Quantcast 650M Preliminary Benchmarks = up to 67% faster than 555M - Page 2

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 78
  1. #11
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    468
    Rep Power
    9

    Default Re: 650M Preliminary Benchmarks = up to 67% faster than 555M

    Thanks a lot for the benchmarks! +rep
    I can't wait to receive mine, I'd like to see if the scores are the same with the 3610QM, 6GB of ram and a normal HDD (my specs)
    _____________________


    _____________________

  2. #12
    Notebook Geek
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    79
    Rep Power
    11

    Default Re: 650M Preliminary Benchmarks = up to 67% faster than 555M

    Quote Originally Posted by UberJason View Post
    You've compared 650M (not overclocked) to 555M (not overclocked) and 650M (overclocked) to 555M (presumably still not overclocked); any idea how it compares vs an overclocked 555M? like 650M OC vs 555M OC or 650M vs 555M OC? Would be useful info since a lot of people like to OC the 555M by a good bit!
    Correct on the non-overclocked 555M, I do not have one to add the results. I can only offer an apples to apples non-oc results from the M14x reviews online and show people what the 650M can really do. Would love for someone to add their 555M overclocked results!

  3. #13
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    468
    Rep Power
    9

    Default Re: 650M Preliminary Benchmarks = up to 67% faster than 555M

    Quote Originally Posted by littlezipp View Post
    Correct on the non-overclocked 555M, I do not have one to add the results. I can only offer an apples to apples non-oc results from the M14x reviews online and show people what the 650M can really do. Would love for someone to add their 555M overclocked results!
    The 650m was running at 60°C max OC or non-OC?
    _____________________


    _____________________

  4. #14
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    288
    Rep Power
    9

    Default Re: 650M Preliminary Benchmarks = up to 67% faster than 555M

    Quote Originally Posted by Thornox View Post
    ofcourse it does it to increase battery life when in battery mode.
    yes but shouldnt the 650 be more efficient? so that even when it downclocks, it wont cripple it like the 555m
    M14x R2 Black | Intel® Core™ i7 3610QM 2.3GHz | 12GB 1600Mhz Memory

    120 GB HyperX SSD + 750GB HDD | 1600x900 HD+ | 2 GB GDDR5 NVIDIA® GeForce® GT 650M

    Killer Wireless-N 1202 | Windows 8 Pro | Orion Messenger Bag | 1 Year Advanced Warranty

  5. #15
    Notebook Geek
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    79
    Rep Power
    11

    Default Re: 650M Preliminary Benchmarks = up to 67% faster than 555M

    Quote Originally Posted by Tsukurimashou View Post
    The 650m was running at 60°C max OC or non-OC?
    Non OC. After 1 hour of Metro 2033 overclocked (100% stable by the way) max temp was 65. My laptop is elevated on a cooling stand with fans directly blowing into the intake so I expect it will be hotter on a lap with air intake slightly obstructed.

    Quote Originally Posted by eats7 View Post
    yes but shouldnt the 650 be more efficient? so that even when it downclocks, it wont cripple it like the 555m
    Not all that familiar with the 555M downclocking issue. What did you have to do to trigger this behaviour and I can give it a try later.

  6. #16
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    104
    Rep Power
    6

    Default Re: 650M Preliminary Benchmarks = up to 67% faster than 555M

    I'll add my oc 555m results in a moment

  7. #17
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    288
    Rep Power
    9

    Default Re: 650M Preliminary Benchmarks = up to 67% faster than 555M

    Quote Originally Posted by littlezipp View Post
    Non OC. After 1 hour of Metro 2033 overclocked (100% stable by the way) max temp was 65. My laptop is elevated on a cooling stand with fans directly blowing into the intake so I expect it will be hotter on a lap with air intake slightly obstructed.



    Not all that familiar with the 555M downclocking issue. What did you have to do to trigger this behaviour and I can give it a try later.
    it just downclocks it on battery and cripples it pretty badly.
    M14x R2 Black | Intel® Core™ i7 3610QM 2.3GHz | 12GB 1600Mhz Memory

    120 GB HyperX SSD + 750GB HDD | 1600x900 HD+ | 2 GB GDDR5 NVIDIA® GeForce® GT 650M

    Killer Wireless-N 1202 | Windows 8 Pro | Orion Messenger Bag | 1 Year Advanced Warranty

  8. #18
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    468
    Rep Power
    9

    Default Re: 650M Preliminary Benchmarks = up to 67% faster than 555M

    Yeah when on battery it runs game like if they run on intergrated graphics :/
    EDIT: To give you an idea look at this thread: http://forum.notebookreview.com/alie...ml#post7691272
    12566 with 3Dmark06 plugged in with the 555m
    4036 with 3Dmark06 on battery with the 555m
    2843 with 3Dmark06 on battery with the integrated graphic card.
    _____________________


    _____________________

  9. #19
    Notebook Evangelist
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    427
    Rep Power
    14

    Default Re: 650M Preliminary Benchmarks = up to 67% faster than 555M

    It's good to see such results! Thanks for the comparison.

    When you have time if you could run Bf3 and Crysis 2, possibly to see what settings you can run the game at max.

    Hopefully with the 650M if I end up getting the R2 in September I can max out Mw3 without overclocking GPU ( I had to run 2x AA @ 720p and an overclock of atleast 735 MHZ to get 60-90 fps with dips to low 50s around smoke).
    Alienware m14x R1
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M DDR3
    REFUNDED 1467.87
    Samsung Series 7 - NP700Z5C-S01CA
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M GDDR5
    REFUNDED $1467.87
    Lenovo ideaPad Y580
    Back-up
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 660M GDDR5
    Price $800 Cash
    Alienware 14
    Processor i7-4700MQ 2.4 GHz, Display1366x768 WLED Anti-glareMemory 8GB DDR3, HDD 240GB 530 Intel SSD + 64 gig mSata Samsung, Graphics adapter NVIDIA GeForce GTX765M - 2048 MB, Stock Battery 4-5hrs.
    Price $1455.98

  10. #20
    Notebook Consultant
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    new mexico
    Posts
    224
    Rep Power
    7

    Default Re: 650M Preliminary Benchmarks = up to 67% faster than 555M

    LIttlezip - NM... found the tessellation and DF settings in your screenshot. Thanks!

    will post 555oc figures here shortly. The anandtech figures are old based on old drivers. We all know that drivers make a huge difference. So I will post stock vs oc (@750/1080) standard gaming clocks.
    Last edited by Lancer91; 6th May 2012 at 09:32 PM.
    New and improved m14xR2 - I7, 650 with 2 geebees, some wifi's, SSDs.
    clienterror "Out of curiosity are you one of those guys that buys a BMW but has the crapiest engine and no options with roll up windows just to say you have a BMW?"

 

 
Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:26 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2
Copyright © 2014 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1