Asus G75Vw - GTX 670M - 3610QM - In Depth 20 pages review

[Daevart]

I would like to let you know that our website has published a very extensive - in depth review of the Asus G75Vw gaming notebook. The review is in Italian, but it is very readable using the built in translator from google chrome.

removed by moderator - linking to your own site is prohibited by the forum rules

Regards

[Mobius 1]

I would reccomend using babelfish.

On topic: I wish there's a 680M version. I would like more GPU power in the G75, good design etc. But not enough power

EDIT: WOOT DID I READ THUNDERBOLT PORT? Or just bing error?

[Yiddo]

For me that review is not in English?!

8.7gb/s pixel fillrate from the 670M? that is 3gb/s lower than a 5870M at stock 2 years on.

Re-labeled video cards at their best it is all about the CPU here people move on.

[evgasr2]

The gpu-z goes wrong sometimes , because g75 reaches 19k in 3dmark 06 while g73 reaches 12k , and fps in games are way higher than g73, gtx 670m is not a joke its a awsome card , but for some reason asus doent like to use normal mxm .

[Mobius 1]

The gpu-z goes wrong sometimes , because g75 reaches 19k in 3dmark 06 while g73 reaches 12k , and fps in games are way higher than g73, gtx 670m is not a joke its a awsome card , but for some reason asus doent like to use normal mxm .

Asus designers r hipsters, that's why


On topic, if this has a 680M version, how much would it sell for?

[Yiddo]

The gpu-z goes wrong sometimes , because g75 reaches 19k in 3dmark 06 while g73 reaches 12k , and fps in games are way higher than g73, gtx 670m is not a joke its a awsome card , but for some reason asus doent like to use normal mxm .

The 670M is just a 570M I would not call it an awesome card when there are cards being released that double its performance, the 7970M is 50-100% more powerful than the 580M which leaves the 670M back in the stone age.

The core clock has only been raised by 23mhz which makes it no different to a slightly overclocked 570M. The reason the 3DMark results are so high are because of the CPU the G73 came with a 720QM which only got 3000pts the Ivy get 6000+.

People would be much better of going for the 660M just to have newer tech.

On topic, if this has a 680M version, how much would it sell for?

It will/would never have a 680M because with Asus prices it would cost more than an M18x with crossfire or SLI.

[evgasr2]

your correct @yiddo

[Mobius 1]

The 670M is just a 570M I would not call it an awesome card when there are cards being released that double its performance, the 7970M is 50-100% more powerful than the 580M which leaves the 670M back in the stone age.

The core clock has only been raised by 23mhz which makes it no different to a slightly overclocked 570M. The reason the 3DMark results are so high are because of the CPU the G73 came with a 720QM which only got 3000pts the Ivy get 6000+.

People would be much better of going for the 660M just to have newer tech.



It will/would never have a 680M because with Asus prices it would cost more than an M18x with crossfire or SLI.

Aww man

This looks better than the M17x R3/4

Too bad