Quantcast m17 CPU comparison with 3DMark06

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 16 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 153
  1. #1
    DELETED
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,266
    Rep Power
    20

    Default m17 CPU comparison with 3DMark06

    This is a comparison between the different CPUs
    offered by Alienware for the m17.


    Here are the 3DMark06 Scors I collected from this and other forums to compare.


    3870x2

    Default CPU/GPU settings:

    P8400 @ 2,26 GHz :
    1280x720 11,091 (julian-nold)

    P8600 @ 2,40 GHz :
    1280x1024: 11,567 (Pmanuk) + 100$ / 90€

    T9400: @ 2,53 GHz :
    1280x1024 11.955 (julian-nold)
    1280x720 12.417 (julian-nold) + 250$ / 227€

    T9600: @ 2,80 GHz : 13,132 (NBR Forum^^) + 500$ / 455€

    X9100 @ 3,06 GHz :
    1280x1024 13,971 (E-wrecked) + 850$ / 772€

    Q9000: @ 2.0GHz:
    1280x720 11,421 (Lyfincyte) + 300$ / 258€

    Q9100 @ 2,26 GHz : 12,147 (bamg.ipower Forum) + 850$ / 772€

    QX9300 @ 2,53 GHz : 13,999 (tanamerra) + 1,200$ / 1,099€
    OverClocked CPU/GPU settings:
    oc Q9000
    @2.45GHz
    1280x720 12,592 (EviLCorsaiR)

    oc X9100:
    @3,33GHz
    1280x1024 14,795 (E-wrecked)
    @3,458 GHz
    1280x1024 15,123 (E-wrecked)
    @3,53 GHz
    1280x1024 15,849 (E-wrecked)
    1280x720 16,353 (E-wrecked)


    oc QX9200 & E-Wrecked 8.12 Drivers:
    @2.40ghz
    1280X720: 13491 (Ovrclck350)
    @2.52ghz
    1280X720: 14011 (Ovrclck350)
    @2.80ghz
    1280X720: 14969 (Ovrclck350)
    @2.93ghz
    1280x1024: 15185 (Ovrclck350)
    1280X720: 15346 (Ovrclck350)
    @3.06ghz
    1280X720: 15704 (Ovrclck350)

    oc QX9200 & 9.6 Drivers:
    @2.93ghz
    1280X720: 15702 (Ovrclck350)
    @3,06ghz
    1280x720: 16.036 (Ovrclck350)

    oc QX9300
    @3,2 GHz (gpu default)
    1280x1024 16,178 (la.ultima)

    CPU + GPU oced
    1280x1024 16,626 (E-wrecked)
    1280x720 17,078 (Axman)



    4850x2

    Default CPU/GPU settings:

    OverClocked CPU/GPU settings:

    Most of the scores are made @ 1280x1024, 1280x800 or 1280x720. The systems are all fitted with two 3870 CrossFireX but some have Raid 0/1 some not!

    Sadly I have not for every score a confermation links and this is where I need youre help to make this comparison even better!


    I'll update this list to ceep it up to date If you want i can also add Vantage scores but for this I need some (or scores from other comparisons)

    Right now I listed the highest score I found but when I'll have more and you want it, I'll add an average score or the lowest and highest score (wich I would prefer)

    If I named youre score and you don't want that ... just say that and I'll remove it if you want to be named say it, too

    I hope this can help you to decide wich CPU you should buy or update to!

    Greetings
    Julian
    Last edited by julian-nold; 31st July 2009 at 04:05 PM.
    Team NBR-NarcissisticBenchRunners M17 General Information & ATI DRIVER & CPU COMPARISON
    Alienware m17 (late 2008) 3DMark06 12.538 (1280x720) & 12.188 (1280x1024)
    3870 CrossFireX | T9400 2,53 GHz | 4GB DDR3 1067MHz | 2x160GB Raid0 | Windows 7 64bit
    Apple MacBook Pro (early 2011) 4.750 (1280x800)
    Intel HD 3000 | Core i5 2,3 GHz | 4GB DDR3 1333 MHz | 320GB 5200 rpm| Mac OS X (Mounten)Lion / Windows 8


  2. #2
    Notebook Elder
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,677
    Rep Power
    28

    Default Re: m17 CPU comparison with 3DMark06

    For the Extreme processors, it depends on what the multipliers are set to. A stock M17 with an X9100 would not be scoring 15k; it's more like 13.9k
    M17x-R2 in Customized Able Blue:
    Intel Core i7 920xm (ES) | 8GB (2x4GB) Corsair Vengeance 1866mhz CL10 DDR3 Ram | 7970M CrossfireX | Crucial M4 512GB SSD | BigFoot Killer Wireless-N 1103 | Sony BD-5850H 6x Blu-Ray Burner | 1920x1200 RGB LED

  3. #3
    Notebook Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    19
    Rep Power
    26

    Default Re: m17 CPU comparison with 3DMark06

    BTW is your score what you got when you ran the 3dMark or was it a # AW gave you with your system?

  4. #4
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    494
    Rep Power
    16

    Default Re: m17 CPU comparison with 3DMark06

    that qx9300 is my score on 7. i get around the same on vista 64 as well.

  5. #5
    DELETED
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,266
    Rep Power
    20

    Default Re: m17 CPU comparison with 3DMark06

    Quote Originally Posted by Axman View Post
    that qx9300 is my score on 7. i get around the same on vista 64 as well.
    Ok I'll correct the W7 propaganda

    Quote Originally Posted by pumaro View Post
    BTW is your score what you got when you ran the 3dMark or was it a # AW gave you with your system?
    The best score I got! AW scored exactly 11100

    Quote Originally Posted by ichime View Post
    For the Extreme processors, it depends on what the multipliers are set to. A stock M17 with an X9100 would not be scoring 15k; it's more like 13.9k
    E-wreked has in his signature:

    3dMark06 x9100 RECORD @ Default -RECORD 15,849 Orb-Verified
    Team NBR-NarcissisticBenchRunners M17 General Information & ATI DRIVER & CPU COMPARISON
    Alienware m17 (late 2008) 3DMark06 12.538 (1280x720) & 12.188 (1280x1024)
    3870 CrossFireX | T9400 2,53 GHz | 4GB DDR3 1067MHz | 2x160GB Raid0 | Windows 7 64bit
    Apple MacBook Pro (early 2011) 4.750 (1280x800)
    Intel HD 3000 | Core i5 2,3 GHz | 4GB DDR3 1333 MHz | 320GB 5200 rpm| Mac OS X (Mounten)Lion / Windows 8


  6. #6
    Over Clock Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    14,580
    Rep Power
    82

    Default Re: m17 CPU comparison with 3DMark06

    Quote Originally Posted by julian-nold View Post
    Hi

    I collected some 3DMark06 Scors from this and an other forum to compare the different CPUs offered by Alienware for the m17.


    P8400: 11,091 (julian-nold)

    P8600: 11,482 (german Forum) + 100$ / 90€

    T9400: 11,942 (NBR Forum^^) + 250$ / 227€

    T9600: 13,132 (NBR Forum^^) + 500$ / 455€

    X9100: 15,849 (E-wrecked) + 850$ / 772€

    QX9100: still looking for a score^^ + 850$ / 772€

    QX9300: still looking for a score^^ + 1,200$ / 1,099€


    OverClocked:

    oc Extreme X9100
    @ ???
    X9100: 16,200 (E-wercked)


    oc Extreme Quad QX9300
    @ 3,19Ghz
    QX9300: 16,628 (Axman)

    @ 3,33Ghz
    QX9300: 16,150 (Vista)


    Most of the scores are made @ 1280x800 or 1280x720. The systems are all fitted with two 3870 CrossFireX but some have Raid 0/1 some note!

    Sadly I have no confermation links and this is where I need youre help to make this comparison even better!

    Just post youre CPU (if you have 2x3870 you can add infos but you don't have to if not post this pls) and the 3DMark06 score, if possible with link.

    I'll update this list to ceep it up to date If you want i can also add Vantage scores but for this I need some (or scores from other comparisons)

    Right now I listed the highest score I found but when I'll have more and you want it, I'll add an average score or the lowest and highest score (wich I would prefer)

    If I named youre score and you don't want that ... just say that and I'll remove it if you want to be named say it, too

    I hope this can help you to decide wich CPU you should buy or update to!

    Greetings
    Julian

    Edit: I'll chance the prices from € to $^^
    axmans doesn't fall in this group. it has to be set to default @ 1280x1024

    killernotebooks - qx9300 - 16,520
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9445093

    alienware user - qx9300 - 16,150
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9464801

    list of verified default setting scores..(over clocked and non over clocked)
    3870's in 3dmark06
    Last edited by johnksss; 19th January 2009 at 05:35 PM.
    M18X R2 | 3940XM | 780M SLI | 2 Samsung EVO's 256 GB | Vertex 4 512 GB | Msata 240 GB | BRDVD | 16 GB 2133 Mhz |
    RVE | 5960X | 4 GTX 980's | 1 Vertex 4 256 | 16GB Corsair Ballist Sport 2400 Mhz DDR4
    Quit jumping on examples as if they are topics! (a favorite forum mistake)

    Anything Benchmarking/Over clocking/Tweaking/Gaming & Performance (located in off topic)

  7. #7
    DELETED
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,266
    Rep Power
    20

    Default Re: m17 CPU comparison with 3DMark06

    Quote Originally Posted by johnksss View Post
    axmans doesn't fall in this group. it has to be set to default @ 1280x1024

    killernotebooks - qx9300 - 16,520
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9445093

    alienware user - qx9300 - 16,150
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9464801
    Thank you a lot! Edit and inclueded 1280x1024.

    Greetings
    Julian
    Team NBR-NarcissisticBenchRunners M17 General Information & ATI DRIVER & CPU COMPARISON
    Alienware m17 (late 2008) 3DMark06 12.538 (1280x720) & 12.188 (1280x1024)
    3870 CrossFireX | T9400 2,53 GHz | 4GB DDR3 1067MHz | 2x160GB Raid0 | Windows 7 64bit
    Apple MacBook Pro (early 2011) 4.750 (1280x800)
    Intel HD 3000 | Core i5 2,3 GHz | 4GB DDR3 1333 MHz | 320GB 5200 rpm| Mac OS X (Mounten)Lion / Windows 8


  8. #8
    Over Clock Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    14,580
    Rep Power
    82

    Default Re: m17 CPU comparison with 3DMark06

    your gonna have to sort of ditch that 16,200 score from e-wrecked(it's was a flubbed score to prove a point)...it wasn't done using default settings.... his true score is 15,849
    Last edited by johnksss; 19th January 2009 at 05:54 PM.
    M18X R2 | 3940XM | 780M SLI | 2 Samsung EVO's 256 GB | Vertex 4 512 GB | Msata 240 GB | BRDVD | 16 GB 2133 Mhz |
    RVE | 5960X | 4 GTX 980's | 1 Vertex 4 256 | 16GB Corsair Ballist Sport 2400 Mhz DDR4
    Quit jumping on examples as if they are topics! (a favorite forum mistake)

    Anything Benchmarking/Over clocking/Tweaking/Gaming & Performance (located in off topic)

  9. #9
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    248
    Rep Power
    17

    Default Re: m17 CPU comparison with 3DMark06

    My best score was 13,999. CPU not overclocked but did disable some background stuff.
    Removed by moderator

  10. #10
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    494
    Rep Power
    16

    Default Re: m17 CPU comparison with 3DMark06

    i just broke 17k

    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9700385

    Yeah, its at 1280x720, but i cant help that.

 

 
Page 1 of 16 1234511 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:08 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2
Copyright © 2014 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1