Closed Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 153
Thread: m17 CPU comparison with 3DMark06
-
19th January 2009, 02:58 PM #1
m17 CPU comparison with 3DMark06
This is a comparison between the different CPUs
offered by Alienware for the m17.
Here are the 3DMark06 Scors I collected from this and other forums to compare.
3870x2
Default CPU/GPU settings:
OverClocked CPU/GPU settings:P8400 @ 2,26 GHz :
1280x720 11,091 (julian-nold)
P8600 @ 2,40 GHz :
1280x1024: 11,567 (Pmanuk) + 100$ / 90€
T9400: @ 2,53 GHz :
1280x1024 11.955 (julian-nold)
1280x720 12.417 (julian-nold) + 250$ / 227€
T9600: @ 2,80 GHz : 13,132 (NBR Forum^^) + 500$ / 455€
X9100 @ 3,06 GHz :
1280x1024 13,971 (E-wrecked) + 850$ / 772€
Q9000: @ 2.0GHz:
1280x720 11,421 (Lyfincyte) + 300$ / 258€
Q9100 @ 2,26 GHz : 12,147 (bamg.ipower Forum) + 850$ / 772€
QX9300 @ 2,53 GHz : 13,999 (tanamerra) + 1,200$ / 1,099€
4850x2oc Q9000
@2.45GHz
1280x720 12,592 (EviLCorsaiR)
oc X9100:
@3,33GHz
1280x1024 14,795 (E-wrecked)
@3,458 GHz
1280x1024 15,123 (E-wrecked)
@3,53 GHz
1280x1024 15,849 (E-wrecked)
1280x720 16,353 (E-wrecked)
oc QX9200 & E-Wrecked 8.12 Drivers:
@2.40ghz
1280X720: 13491 (Ovrclck350)
@2.52ghz
1280X720: 14011 (Ovrclck350)
@2.80ghz
1280X720: 14969 (Ovrclck350)
@2.93ghz
1280x1024: 15185 (Ovrclck350)
1280X720: 15346 (Ovrclck350)
@3.06ghz
1280X720: 15704 (Ovrclck350)
oc QX9200 & 9.6 Drivers:
@2.93ghz
1280X720: 15702 (Ovrclck350)
@3,06ghz
1280x720: 16.036 (Ovrclck350)
oc QX9300
@3,2 GHz (gpu default)
1280x1024 16,178 (la.ultima)
CPU + GPU oced
1280x1024 16,626 (E-wrecked)
1280x720 17,078 (Axman)
Default CPU/GPU settings:
OverClocked CPU/GPU settings:
Most of the scores are made @ 1280x1024, 1280x800 or 1280x720. The systems are all fitted with two 3870 CrossFireX but some have Raid 0/1 some not!
Sadly I have not for every score a confermation links and this is where I need youre help to make this comparison even better!
I'll update this list to ceep it up to date
If you want i can also add Vantage scores but for this I need some
(or scores from other comparisons)
Right now I listed the highest score I found but when I'll have more and you want it, I'll add an average score or the lowest and highest score (wich I would prefer)
If I named youre score and you don't want that ... just say that and I'll remove it if you want to be named say it, too
I hope this can help you to decide wich CPU you should buy or update to!
Greetings
JulianLast edited by julian-nold; 31st July 2009 at 04:05 PM.
Team NBR-NarcissisticBenchRunners M17 General Information & ATI DRIVER & CPU COMPARISON
Alienware m17 (late 2008) 3DMark06 12.538 (1280x720) & 12.188 (1280x1024)
3870 CrossFireX | T9400 2,53 GHz | 4GB DDR3 1067MHz | 2x160GB Raid0 | Windows 7 64bit
Apple MacBook Pro (early 2011) 4.750 (1280x800)
Intel HD 3000 | Core i5 2,3 GHz | 4GB DDR3 1333 MHz | 320GB 5200 rpm| Mac OS X (Mounten)Lion / Windows 8

-
19th January 2009, 04:25 PM #2
Re: m17 CPU comparison with 3DMark06
For the Extreme processors, it depends on what the multipliers are set to. A stock M17 with an X9100 would not be scoring 15k; it's more like 13.9k
M17x-R2 in Customized Able Blue:
Intel Core i7 920xm (ES) | 8GB (2x4GB) Corsair Vengeance 1866mhz CL10 DDR3 Ram | 7970M CrossfireX | Crucial M4 512GB SSD | BigFoot Killer Wireless-N 1103 | Sony BD-5850H 6x Blu-Ray Burner | 1920x1200 RGB LED
-
19th January 2009, 04:34 PM #3Notebook Enthusiast
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Posts
- 19
- Rep Power
- 23
Re: m17 CPU comparison with 3DMark06
BTW is your score what you got when you ran the 3dMark or was it a # AW gave you with your system?
-
19th January 2009, 04:45 PM #4
Re: m17 CPU comparison with 3DMark06
that qx9300 is my score on 7. i get around the same on vista 64 as well.
-
19th January 2009, 04:53 PM #5
Re: m17 CPU comparison with 3DMark06
Ok I'll correct the W7 propaganda

The best score I got! AW scored exactly 11100
E-wreked has in his signature:
3dMark06 x9100 RECORD @ Default -RECORD 15,849 Orb-Verified
Team NBR-NarcissisticBenchRunners M17 General Information & ATI DRIVER & CPU COMPARISON
Alienware m17 (late 2008) 3DMark06 12.538 (1280x720) & 12.188 (1280x1024)
3870 CrossFireX | T9400 2,53 GHz | 4GB DDR3 1067MHz | 2x160GB Raid0 | Windows 7 64bit
Apple MacBook Pro (early 2011) 4.750 (1280x800)
Intel HD 3000 | Core i5 2,3 GHz | 4GB DDR3 1333 MHz | 320GB 5200 rpm| Mac OS X (Mounten)Lion / Windows 8

-
19th January 2009, 05:17 PM #6
Re: m17 CPU comparison with 3DMark06
axmans doesn't fall in this group. it has to be set to default @ 1280x1024
killernotebooks - qx9300 - 16,520
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9445093
alienware user - qx9300 - 16,150
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9464801
list of verified default setting scores..(over clocked and non over clocked)
3870's in 3dmark06Last edited by johnksss; 19th January 2009 at 05:35 PM.
M18X R2 | I7 3940XM | GTX 680M SLI | 2 Vertex 4 256 GB Raid 0 | Vertex 4 512 GB | Msata 240 GB | DVD | 16 GB 2133 Mhz |
Asus MVG | I7 3770K | Team Xtreem LV-2666 Mhz (16GB) | Maxiops 120GB | GTX Titan
Quit jumping on examples as if they are topics! (a favorite forum mistake)
Anything Benchmarking/Over clocking/Tweaking/Gaming & Performance (located in off topic)

-
19th January 2009, 05:41 PM #7
Re: m17 CPU comparison with 3DMark06
Team NBR-NarcissisticBenchRunners M17 General Information & ATI DRIVER & CPU COMPARISON
Alienware m17 (late 2008) 3DMark06 12.538 (1280x720) & 12.188 (1280x1024)
3870 CrossFireX | T9400 2,53 GHz | 4GB DDR3 1067MHz | 2x160GB Raid0 | Windows 7 64bit
Apple MacBook Pro (early 2011) 4.750 (1280x800)
Intel HD 3000 | Core i5 2,3 GHz | 4GB DDR3 1333 MHz | 320GB 5200 rpm| Mac OS X (Mounten)Lion / Windows 8

-
19th January 2009, 05:46 PM #8
Re: m17 CPU comparison with 3DMark06
your gonna have to sort of ditch that 16,200 score from e-wrecked(it's was a flubbed score to prove a point)...it wasn't done using default settings.... his true score is 15,849
Last edited by johnksss; 19th January 2009 at 05:54 PM.
M18X R2 | I7 3940XM | GTX 680M SLI | 2 Vertex 4 256 GB Raid 0 | Vertex 4 512 GB | Msata 240 GB | DVD | 16 GB 2133 Mhz |
Asus MVG | I7 3770K | Team Xtreem LV-2666 Mhz (16GB) | Maxiops 120GB | GTX Titan
Quit jumping on examples as if they are topics! (a favorite forum mistake)
Anything Benchmarking/Over clocking/Tweaking/Gaming & Performance (located in off topic)

-
19th January 2009, 06:34 PM #9Notebook Consultant
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 248
- Rep Power
- 13
Re: m17 CPU comparison with 3DMark06
My best score was 13,999. CPU not overclocked but did disable some background stuff.
Removed by moderator
-
19th January 2009, 07:46 PM #10
Re: m17 CPU comparison with 3DMark06
i just broke 17k
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9700385
Yeah, its at 1280x720, but i cant help that.



LinkBack URL








I`m upgrading, are you? (GTX 780M...
Today, 06:14 AM in Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)