Quantcast M18xR2 7970M /HD4000 running on 330W vs 240W vs battery

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    507
    Rep Power
    17

    Default M18xR2 7970M /HD4000 running on 330W vs 240W vs battery

    330W 7970M enabled: 3DMark11 score: 10312 (11160, 9031, 7600)
    240W 7970M enabled: 3DMark11 score: 2466 (2371, 3534, 2144)
    On battery 7970M enabled: 3DMark11 score: 2645 (2380, 8568, 2137)

    330W 7970M disabled: 3DMark11 score: 820 (696, 7334, 825)
    240W 7970M disabled: 3DMark11 score: 825 (701, 7339, 824)
    On battery 7970M disabled: 3DMark11 score: 823 (700, 6838, 826)

    So, it seems that when running the Intel HD 4000, the performance doesn't differ between battery or power supply used.

    When running on 7970M, it is almost better to be on battery rather than use the 240W adapter.
    Asus Eee Slate EP121 | i5-470UM | 64GB SSD | 4GB
    M18xR2 | i7-3820QM | 2x AMD 7970M | 12GB | 240GB Wildfire SSD (Win7) + 500GB Momentus XT + 120GB OCZ Nocti mSata (Win8) | Bluray | Killer 1103
    M17xR4 | i7-3820QM | 7970M | 16GB | 120GB SSD + 500GB Momentus Xt | Bluray | Killer 1103

  2. #2
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    449
    Rep Power
    7

    Default Re: M18xR2 7970M /HD4000 running on 330W vs 240W vs battery

    I don't think your supposed to be running those cards in Crossfire on only a 240W adapter. I just went through a nightmare trying to figure that out because a tech at dell said you could but after consulting people here on the forums they said no. after escalating my question at dell I was told by a senior technician that in no way were you supposed to run SLI or Corssfire with a 240Watt Adapter.
    M18xR1 | i7-2960XM Extreme | Dual 2GB AMD Radeon HD 6990M CrossFireX | 16GB Corsair Vengeance 1600Mhz | 180 GB Intel 520 Series SSD & 500 GB 7200 RPM HDD |1920x1080 60Hz| Win 7 64bit

  3. #3
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    507
    Rep Power
    17

    Default

    When you connect the 240W, it says that it will run with reduced performance. Since 90% of the time I'm not running games and I have extra 240W power brick for the my office, I thought it was good to know that I get decent performance on the CPU as long as I have the 7970M switched off.

    BTW running on battery with my config and 7970M enabled, it looks like it is draining approx 23W/hr with the screen brightness turned to minimum and 28W/hr turned to max brightness. This equates to between 3 and 4 hours of operation on battery.

    When I disabled 7970M, it is draining only 16W/hr on low brightness and 20W/hr which means I should be able to get between 4.5 and just over 5 hours on battery. Nice.
    Asus Eee Slate EP121 | i5-470UM | 64GB SSD | 4GB
    M18xR2 | i7-3820QM | 2x AMD 7970M | 12GB | 240GB Wildfire SSD (Win7) + 500GB Momentus XT + 120GB OCZ Nocti mSata (Win8) | Bluray | Killer 1103
    M17xR4 | i7-3820QM | 7970M | 16GB | 120GB SSD + 500GB Momentus Xt | Bluray | Killer 1103

  4. #4
    Notebook Geek
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    86
    Rep Power
    3

    Default Re: M18xR2 7970M /HD4000 running on 330W vs 240W vs battery

    thanks for that, thats good info. with the Asus G71/74 i could only get 1hr running on powersave profile. looks like the battery on the alienware running powersave is much better
    Original Madonion: Alienware M18X R2 | Intel I7-3720QM | AMD HD7970m 2GB X-Fire | 16GB 1600Mhz DDR3 | 64GB mSATA | 256GB Crucial M4 | 2x WD Black 750Gb 7200rpm raid0 | WD Blue 1TB 5400rpm | Blu-ray BDROM | Killer 1103 Wireless

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:54 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0