass, and acceptable volume. But don't expect to get blown away, it's an laptop afer all

    Noise:
    The computer is very silent during normal use, but uses "spin up fan for short time when needed" rather than "always spin fan at very low speed" which I prefer.
    During load the fan is noticeable as an blowing sound, but not very loud, and not with annoying whining or whirring sounds.
    Overall quite pleased.

    Performance:
    First up the standard windows rating, which honestly don't say


    3dmark06 1280 x 768:


    Vantage performance test (connected an external monitor to be able to run default test):


    Crysis demo @ high quality and 1280 x 720 resolution (1600 x 900 not selectable)



    Battery life:

    Settings: Balanced profile, 70% brightness, profile modified to not dim monitor or turn off monitor, as well as keeping the computer on until there is 1% battery left.

    Using battery eaters reading test to simulate light usage.

    System Info
    Manufacture
    Model
    ModelEx
    OS
    CPU Info
    CPU Manufacture Intel Corporation
    CPU Model Celeron
    CPU Frequency ~2260Mhz
    CPU Extensions | MMX | SSE2 | HT | Enchanted SpeedStep
    CPU Cache Info
    Level 1 Instructions 0
    Level 1 Data 32
    Level 2 Data 0
    System RAM info
    Total Memory: 3949Mb
    Memory slots 0 ( )
    Display Device Info
    Adapter ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5730
    Resolution 1600x900
    OpenGL render device ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5730
    OpenGL driver version 3.1.9210
    Vertex shader version 3.0
    Pixel shader version 3.0
    Hard Disk Drive Info
    S.M.A.R.T. Supported and Enabled
    HDD Model ST9500325AS
    HDD Serial
    HDD FirmWare 0002SDM1
    Main Battery Info
    Device Name K72J-44
    Manufacture ASUSTek
    Serial #
    Unique ID ASUSTekK72J-44
    Chemistry Lithium Ion
    Temperature Termal Control Not Present
    Designed Capacity 48400mWh
    Full Charged Capacity 47839mWh
    Designed Voltage 10,8V
    Current Voltage 10,7V
    Manufacture Date 0/0/0
    Cycles Count 0
    Cells count 3
    Force charge support Not Supported
    Force discharge support Not Supported
    Benchmark results
    CPU BEmarks 0
    GPU BEmarks 0
    RAM BEmarks 0
    HDD BEmarks 0
    Work Done
    Pi calculations 565 Cycles
    HDD read\write 0 Mb
    Fames Rendered 0 Frames
    Benchmark Options
    Resolution 800x600x32
    FullScreen Disabled
    Mode Reader's Test
    Results
    Total time 2:22:46
    Discharge rate (minimum) 32417 mWh
    Discharge rate (maximum) 4294949817 mWh
    Discharge rate (average) 2410443233 mWh


    Temperatures:
    This is the real stress test, running prime 95 and Furmark max burning at same time. Since GPU and CPU share the same cooling solution running separate tests is almost pointless.

    Also notice that reaching these temps under normal use is very unlikely. Throttling treshold for the core i5-430 seems to be 105 degrees celsius.




    CPU peaking out at 94 C and GPU peaking out at 81 C. Even with these temps the computer only feels slightly varm to the touch, my old acer 5930G gets uncomfortably hot to type on during similar stress testing.

    Also there was no throttling during the testing.

    Summary:
    Positive:
    Build quality and design.
    Weight.
    Performance/price ratio.
    USB 3.0
    Silent during use.
    Great keyboard
    Great speakers
    1600 x 900 resolution fits the screen quite well. Full HD would be nice but more straining on eyes (at least for me).
    Doesn't get hot to the touch even during heavy load.
    Very silent DVD-Drive.

    Negative:
    Average bettery, had preferred an larger battery for an 17" PC.
    Doesn't support switching to the core i5-430 intel GMA gfx to save battery.
    2nd Harddrive bay can't be used to add an 2nd harddrive since it lacks connectors/cables.

    Overall I'm very happy with the computer.
    Last edited by OC-Freak; 6th February 2010 at 04:30 PM.

  2. #2
    Notebook Deity
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Stavanger, Norway
    Posts
    700
    Rep Power
    15

    Talking Re: Asus N71JA/X77JA review by OC-Freak

    The ATI HD5730 is based on the desktop "Redwood" HD5670 hardware. It's clocked at 650MHz and equipped with 1GB of DDR3 memory clocked at 800MHz, just like ATI specs. While I do not expect a lot of overclocking headroom, it's always fun to try. Using the latest AMD GPU tool to overclock the card.

    Using 3dmark06 1280 x 768 and default vantage performance test.

    700MHz core and 850MHz memory:




    No issues found and it responded quite nice to the overclock and numbers increased more than I had expected. Let's go for more!

    750MHz core and 900MHz memory:




    Another noticeable bump in score, ready for more?

    800MHz core and 950MHz memory:




    Another bump in scores, more than 1000 points extra in 3dmark06 compared to stock speed. Do this card have any limits? Let's see!

    850Mhz core and 1000MHz memory:




    That is quite impressive! 200MHz extra for both core and memory! But no it's not stable, it's perfectly fine for benchmarking and probably most gaming but it's not stress testing stable, when using furmark it will crash sooner or later (Dispaly driver stopped responding and has been restarted error message).

    I found the sweet spot to be 800MHz core and 1000MHz memory, that is + 150MHz for the core and +200MHz for the memory. Very impressive and a lot more than I expected.

    Crysis demo at 800/1000MHz:



    Temps at 800/1000MHz (furmark extreme burning + prime95 max temp at same time):




    The GPU peaks out at 85 C now and the added heat to the cooling solution makes the Core i5 peak out at 97 C.

    The overclocking potential of the GPU surprised me, was expecting to get +50MHz on core/memory or so, not more. For everyday use I won't use the overclocking potential, but for gaming I might occasionally use it.
    Last edited by OC-Freak; 6th February 2010 at 05:00 PM.

  3. #3
    Notebook Virtuoso
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    McMurdo Base, Antarctica
    Posts
    2,226
    Rep Power
    32

    Default Re: Asus N71JA/X77JA review by OC-Freak

    The 5730 is 10-15% faster than the 5650 based on your scores. These new Radeons are pretty good.
    VAIO S15 w/ modded 640m LE @ 1000/1000, Samsung 840 Pro

  4. #4
    Notebook Deity
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,094
    Rep Power
    13

    Default Re: Asus N71JA/X77JA review by OC-Freak

    2nd Harddrive bay can't be used to add an 2nd harddrive since it lacks connectors/cables.
    This is strange, so it has a space for a second HDD but you can't put one in?

  5. #5
    Notebook Deity
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Stavanger, Norway
    Posts
    700
    Rep Power
    15

    Red face Re: Asus N71JA/X77JA review by OC-Freak

    Quote Originally Posted by Risco View Post
    This is strange, so it has a space for a second HDD but you can't put one in?
    It's sold with either one or two harddrives (different models coming pre-configured from asus), but the one with only one harddrive like mine doesn't have connectors for the harddrive in the 2nd slot. Asus saving cost I guess.

  6. #6
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    575
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Re: Asus N71JA/X77JA review by OC-Freak

    OC-Freak how are you getting the temps off the GPU?

  7. #7
    Notebook Deity
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Stavanger, Norway
    Posts
    700
    Rep Power
    15

    Default Re: Asus N71JA/X77JA review by OC-Freak

    Latest version of furmark supports reading the temp, or you might use AMD GPU tool. Click the thermal sensors tab, click the upper sensor (ASIC Temperature via internal TSS 0) check enable reading, and then click start to monitor the temps.

    Like I did on the attached image.

    I have found no other programs that supports temp readings from these cards yet.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails gputemp.png  

  8. #8
    Notebook Deity
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Stavanger, Norway
    Posts
    700
    Rep Power
    15

    Lightbulb Re: Asus N71JA/X77JA review by OC-Freak

    Image of the 2nd harddrive bay with no connectors, and image of the very funky looking subwoofer.

    Also tip about sound; I found it better to disable "SRS Premium sound", it fits my listening taste a lot better at least. None of the presets were as good as having it disabled.



  9. #9
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    575
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Re: Asus N71JA/X77JA review by OC-Freak

    Thanks that worked.

  10. #10
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    153
    Rep Power
    9

    Default Re: Asus N71JA/X77JA review by OC-Freak

    Quote Originally Posted by OC-Freak View Post
    Latest version of furmark supports reading the temp, or you might use AMD GPU tool. Click the thermal sensors tab, click the upper sensor (ASIC Temperature via internal TSS 0) check enable reading, and then click start to monitor the temps.

    Like I did on the attached image.

    I have found no other programs that supports temp readings from these cards yet.
    I was using Everest Ultimate for temps yesterday and it seemed to be reading the GPU sensor...had a listing for it and gave a reading.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails everest crysis temps.jpg  

 

 
Page 1 of 11 12345 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:51 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0